Search

Political, economic and cultural relations between the Turkic States, which gained their independence with the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and the Republic of Turkey have accelerated since the 1990s. Literature and language studies were also affected by these developments. Writers, poets and academics have started to translate various works between Turkic dialects. The beginning and increase of translations from Turkey Turkish to other Turkic dialects and from these dialects to Turkey Turkish has necessitated scientific research on this subject. Because various problems and difficulties arose in trasnlation between dialects. For this reason, linguistic studies in this field aim to identify these problems and produce solutions. In this study, it was tried to determine the inter-dialect/intra-linguistic translation problems in Mehmet Emin Yurdakul's poems, which were translated from Turkey Turkish to Uzbek Turkic by Tahir Kahhar, and an analysis was made using the descriptive statistics method. In this intralingual diachronic transfer, the statistical consistency between the source text and the target text constitutes the basis of the study. In order to detect these consistencies, translation strategies were used to determine the reduction, expansion and modulation operations at the word level in the examined translation and their statistics were tried to be obtained.

Copyright of RumeliDE Journal of Language & Literature Research / RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of RumeliDE Uluslararasi Hakemli Dil & Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Social Sciences Studies is the property of Social Sciences Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Social Research & Behavioral Sciences / Sosyal Araştırmalar ve Davranış Bilimleri Dergisi is the property of Journal of Social Research & Behavioral Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of RumeliDE Journal of Language & Literature Research / RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of RumeliDE Uluslararasi Hakemli Dil & Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Conjunctions in Kazakh Turkish as well as in Turkey Turkish; They are words that connect words, phrases and sentences in terms of shape or meaning, establish various meanings between them, do not have an independent meaning on their own, but gain meaning in a sentence and are used as a task element in the language with these aspects together with prepositions. Kazakh Turkish is an important Turkish dialect that has attracted the attention of linguists with its rich conjunction of conjunctions that it has had for a long time. In our study, Kazakh conjunctions will be examined in terms of structure and function and will be tried to be explained in the light of Kazakh grammar books and written texts. In this context, various literary texts (novel, long story "povest", story, etc.) selected from Kazakh literature will be used. In addition, these conjunctions will be classified according to their duties/functions and compared with Turkey Turkish. Thus, together with gerunds, attention will be drawn to the importance of conjunctions that add value to the agile and rich expression style of Turkish and its intense expressive power; In particular, the subject of conjunction of Kazakh Turkish and Turkish language in general will be examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Studies on Turkey Turkish dialects have been studied only as "phonetics, morphology, vocabulary or dictionary studies" until recent years. Contrary to these dialect studies, which have become traditional in recent years, research on dialects has been further deepened and studies on structures in dialects have gained a new dimension. In particular, there has been a noticeable increase in studies on auxiliary verbs. Auxiliary verbs have been studied as a structure in the morphology until today. In today's studies, this situation has mostly left its place to meaning and function. In this study, the auxiliary verb “dök- (to pour)”, which has not been identified as an auxiliary verb in Turkey Turkish dialects until today, was handled and some data and evaluations were included. The verb “dök-” was only considered as an independent verb in previous studies on Turkey Turkish dialects or in grammar books on Turkey Turkish, but the verb was never identified and evaluated as an auxiliary verb. In this paper, contrary to this situation, the first determinations were made about the use of the verb "dök-" as an auxiliary verb. The first reason why the verb "dök-" has not been included as an auxiliary verb in any of the dialect studies can be explained by the fact that not many dialect studies have been done in the geography where it is used, and the second reason is that usage areas are limited to one province based on the current findings. In this study, there is information about the compound verb structures formed by the auxiliary verb "dök-", which is used together with the verbs or nouns, the gerundium that it is used with, the tenses and its positive-negative uses. It is thought that the study will contribute to the study of Turkey Turkish dialects and to the literature in terms of introducing a new auxiliary verb.

Copyright of RumeliDE Journal of Language & Literature Research / RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of RumeliDE Uluslararasi Hakemli Dil & Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Cografya Fakültesi Dergisi DTCF Dergisi is the property of Ankara Universitesi Dil ve Tarih-Cografya Fakultesi (DTCF Dergisi) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of RumeliDE Journal of Language & Literature Research / RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of RumeliDE Uluslararasi Hakemli Dil & Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Motif Academy Journal of Folklore is the property of Motif Yayincilik and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Academic Social Science Studies is the property of Journal of Academic Social Science Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Academic Social Science Studies is the property of Journal of Academic Social Science Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Günümüzde artan araştırmacı ve araştırma sayısına rağmen Türkçe sözdiziminin çözülememiş birtakım sorunları bulunmaktadır. Bu sorunların bir kısmı bilgi, belge ve kaynak yetersizliğinden; bir kısmı ise daha önce ortaya atılmış fakat doğruluğu kabul görmemiş iddiaların tekrar edilegelmesinden kaynaklanmaktadır. Türkçe sözdiziminin hakkında kabul birliği sağlanamamış konularından biri de unvan grubudur. Başta terim adı olmak üzere tanımı, yapısı ve kuruluşu hakkında dilciler arasında bir görüş ayrılığı bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca dilbilgisi kaynaklarında bu kelime grubunu oluşturan iki unsurdan biri olan unvan unsurunun içeriği de pek aydınlatıcı değildir. Unvan grubu ile ilgili söz konusu ihtilafların esas sebebi, daha önce ortaya atılmış fakat doğruluğu kabul görmemiş iddiaların sorgulanmak yerine bazı dilcilerce doğru kabul edilerek günümüze kadar tekrar edilegelmesidir. Bu çalışmada unvan grubu, Türkçe’nin söz dizimi özellikleri ile tarihî gelişim ve değişim süreci esas alınarak bütün yönleriyle incelenmiştir. Öncelikle söz konusu kelime grubu tanımı, terim adı, kuruluşu, yapısı, unsurları ve içerikleri, yazılışı, cümle ve kelime grupları içerisindeki yeri ile cümledeki görevleri bakımından ele alınarak bütün özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Daha sonra bu özellikler Türk edebiyatının seçkin eserlerinden alınan cümlelerle örneklendirilmiştir. Böylece unvan grubunun tüm özelliklerinin belirlenmesine, hakkında eskiden beri tekrar edilegelen doğruluğu tartışmalı bilgilerin düzeltilerek doğru öğrenilmesi ve öğretilmesi ile bu kelime grubuyla ilgili kabul birliği sağlanmasına katkıda bulunulmaya çalışılmıştır.

Copyright of Journal of Dil Araştırmaları is the property of Journal of Dil Arastirmalari and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Turkbilig/Turkoloji Arastirmalari Dergisi is the property of Turkbilig/Turkoloji Arastirmalari Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of National Education / Millî Eğitim Dergisi is the property of Milli Egitim Bakanligi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Turkish Studies - Language & Literature is the property of Electronic Turkish Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of RumeliDE Journal of Language & Literature Research / RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of RumeliDE Uluslararasi Hakemli Dil & Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of International Journal of Language Academy is the property of Rota Kariyer and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The oldest two major branches of Oghuz Turkish are Turkey Turkish and Azerbaijan Turkish. Turkey and Azerbaijan Turkish hold all the linguistic and syntactic features of the Old Oghuz Turkish within themselves. The geographical differences they have had did not lead to serious changes in the language, especially in the field of language, between Oghuzes. There are no significant differences between the dialects of Oghuz Turkish in terms of the structure of sentences, the arrangement of the elements of the sentence and the meaning of the sentence. Turkey and Azerbaijan Turkish divide into two in terms of the structure of the sentence. Simple and Compound sentences. In Turkey and Azerbaijan Turkish, simple sentences are sentences that consist of main elements with a single verb. In the dialects of matter, there are several structural logical types within simple sentences. In Turkey and Azerbaijan Turkish, simple sentence divides into a structural logical type that shapes according to the verb and to structural logical type that shapes according to the subject. In the study, in Turkey and Azerbaijan Turkish, sentences with a neutral subject, which is a simple sentence's structural logical type that shapes according to the verb, are compared and the occurring differences and similarities have been shown between the neutral subject sentences in the dialects of matter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of bilig: Journal of Social Sciences of the Turkish World is the property of bilig: Journal of Social Sciences of the Turkish World and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Phrases formed with the word of üzere discussed among prepositions in grammer studies in both historical Turkish and Turkey Turkish is used in often as adverb in syntax. In this study, it is aimed to emphasize the usage and functional features in terms of collacation preposition of üzere in noun element + preposition in Turkey Turkish. In the examination made for this purpose, it has been seen frequently to use with -mAk gerund suffix in the context of collacation features of preposition of üzere in Turkey Turkish. Preposition of üzere in verb + -mAk structure is used frequently with functions of approach, purpose, reason, condition. Other than these functional features, there are also functional features of structure of -mAk üzere such as sequencing, detailing / explanation, continuity in the action that takes place or is desired to take place. Usegas in structures of --DIğI üzere and -AcAğı üzere of preposition of üzere are less common. In direct proportion to the frequency of use functional diversity in -mAk üzere structure is not seen in sequence of - DIğI üzere and -AcAğı üzere. Preposition of üzere in Turkey Turkish often used with gerunds. The examples on which the preposition of üzere is based directly on the noun type words are not encountered much, but according to the meaning of the noun, in sequence of noun + üzere, it is seen that it is used with the function of reporting continuity / invariance in situation / style / form. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Black Sea / Karadeniz is the property of Black Sea / Karadeniz and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of International Social Research is the property of Journal of International Social Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Verbal is an important concept in Turkish with its usage frequency in that it gives power for expressions; provides a short way to transmit messages; prevents unnecessary repetitions and connects the sentences in fluent ways. The aim of the study is to search the verbal which has been named with different grammatical names and which have been put into categories as gerund, participles, and verbal adverbs via the corpus. The corpus (including approximately 35 million entries) has been built up in line with the principles of corpus linguistics. The verbal will be examined according to syntactic and functional qualities. On this aspect, via a corpus infrastructure, the aim of the study can be summarized as to demonstrate and identify the morphological structures of verbal; the specific uses of this morphological structures; the importance of verbal in teaching Turkish as both native and foreign language; the distributions of them into strata (different text types etc.); their systematic labels and their use in idioms/patterns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The question, one of the basic stages of human thinking, has various usages in Turkish as a grammar category as in all languages in the world. One of these usages is intonation. Question intonation is a suprasegmental phoneme created by the harmonious combination of multiple suprasegmental phonemes, including primarily stress and tone, in a sentence during a verbal communication while stating the question that the sender wants to convey to the receiver in a sentence consisting of multiple words. Intonation, though not very common and measured, is used to form question sentences in contemporary Turkish dialects and accents. However, Azerbaijani Turkish is the only Turkish dialect in which it is prudent to produce question sentences with intonation and is widely used in both spoken and written language. The question intonation is used in a measured and widespread manner as a means of producing question sentences together with the question suffix and question words in Azerbaijan Turkish. This question sentence type, which is seen to be used very little since Old Anatolian Turkish in the history of Azerbaijani Turkish, began to be more widely used starting from Fuzûlî in the 16th century. The questions sentences with intonations, available in Turkish of Fuzuli who is regarded as an important poet of not only in Azerbaijan but also the whole Turkish world with his unique poetic language that he formed, appear in different structures established with the creativity and meticulousness of the poet. In this study, the question sentences with intonations used in Fuzûlî's Turkish Divan were revealed by determining various words and structures that are indicative of such question sentences, the samples revealed were divided into various groups by categorization, and phonetic and morphological elements which enable these structures to turn into question sentences with intonation were explained. Thus, the subject of the question sentence with intonation, which is only general knowledge in the history of language, was examined by taking into consideration the Fuzûlî sample. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Social Sciences Research / Sosyal Bilimler Arastirmalari Dergisi is the property of ODU Journal of Social Sciences Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Karachay-Balkar Turkish is spoken approximately by 350 thousand people who is intensely living in Karachay-Cherkess and Kabardino-Balkaria Autonomous Republics of the Russian Federation at the present time and is used as the official and literary language as well. Following the Russian Federation it is spoken most in Turkey. A Karachay-Balkar diaspora of 30 thousand people, who emigrated from Russia in discrete years, lives in Turkey. Today, the descendants of Karachay-Balkarians who came and settled in Turkey approximately 140 years ago continue speaking their native language Karachay-Balkarian by means of preserving ‘relatively’ grammatical features of the language and under the great influence of Turkey Turkish. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The foundations of Turkey Turkish and Azerbaijani Turkic languages which have separate writing languages at present, are based on Old Oghuz Turkic. Nevertheless, there were some differences in phonological, morphological, syntactic and semantic dimensions between the languages spoken/written in Anatolia and Azerbaijan even at that time. These differences played an important role in exposing a branching and development of Old Oghuz Turkish extending from Turkey Turkish on one side to Azerbaijani Turkic on the other. The dialect properties of Azerbaijani Turkish, which was formerly a sub- dialects of Old Oghuz Turkic, is concretized and spread in time and the Azerbaijani Turkish became a separate writing language.The words which have the same vocalization / writing among the dialects of a language are called lexical pseudo equivalents or false friends. These false friends can also be used as a criterion to determine the date of the formation of an accent. Because the meaning differences of a word with the same vocalization / writing at different Turkish accents, makes it easier to determine which accent the text being searched belongs to. In this study, false friends between the Azerbaijani Turkic in Tezkire-i Sheikh Safi, which Neshati translated into Azerbaijan in the XVI. century from the book “Safvetu's-Safa” written by Ibn Bezzaz in Persian, and the historical periods of Turkey Turkish, was identified and determined.Then the types of detected words and their origins are indicated. Also, examples of the usage of these words at the manuscript are also shown. The facts that the false-equivalents between Azerbaijani Turkish and Turkey Turkish, which is the closest dialect to it, are also found in Tezkire-i Sheikh Safi, a work translated into Turkish at the Azerbaijan area in the XVI. century, and that most of them are used with the meaning in Azerbaijan Turkish are very important for the efforts to determine the history of the dialect formation of the Azerbaijan Turkish.

Bu çalışmada; dilimizdeki (Türkiye Türkçesi ve Kırgız Türkçesindeki durumu dikkate alınarak/karşılaştırılarak) yaygın kullanım şekli ve anlam ağı açısından genel olarak mutsuzluk kavram alanıyla ilişkili bir eylemin adı olan üzülmek fiilini, kendi etrafında oluşturduğu kavram alanıyla birlikte ele aldık. Üzülmek fiili etrafında oluşan kavram alanını incelerken özellikle dilimizdeki deyimlerden istifade ettik. Her iki lehçenin deyimleriyle ilişkili yapılmış çalışmaların taranmasıyla Türkiye Türkçesinde konuyla ilişkili 80 deyim, Kırgız Türkçesinde de 21 deyim tespit ettik ve deyimlerdeki kalıplaşmış ifadeleri birer yargı biçimine dönüştürerek, ifadeleri oluşturan zihnin, üzülmek eylemi ile hangi kavramları ilişkilendirdiğini gün yüzüne çıkarmayı hedefledik. Bu sayede Türkçe konuşan insanların üzülmek kavramını işlerken kültürümüzün hangi kodlarını esas aldıklarını, mutsuzluk hissini ifade ederken daha çok tabiattan mı, çevreden mi yoksa insandan mı etkilendiklerini anlamaya çalıştık. Ayrıca, Türkçede mutsuzluk kavramını ifade eden sözlerin arka planındaki zihinsel sürecin inanç sistemiyle ne kadar ilişkili olduğunu da tespit etmeye çalıştık.

Copyright of Journal of International Social Research is the property of Journal of International Social Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of International Social Research is the property of Journal of International Social Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

All languages are strongly influenced by and shaped through the way their communities think and also the way they live. The hendiadyoin ıda taşda, which stands for "in the forest, outside and in the outback" was first time used by Turks in the Orkhon inscriptions to indicate a settlement place. This aforementioned hendiadyoin is not only a place indicator but also it reflects the life-style of its community. Today even though they are constructed with different words, it is been observed that there are also similar other reduplicated expressions in use, created through the same logic and linguistic thought. This situation continues to be a reflection of Turkish thought and continues to exist as a sign of our ancestors in our language. This study will show how the hendiadyoin seen in the first written documents continues to survive until the present century. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proverbs, which were known as "sav" previously, are defined as wise sayings adopted by community with stereotyped forms which have become doctrines as advices or wisely thought or general judgements basing on our ancestors' long experiences. Proverbs are effective language materials for defending an idea, commenting on an event / a behavior or criticizing. Numbers are important for these culture carriers which were adopted by society. It is very natural for numbers, which are basic vocabularies of our language, to be used in proverbs, which are parts of our oral and written culture. The focus of the present paper is the numbers used in proverbs, and the content of the study is restricted with number of "two". Some numbers such as "three", "four", "five", "seven", "nine","forty" are known as blessed in Turkish folk believes. The consecutive of bir "one" is iki "two", and it refers to plurality. The duality in the universe is symbolized with "two". That one is used for absoluteness is effective for usage of two in proverbs more than the other numbers. How the number two is used as noun, adjective, pronoun or adverb, and with which words it is stereotyped is analyzed with some determinations in the present study. Besides, some examples such as "iki...bir / bir...iki" kalıbında "iki eğriden bir doğru çıkmaz", "iki dinle bir söyle", "bir koltuğa iki karpuz sığmaz", "bir buldu, iki ister; akçe buldu, çıkın ister" in which "two" is used in a contradictory sense with one are also included in the frame of the study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Today's dialects, while preserving certain uses in historical dialects, sometimes change them and develop their own use. The preposition which is used form of köre in Khwarazm Turkish, Kipchak Turkish, Chagatai Turkish and form of göre in the Old Anatolian Turkish, is used the form of köre in New Uighur Turkish, form of göre in the Turkey Turkish. There are some differences in the grammatical structures of this preposition in the two dialects and in the functions that are gained due to this structure. The preposition is used in Turkey Turkish in the form of dative case suffix+göre; dative case suffix+köre and ablative case suffix+köre are the forms used in New Uighur Turkish. In this article, the preposition will be described comparatively in terms of their usage patterns and functions in both dialects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our work focuses on the fact that the status of a genitive whether it can be evaluated as a case based on the criteria that are based on determining the case. For this reason, for the firstly in this study, included the comments that do not consider the state of genitive as a case. And then tried to show how the genitive was being assessed according to this basis. Following the views that do not accept as case, the approaches which are accepted as case have been given and trie d to put forward the basic ideas. However, it is seen that the approaches either do not accept as the case, or the views which accept it as the case, have different methods and points of view in themselves. All these different methods and perspectives, , has focused on the opinions and methods that can be fundamental in determining of in the Turkey Turkish case, then the genitive has been evaluated through on this justification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Turkish Research Institute / Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Arastirmalari Enstitüsü Dergisi is the property of Ataturk University Coordinatorship of Scientific Journals and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The Turkish language which has a long history sometimes is spoken in different geographical regions due to different reasons (political, immigration, etc.) and even divided into different dialects. With the division into different dialects, meaning has not been changed between words. As a result of meaningful changes, narrowing or enlargement in the meaning of some words has been observed. Especially with the disintegration of the Soviet Union, transpositions between the dialects have come to the fore and thus the question of "false friends" has emerged. Scientists were soon dealt with by the question of "false friends", which was experienced during the transcription of dialects. In this study, South-North-Western Turkey with Kazak Turkish dialect of the West (Oguz) group from Turkey in Turkish "false friends" words (nouns and verbs) is discussed under titles.. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Syntactical use of numbers in Turkey Turkish has had a wide range since Old Turkish period. Although some of the syntactic structures formed only with numbers have been defined and entitled some others have not been analysed adequately yet. Syntactic structures such as noun compound, adjective compound, number phrase, reduplication, time group, conjuction group, abbreviation group of which components have been composed of numbers are used in Turkey Turkish. Most of them are combinational and conventional structures pertaining to numbers. The other ones have gained lexical unit character by corresponding to a certain meaning. Mathematical operations and terms like "addition", "multiplication", "subtraction", "average" and "approximate value" has been reflected in syntax of Turkey Turkish in a lot of ways. In this study, structures mostly conventional ones based upon numbers which reveal the use of Turkish with mathematic language have been discussed. Besides, structure of syntactic entries consisted of numbers in Contemporary Turkish Dictionary has been mentioned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Diyalektolog - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi is the property of Diyalektolog and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The idioms, which are one of the most important indicators of the existence of a language which has been used for centuries from the Orkhon Inscriptions to the present day, and which increases the expression power of the language, reflects customs, traditions, customs, cultural characteristics and beliefs of the society. Karaim Turkish is one of the dialects in which the idioms are important. In this studying, the idioms of Karaim Turkish in Radloff's Opit Slovarya Tyurkskih Nareçiy were handled and their Turkish translations were found. Afterwards, differences and similarities were determined between Turkey Turkish and Karaim Turkish of these proverbs in terms of voice, form, word information and syntax; some results have been reached by way of differences and similarities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are different opinions about formation of "geber-" verb that is described unloveble people and animals' death in Turkey Turkish. These opinions focuse on two points. First opinion is that geber- "to die" comes from kebe / kebe ~ gebe "swollen, puffy, pregnant". Second opinion is that geber is kabar- verb's binary format. In this paper, after it will be mentioned opinions of researchers that research this word's etymology, it will be criticized them. It will be pointed it's possible to prove that in Old Turkish keber- ~ keper- is about death case in different texts, it is not encountered kebe. It will be refered to the contradiction that altough derivative (keper-) can be determined recurrently, base (kebe-) was seen only after XIV. century. It will be mentioned that keper- > geber- can be come from kep "style, form" base not from kepe ~ kebe that can be described as a conventional in Old Turkish. It will be underlined there is opening like kep+er- in relatonship with base of kep "style, form" and derivative of kebermek. In the meaning dimension, it will be expressed that "(known outside) get a form" means that swelling of the body. It will be supported that kep is base of geber- because of there are closed vowel e (e) and long wovel in kep in Old Turkish by available evidence It will be utilized for showing meaning semantic changes by context examples as much as possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Electronic Turkish Studies is the property of Electronic Turkish Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Functions of the suffix -ma suffix can be classified under three groups in Turkey Turkish. This suffix produces adjectives that are related with root meanings like dönme dolap, sallama çay, gömme dolap, and adjectives like bodoslama atla, silme doldur etc. Besides these functions, it produces permanent nouns like gözleme, sarma, dolma, dondurma, kuzukapama, sürme, etc. This study investigates the suffix - ma as a derivational form and its functions have been classified. The study also evaluates the frequency with which it is used to coin permanent nouns and adjectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]