Search

Zaghloul el-Naggar is one of the scientists who reads the Qur'anic verses about the universe in the light of the modern science. In this study, the views of Zaghloul Neccâr, who analyzes and criticizes the rigid, flexible and balanced approaches to scientific tafsîr/i'jaz, will be examined. Zaghloul el-Naggar has a balanced approach to scientific tafsîr and he separates scientific i'jâz from scientific tafsîr. Because while theories and scientific facts are used in the scientific tafsîr, only the scientific facts are hand led in the scientific i'jâz. Neccâr, who attempts to interpret the Qur'anic verses related to the universe (kevnî) by using scientific facts, aims to reveal the richness of the meanings of the kevnî verses with these interpretations. Zaghloul el-Naggar explains the verses related to the element of the universe such as the sky, the earth, animal, plant and human being in the context of the scientific i'jâz. His inferences about the scientific tafsîr may be considered as either a thematic tafsîr or a sûfî tafsîr. It is one of the priorities of this work to put forward the original interpretations of the kevnî verses of a scientist who has made significant achievements in the field of geology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Conservative Thought / Muhafazakar Düşünce is the property of Muhafazakar Dusunce Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Sosyologca is the property of Sosyologca and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (FLSF) is the property of Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (FLSF) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (FLSF) is the property of Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (FLSF) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Sociology / Sosyoloji Dergisi is the property of Istanbul Universitesi Edebiyat Fakultesi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty is the property of Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi is the property of University of Cumhuriyet, Faculty of Sciences & Arts and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

As a branch of philosophical sciences, a new field of research under the name of sociology of scientific knowledge has been put forward in Europe for the last 40-50 years in order to study the nature, purpose, topic and method of science with its place in private and social life of man. In this field, translations from the western languages into Turkish have been made in Turkey for a few decades. In this article, Mevzûíâtüíl-íUlûm (subject matters of the sciences) written by Tasköprîzâde Isâmeddîn Ahmed bin Mustafa (1495-1561) who was a professor (müderris), an encyclopedist and one of the most remarkable representatives of the sixteenth-century Ottoman world of science, is going to be analized with respect to the sociology of scientific knowledge. While handling the analysis, despite it is not among the main discussion topics of this work, in a few places, certain similarities and differences between the Islamic-Ottoman understanding of science represented by Tasköprîzâde Ahmed Efendi and the western approaches to science are to be pointed out. Mevzû'âtü'l-'Ulûm's original name was Miftâhü's-Sa'âde ve Misbâhû's-Siyâde which was written in Arabic and consists of two volumes. It was translated into Turkish by Kemâleddîn Mehmed, son of the writter and published by Ikdam Matbaasi in two volumes with the title of Mevzû'âtü'l-'Ulûm in Istanbul in 1897. It is possible to see the traditional Islamic-Ottoman comprehension of science in the work of Tasköprîzâde Ahmed Efendi who lived during the Ottoman classical period. Within the framework of this understanding, since the preface of the Islamic history, the status of social science has been granted to the intellectual activities of human beings. It is, however, a fact that the scholars in Europe struggled a lot for that goal during the period from the second half of the eighteenth-century to the third quarter of the twenteeth-century. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Sociology / Sosyoloji Dergisi is the property of Istanbul Universitesi Edebiyat Fakultesi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Sociology / Sosyoloji Dergisi is the property of Istanbul Universitesi Edebiyat Fakultesi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Hacettepe University Journal of Education is the property of Hacettepe University Journal of Education and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)