Search

Copyright of lnternational Journal of Geography & Geography Education is the property of Marmara University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Public Administration & Policy is the property of Journal of Public Administration & Policy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Strategic & Social Research is the property of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Social Science Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The right to the city refers to the equal and effective use and participation of all individuals in urban space. However, in terms of gender, the city has a masculine structure. Within this structure, women cannot exist equally in the city due to gender-based inequalities. It is necessary to consider the city sociologically in a gender context. This research aims to evaluate women's right to the city from a gender perspective. Gender and the right to the city are the two basic concepts of the study. Based on the literature review on two concepts, the participation of women in urban spaces are discussed. As a result, it can be said that gender inequality reflecting power relations exists in cities as an economic, social, and cultural space, and although women are more involved in the public sphere, they use their city rights in a limited way due to the sexist nature of the public-private space distinction and security problems in the masculine-dominant city. In this context, urban planning and the practices of local governments on a legal basis are of great importance in terms of establishing not only women's rights but also human rights by ensuring gender equality in cities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Covid 19 has led to deep inquiries in urbanization management mechanisms. In the city management systematic, there has been a process that compels the establishment of a more accessible city instead of large projects, which are the products of the understanding that sees the city as growth and rent-oriented. This approach, which marks a return to the human scale, necessitated many spatial arrangements. The most important of these is the reunion of people who have been locked in their homes with their neighborhoods that are within "eye reach"; "Social transparency of the neighborhood" has been accepted for both fear and viewing purposes. In Turkey and in the world, municipalities have implemented many innovative and pioneering urban health and social support practices in this process. In this study, the historical context on the subject, today's environment and most importantly, local service, neighborhood unit, neighborhood status, Covid-19 period municipality application examples are discussed. The selection of sample municipalities was made by random method, but pioneering examples from metropolitan city municipalities to provincial and district municipalities, from municipalities at every level, were tried to be evaluated within the article page limit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Kadın/Woman 2000 is the property of Kadin/Woman 2000 and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Kente ilişkin sorunlar modernleşme, sanayileşme, ulus-devletleşme ve sermaye birikim süreçlerinin iyimser ve olumlu kabul edilen etkilerinin kabulü üzerinden açıklanmaktadır. Söz konusu kabullerin bir yansıması olarak kentlerde demokratik katılımın artırılması yönündeki değerlendirmelerse insan haklarının kentsel mekânda somutlaştırılması temelinde hükmünü sürdürmesini vesile olmaktadır. Bugün kentsel hizmetlere erişimi ve demokratik katılımın artırılma hedeflerine karşılık gelen kentsel haklar insan haklarının kentteki bir kategorisi biçiminde anılmaktadır. Diğer taraftan, altmışlı yıllardan itibaren özellikle Henri Lefebvre’in kent hakkı tartışmalarıyla başlatılabilecek eleştirel kent araştırmaları, kent mekânının yapılandırılması, demokratik katılım ve kentsel haklar üzerine gelişen tartışmalar hakkında itirazlarda bulunmaktadır. Lefebvre’in kent hakkı kavramı kentsel haklardan oldukça farklı içeriklere sahip olmasına rağmen zaman zaman kavramların içeriği birbirine karıştırılabilmektedir. Bu makale Lefebvre’in müdahaleleri çerçevesinde kapitalist modernliğin kentleşme süreci ve insan haklarının bir kategorisi görünümündeki kentsel haklara odaklanmakta ve kentsel haklar ve kent hakkının arasındaki karşıtlıkları açığa çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Yirmi birinci yüzyılın toplumsal değişmeleri arasında demografik dönüşüm ve kentleşme önemli bir yer tutar. Demografik dönüşümle birlikte yaşlı nüfus oranı tüm dünyada artarken, genel nüfusun kentlerde yoğunlaşmasıyla birlikte kentlerde yaşayan yaşlı nüfusta da artış görülmektedir. Öte yandan 1980 sonrası ortaya çıkan neoliberal politikalar kentlerin fiziki yapılarıyla birlikte, toplumsal ve kültürel boyutlarında da önemli değişikliklere sebep olmaktadır. Bu değişim, eleştirel kentleşme teorileri tarafından tartışılırken, konuya yaşlılar açısından bakan çalışmalar oldukça sınırlı kalmıştır. Kentte yaşlanmaya dair neoliberal politikalar ve yapısal faktörler yeterince değerlendirilmemiş; yaşam kalitesi, yerinde yaşlanma, aktif ve başarılı yaşlanma gibi kavramlar etrafında sıklıkla çalışılmış ve son yıllarda bu kavramların daha geniş bir uygulaması haline gelen Dünya Sağlık Örgütü’nün sunduğu Yaş Dostu Kentler ve Topluluklar (YDKT) düşüncesi oldukça kabul görmüştür. Fakat YDKT’nin teorideki doygunluğuna, neoliberal kentleşme pratikleri sebebiyle uygulamada tam anlamıyla ulaşılamamış, bu nedenle birçok eleştirinin hedefi haline gelmiştir. Eldeki çalışma bu doğrultuda kentlerin neoliberal ekonomi politiğini, bunun yaşlıların kenti deneyimleme noktasındaki etkilerini ve YDKT’nin neden bu eleştirilerin hedefinde olduğunu detaylı olaraktartışmayı amaçlamaktadır. Son olarak ise kentte yaşlanma konusunda hak temelli perspektif ışığında önerilerde bulunmaktadır.

Copyright of Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics is the property of Electronic Turkish Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Mediterranean Journal of Gender & Women's Studies (KTC) / Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi is the property of Mediterranean Journal of Gender & Women's Studies (KTC) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Alternative Politics / Alternatif Politika is the property of Alternatif Politika and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

ÖzKent hakkı kavramını ilk olarak 1968 yılında aynı adlı kitabıyla Henri Lefebvre gündeme getirmiştir. Lefebvre çağımızda yaşanan pek çok sorunun temelini kapitalist üretim ilişkilerine dayandırmakta ve bu kapitalist sistemin değiştirilmesi gerektiğine inanmaktadır. Bu nedenle kent hakkı mücadelesini devrimsel değişime giden yolun aracı olarak kabul etmektedir. Lefebvre söz konusu mücadele ile kullanım değerinin ön plana çıktığı, sermayenin tahakkümünden kurtulmuş ve ürün yerine yapıt olma niteliğini kazanmış kentlere ulaşılabileceğinin altını çizmektedir. Buradan hareketle çalışmada, Lefebvre’in oluşturduğu kent hakkı çerçevesi ve unsurlarına (katılım, ortak tavır, çevreye saygı ve aidiyet/sahip çıkma) bağlı kalarak 2012 yılında yürürlüğe giren 6360 sayılı Yasa’nın içerdiği hükümler ve bu yasaya dayalı olarak ortaya konan uygulamalar analiz edilmektedir. Bireylerin yaşam alanlarını ilgilendiren konularda önemli hükümleri olan bu yasa yurttaşların kent yönetimine katılabilmeleri, kentsel hizmetlerden etkin ve verimli bir şekilde yararlanabilmeleri, oturdukları kentlerde istekleri doğrultusunda karar alınmadığında bu kararlar aleyhine ortak mücadele edebilmeleri ve yaşadıkları kentlere kendilerini ait hissetmeleri ile ilgili konularda son derece olumsuz sonuçlara neden olmaktadır. Çünkü yasayla halkın yönetime katılım kanalları (seçimli meclisi bulunan il özel idareleri ve belde belediyelerinin kapatılması) kapatılmaktadır. Bunun yanında yasanın hem Türkiye’nin taraf olduğu Avrupa Yerel Yönetimler Özerklik Şartı’nın sınır değişikliklerine ilişkin hükmüne hem de kent hakkı pratiği açısından önemli bir belge olan Avrupa Kentsel Şartı’nın kenttaşlar lehine tanımladığı hak ve özgürlüklerin çizmiş olduğu çerçeveyle açıkça çelişiyor olması bu anlamda oldukça kritiktir.

Copyright of Journal of Marmara University Social Sciences Institute / Öneri is the property of Marmara University, Institute of Social Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Regarding the future of the industrial heritage, main approaches exclude the wishes of inhabitants, take into account interests of a specific part of society, attach importance to profits. The concept of right to the city has been researched on TÜRASAŞ Eskişehir in order to remind the inhabitants and their demands neglected in the conservation of industrial heritage. Because industrial heritage is a collectively produced artwork(oeuvre). Literature mostly focusses on the period when industrial heritage lost its function. After functional loss, the questions of "what to do with the remains" and "who will make decisions" become current issue. It's important to discuss the right to the city for industrial heritage that maintains original function but faces pressures, in order to produce answers to these questions. First, the effects of heritage on the formation of urban society were investigated. Secondly, these effects, which can be seen as the tangible and intangible values, are discussed under two main headings in the context of the right to the city from Lefebvre's perspective: self-management and appropriate. Although there is a limited interaction between TÜRASAŞ Eskişehir and inhabitants, it has been determined that they appropriate the heritage. At this point, study offers a unique conceptual framework for the future of heritage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neoliberal urbanization policies began to affect Çanakkale from the beginning of 2010. With this effect, the increasing force on urban growth has led to the development of several coastline projects in Çanakkale. The civil initiatives of the city have started a resistant struggle, against the rising growth, in and out of the city council to prevent the implementation of these projects. Today against the neolibaral urbanization the concept of ‘the Right to the City' which Lefebvre developped in 1968, gained more significance. The right to the city movement which organized against the projects developed with the aim of transforming urban space is the main goal of this study. The urban opposition flourished from civil society emerged with the demand to participate in the decision-making on the spatial development of the city by the municipality. The struggle, then, gradually became a struggle for the right to the city, spreading a broader social dimension and more stability. Within the scope of this research, two projects which were halted by the urban opposition, including the Marina project and the project developed in the area of Tekel land, were discussed. The emergence of these projects, their content and the urban opposition organized against these projects were analyzed with the in-depth interviews, and the media monitoring and the publications of urban opposition are also examined in this context. Where two different forms of urban opposition, namely deliberative and resistant, experienced in the case of Canakkale, the civil society in the city strengthened and the relationship between the municipality and the civil society was redefined. This article claims that right to the city struggle in Çanakkale has emerged from a mutual relationship between the consolidation of local democracy and social transformation.

Copyright of Tasarim+Kuram is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of MEMLEKET: Politics & Administration / Siyaset Yönetim is the property of Local Governments Research, Assistance & Education Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In the last 15 years, many cities in different parts of the world have witnessed various facets of neoliberal urban restructuring, from top-down gentrification projects, to mass housing projects causing a real estate bubble, and the eviction of present dwellers. The response has often been street protests and other activities initiated by the dwellers. The same sort of eviction processes have been seen across the world, followed by the widespread privatization of common lands. The Occupy Movements have reacted to the privatization of common lands in many cities of the world. This paper is an analysis of the theoretical background of such movements and a discussion of the limits and possibilities of the Right to the City (RTC) and Commons literature. The aim of the article is to contribute to the literature of critical urban studies by analyzing different interpretations and providing an overview of how these varied conceptualizations shape activism.

Copyright of Megaron is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Social Science Institute is the property of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Social Science Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of International Social Research is the property of Journal of International Social Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ankara University SBF Journal / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi is the property of Ankara University SBF Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of International Journal of Economic & Social Research is the property of Abant Izzet Baysal University, Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Megaron is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Megaron is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Omer Halisdemir Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Omer Halisdemir University, Faculty of Economics & Admistrative Sciene and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

With the impact of globalization, as decentralization of nation-state model and increasing role of municipalities in political process; respect and protection of human rights issues are not only left within the responsibility of states but also local governments. Thus, several international and national charters were published about the right to the city in recent years which determine the local governments duties and responsibilities about human rights. In this paper, urban transformation will be discussed in line with human rights. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The term "law" in Turkish is the plural form of the term "right" in Arabic. In every period of the history, law has been appeared in the frame of the rules which are made by the owner of the "right". In that sense, people who have the power had the "right" of predicting and regulating the interactions. Since the day human beings exist, the term "law" has been changed and became varied. Under the main title of human rights, numbers of "rights" categories were appeared; such as social rights, political rights, and solidarity rights. That study is examining the urban transformation processes by using the perspective of "right to the city" which is one of the newest subcategories of the solidarity rights. Examining the urban regeneration processes, which is also one of the most popular public debates in our country, is highly significant and necessary. There are numbers of mistakes we can observe in urban regeneration processes; such as absence of well-organized plans and ignorance of the public expectations. Because of these mistakes, urban regeneration processes violate the human rights. As a result, there is an urgent need for thinking about these human right violations, creating solutions and policymaking before these violations destroy the basic characteristics of the cities. Cities cannot be defined as the areas that protect the rights of the powerful ones. Cities have to be the areas that create and support the togetherness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]