20 results on '"LEGISLATIVE power"'
Search Results
2. TÜRKİYE'DE SİYASİ PARTİLERİN TERÖRE YAKLAŞIMLARI.
- Author
-
EKİCİ, Süleyman, GÜVEN, Mehmet Emin, and ACAR, Alpcan
- Subjects
- *
POLITICAL parties , *POLITICAL systems , *DEMOCRACY , *EXECUTIVE power , *LEGISLATIVE power , *ELECTIONS , *TERRORISM , *COALITION governments - Abstract
Terrorism is one of the most important problems that threaten the security and survival of states. Political parties, which have an important role in the legislative and executive powers, which are indispensable elements of democratic political systems, act as an intermediary in determining the existing problems in the country, offering solutions and transferring them to the state, and producing policies for this. The approaches of political parties to the problem of terrorism in Turkey are examined through election manifestos and party programs. The aim of this study, which seeks an answer to the question of how terrorism is perceived by political parties, is to reveal the approaches to terrorism of political parties that have a group in the Turkish Parliament. As a method, document analysis was carried out within the framework of the general election declarations, bylaws and party programs of these parties. In the result, it is seen that all parties except HDP see terrorism as a problem area and develop solutions for it. They state that the parties in the parliament should address the terrorism problem not only with security measures, but also with its social and economic dimensions, and solution policies should be developed within this scope. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. BULGARİSTAN EMÂRETİ (PRENSLİĞİ) ANAYASASI: 1879 TIRNOVA ANAYASASI.
- Author
-
Ceylan, Ayhan
- Subjects
CONSTITUTIONAL history ,GREAT powers (International relations) ,CIVIL rights ,LEGISLATIVE power ,TURKISH literature ,TURKS - Abstract
Copyright of Istanbul Commerce University Journal of Social Sciences / İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi is the property of Istanbul Commerce University Journal of Social Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. YAPISAL REFORMLARIN BÜTÇE HAKKININ ETKİN KULLANIMINA ETKİSİ: MEKSİKA ÖRNEĞİ.
- Author
-
ÖZVAR, Seda
- Subjects
PUBLIC finance ,STATE power ,PUBLIC spending ,LEGISLATIVE power ,BUDGET reform - Abstract
Copyright of Journal of Turkish Court of Accounts / Sayistay Dergisi is the property of Turkish Court of Accounts and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. CUMHURBAŞKANLIĞI HÜKÜMET SİSTEMİ KAPSAMINDA BÜTÇE SÜRECİNİN ANALİZİ.
- Author
-
YEGEN, Baki
- Subjects
- *
PUBLIC spending , *REPRESENTATIVE government , *BUDGET process , *CABINET system , *LEGISLATIVE power - Abstract
The presentation of public goods and services through the state in a country is possible only public budget which is a document and a kind of law and process, also makes it possible to collect public revenues and to make public expenditures by collected public revenues. The public budget consists mainly of four different stages. In the countries where is governed by democracy, the executive is involved in preparation and legislative is involved in approval of budget process. The actors in legislative and executive and the roles of the actors vary according to the adopted government system. In this study, effects about the recent change in the government system in Turkey on budget process were examined. In this regard, parliamentary government system which applied in Turkey before, compared first shortly the administrative context, then compared within the budget process with presidency government system which has applied today. As a result, the separation of the powers between legislative with executive in parliamentary government system is soft, and presidency government system has strict separation of legislative and executive, both government systems have some systemic drawbacks during the budget negotiations. In this context, attention was drawn to the measure has been taken for to increase the budget of the previous year by increasing the revaluation rate by taking account of the fact that temporary budget application cannot pass through the legislative in the face of the systemic blockages that may be caused by the presidency government system implements in Turkey. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. TÜRK ANAYASAL GELİŞME TARİHİNDE EGEMENLİK KAVRAMININ GEÇİRDİĞİ DÖNÜŞÜMÜN ANA HATLARI.
- Author
-
BULUT, Metin
- Subjects
LEGITIMACY of governments ,POLITICAL community ,POLITICAL organizations ,STATE power ,LEGISLATIVE power ,FOOD sovereignty ,GULEN movement - Abstract
Copyright of Journal of Judgments by the Court of Jurisdictional Disputes / Uyusmazlik Mahkemesi Dergisi is the property of Court of Jurisdictional Disputes of the Republic of Turkey and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. TÜRK PARLAMENTO HUKUKUNDA YASAMA TEFSİRİ
- Author
-
İBA, Şeref
- Subjects
Social ,Legislative interpretation ,Indirect interpretation ,Direct interpretation ,Legislative power ,Legislative activity ,Sosyal - Abstract
In our legal history, tradition of legislative interpretation, starting from the period of 1876 Constitution with the Heyet-i Ayan, ended with the Constitution of 1961. Accordingly, the application of legislative interpretation has been formed as not limited to the making sense of laws in the narrow sense. In this tradition, legislative interpretation has been understood in a broad sense as the interpretation of all legislative acts covering Constitution, laws and equivalent provisions of laws and rules of procedure of the Parliament,and has been consulted frequently as an easily functioning legislative system. The narrow framework defined in constitutions as the authority of "interpretation of laws" has been exceeded and legislative activity has been carried out through interpretation on all legislative acts in force. Thus, it is necessary to consider the concept of interpretation in a broad framework related to the legislative acts that have been already made and are in force. In Turkish parliamentary law, legislative interpretation that has become one of the main tools of the legislative power in terms of its supremacy over the executive and the judiciary, was abolished with the 1961 Constitution in line with the developments and practices in comparative parliamentary and constitutional law.
- Published
- 2022
8. Başkanlık sistemi
- Author
-
author unknown and author unknown
- Subjects
- Yürütme yücü, Executive power, Legislative power, Yasama gücü, Seperation of power, Kuvvetler ayriligi
- Published
- 2005
9. Kanuni idare ilkesi bağlamında Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararnamesi
- Author
-
Yilmaz, Betül Merve, Gençay, Fatma Didem Sevgili, Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü/Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı., Sevgili Gençay, Fatma Didem, and Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı
- Subjects
Executive power ,Kanunilik ,İdare ,Yasama yetkisi ,Hukuk ,Legality ,Kanun ,Administration ,Presidential Decree ,Yürütme yetkisi ,Legislative power ,Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararnamesi ,Law - Abstract
`Kanuni İdare İlkesi Bağlamında Cumhurbaşkanlığı Kararnamesi` başlıklı tez çalışmasında, Anayasa'ya yeni bir hukuki işlem türü olarak dahil edilen Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararnamesinin anayasal kapsamı, hukuki niteliği ve normlar hiyerarşisindeki yeri öğretideki farklı görüşler çerçevesinde açıklanmıştır. 6771 sayılı Anayasa Değişikliği Kanunu, hükümet sistemi değişikliğinin ötesinde Anayasa'nın yürütme bölümünde radikal bir değişim ve dönüşüm gerçekleştirmiştir. Bu değişimin önemli sonuçlarından biri de kanunilik güvencesi kapsamında bulunan idari birimlerin teşkilatlanma yetkisinin Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararnamesinin düzenleme alanına bırakılmış olmasıdır. Bu nedenle, Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararnamesi, kanuni idare ilkesinin unsurlarından olan `kanun` ve `idarenin kurulması` kavramları kapsamında incelenmiştir. Son olarak, yasama ve yürütme fonksiyonlarına ilişkin temel prensiplerin kanuni idare ilkesi ile kesiştiği zemin üzerinde Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararnamesine yönelik tespit ve değerlendirmelerde bulunulmuştur. This dissertation entitled `Presidential Decree in the context of the Principle of Legality in Administrative Law` discusses the constitutional scope and legal nature of a Presidential Decree, as included in the Constitution as a new form of legal enactment, as well as its place in the hierarchy of norms, by taking into consideration different perspectives on the doctrine. Law No. 6771 on the Amendment of the Constitution has not only brought about a change in the system of government, but has also led to a radical shift and transformation of the executive power of the Constitution. As one of the major consequences of this change, certain administrative bodies under legality assurance can now only become organized subject to the regulative power of Presidential Decrees. To this end, Presidential Decrees have been analyzed with reference to the concepts of `law` and the `establishment of administration`, which are among the elements under the principle of legality in administrative law. The study concludes with a number of observations and remarks regarding Presidential Decrees, against the backdrop of the fundamental principles relative to the legislative and executive functions where they intersect with the principle of legality in administrative law. 197
- Published
- 2020
10. ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ'NİN MALİ GÜÇ İLKESİNE YAKLAŞIMINA İKTİSADİ BAKIŞ.
- Author
-
CANYAŞ, Oytun and SEÇİLMİŞ, İ. Erdem
- Subjects
TAXATION ,CONSTITUTIONAL courts ,ECONOMICS ,JUDICIAL review ,LEGISLATIVE power - Abstract
Copyright of Journal of Economics & Administrative Sciences / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Afyon Kocatepe University, Faculty of Business Administration and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2013
11. DREPTUL DE RETRACTARE A UNEI OPERE.
- Author
-
Popovici, Paul
- Subjects
COPYRIGHT ,NEIGHBORING rights (Copyright) ,LEGISLATIVE bills ,LEGISLATION ,LEGISLATIVE power ,JUSTICE administration ,JUDICIAL process - Abstract
The withdrawal right was clearly stipulated for the first time in the Romanian legislation by Law no. 8 / 1996 on Copyright and Neighboring Rights. Still, its existence had also been established by the previous law (see Decree no. 321 / 1956). Unlike the French legislation, the Romanian withdrawal right is poorly settled; although it is an absolute right, the author has the obligation to indemnify any owners of the exploitation rights who might be prejudiced by the exercise of the said withdrawal right. There are also some issues that need to be highlighted in connection to the law stipulations and the Romanian context. For example, due to its discretionary character, this right cannot be exercised in an abusive manner (since it would create a contradiction in terms), while the withdrawal act, performed as a consequence of the pressures exercised by a dictatorial political regime, is null, and the object of the withdrawal could be an intellectual work let unknown to the public. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
12. KIBRIS'TA KURULMASI DÜŞÜNÜLEN FEDERAL SİSTEMDE TOPLUM (CEMAAT) MECLİSLERİ VE ÖZELLİKLERİ.
- Author
-
Tamçelık, Soyalp
- Subjects
- *
FEDERAL government , *LEGISLATIVE power , *NATIONAL security , *STATE governments , *CONSTITUTIONAL law , *LEGISLATION , *DECISION making , *POWER (Social sciences) - Abstract
The main properties of the legislative organ to be formed in "federate states" of Cyprus have been evaluated in this study. Starting from this evaluation, determining the duties and powers of the "Community Assemblies" is also considered in the study. In Cyprus, these Community Assemblies, appointed separately by both communities, are empowered with legislative and decision making powers. Accordingly, Community Assemblies enjoying a kind of "autonomy" from the central government shall enjoy these powers on religious, educational, cultural, sportive and charity issues within the limits described by the Constitution. The study consists of two main sections; in the first section the "properties of these Community Assemblies" to be created within the federative system are examined, in the second and the last section the duties and powers of these Assemblies are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
13. YASAMA YÜRÜTME YARGI: PLATON'DAN MONTESQUIEU'YA DEVLETİN FONKSİYONLARINA GENEL BİR BAKIŞ.
- Author
-
Büyük, Celal
- Subjects
POLITICAL philosophy ,SEPARATION of powers ,FEDERAL government ,LEGISLATION ,EXECUTIVE power ,LEGISLATIVE power ,JUDICIAL power ,LEGISLATIVE bodies as courts ,STATE governments - Abstract
Copyright of Dinbilimleri Journal is the property of Dinbilimleri Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2010
14. Demokratik anayasada vergilendirme yetkisi
- Author
-
Bayraklı, Hasan Hüseyin, Hatipoğlu, Mehmet, Bayraklı, Hasan Hüseyin, and Hatipoğlu, Mehmet
- Subjects
Yasama Organı ,Demokratik Anayasa ,Executive ,Legislative Power ,Vergilendirme Yetkisi ,Democratic Constitution ,Yürütme Organı ,Tax Power - Abstract
Halkın halk tarafından ve halk için yönetim tarzı olan demokrasi, özellikleri ile kendisini anayasalarda gösterir. Ülkemizde de uzunca bir süredir sivil, demokratik ve çoğulcu bir anayasaya ihtiyaç olduğu tüm kesimler tarafından dile getirilmiş ve yeni bir anayasa yapmak için girişimler olmuştur. Ancak meclisteki dengeler açısından yeni bir anayasa ortaya koymak yerine mevcut anayasada değişiklik yapılması yoluna gidilmiştir. 6771 sayılı Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasasında Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun1 ile Vergi Ödevi’nin düzenlendiği 73’üncü madde ile bu maddenin uygulanmasına etki edecek bazı konularda da değişiklik yapılmıştır. Bu değişiklikle birlikte olması gerekenler bu çalışmanın asıl konusunu oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada öncelikle eski anayasalarda bir idari işlem aracılığıyla kullanılan vergi koyma, değiştirme ve kaldırma yetkisini ifade eden vergilendirme yetkisi incelenecek ve 1982 Anayasasında bu yetkinin nasıl kullanıldığı konusu üzerinde durulacaktır. Dolayısıyla vergilendirme yetkisinin ne olduğu, hangi kurumlar arasında kullanıldığı ve hangi tür sorunlarla karşılaşıldığı dile getirilecektir. Bu uygulamalardan hareketle anayasada vergilendirme konusunda nelere dikkat edilmesi gerektiği hususu nedenleriyle birlikte tartışılacaktır. Bu amaca yönelik olarak da nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden betimsel araştırma yöntemi kullanılacaktır. İlk olarak ifade etmek gerekir ki; demokratik yönetimlerde halk için vergilendirme yetkisini kullanan parlamento, bu yetkisini kanunla kullanmalıdır. Bununla beraber yeni anayasa değişikliklerini de dikkate alarak, sınırlı hallerde vergide değişiklik yapma yetkisi yürütme organına bırakılsa da olağanüstü yönetim dönemlerinde bu yetki Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararnameleri ile kullanılabilecektir. Olağan yönetim dönemlerinde maddi vergi yükünü artırmamak, yeni vergi ve ek ceza getirmemek şartıyla Cumhurbaşkanlığı kararları ile değişiklik yapılabilmelidir. Yürütme daha çok vergilendirme işlemlerinde yer almalıdır. Dış ticaret işlemlerinin vergilendirilmesinde ise yürütme organına biraz daha fazla yetki verilebilmelidir. Mahalli idarelerin vergilendirme yetkisi sadece vergilendirme işlemlerine yönelik olmalıdır. Democracy, as a means of governance of people by and for people, reveals itself with its particulars in Constitutions. In our state, the necessity of a civil, democratic and pluralist Constitution has been verbalised for a long time by all communities and there have been various initiatives for the formation of a new Constitution. However, due to the internal equilibrium of the Parliament, amendments to the present Constitution have been preferred instead of establishment of a new Constitution. By Law Concerning Amendments of the Constitution of the Republic of Turkey numbered 6771, certain revisions were made as well in terms of Article 73 regarding the duty of tax and its execution. The analysis of the setting after the revision sets off the main topic of this study. In the first place, tax-raising power, which was used by administrative actions in the previous Constitutions, will be examined and the exercising of this power in the Constitution dated 1982 will bediscussed. Thereby, tax-raising power, its means, its exercise between institutions and problems encountered during its exercise will be expressed. In accordance with this implementation, the prominent matters in terms of taxation in the Constitution will be dealt along with its causes. Descriptive research method will be used with regard to this aim. Firstly, It has to be expressed that the Parliament, which uses the tax-raising power for people in democratic administrations, shall use this power based on law. Nonetheless, taking account the recent amendments in the Constitution, although the power of making adjustments in relation to taxation may be exercised by the executive organ in a number of limited situations, in periods of state of state of emergency, this power may be exercised by Presidential decree. In periods of ordinary governance, it shall be possible to make alterations by Council of Ministers decision or Presidential decree, provided that the alteration does not promote to the increase of tax burden, implementation of new taxes and additional fines. The executive power shall take place more in the taxations activity. In taxation of foreign commercial transactions the executive organ shall be given more authority. The tax-raising power of the local administrations shall be solely oriented to the assessment of tax.
- Published
- 2019
15. Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta devlet başkanının yasama organı üzerindeki yetkileri
- Author
-
Yakacak, Gülnihal Ahter, Şahin, Kemal, and Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı
- Subjects
Hukuk ,Kamu Yönetimi ,President ,Public Administration ,Authority ,Managerial competencies ,Comparative Law ,Legislative power ,Law ,Public Law ,Legislative bodies ,Government system - Abstract
Bu çalışmamızın amacı, devlet başkanlığı kavramının hükümet sistemlerine göre nasıldüzenlendiğinin ve yasama organı üzerinde ne gibi etkilerinin olduğunun tartışılmasıdır.Çalışmada öncelikle başlıca hükümet sistemleri ve bu çerçevede devlet başkanlığı kurumunadeğinilmiştir. Ayrıca bu hükümet sistemleri ışığında en iyi uygulayan ülkelere örnek verilmişve bu ülklerde devlet başkanının yasama organı üzerinde ne gibi yetkileri olduğutartışılmıştır. Bu tez de özellikle 2007 yılında yapılan 5678 sayılı Anayasa değişikliğininTürkiye'nin hükümet sistemine olan etkisi ve bunun üzerine yapılan tartışmalar irdelenmiştir.Çalışmada 1982 Anayasası ile birlikte cumhurbaşkanına verilen yetkilerin parlamenterhükümet sisteminin gereklerine uymadığı, cumhurbaşkanlığı makamının sembolikolmasından çok icrai yetkilerle donatıldığının altı çizilmiştir. Ayrıca 2007 yılındacumhurbaşkanının halk tarafından seçilmesi 5678 sayılı Anayasa değişikliği ile kabul edilmiş,bu değişiklik halk oylamasına sunulmuştur. Cumhurbaşkanı ilk defa 2014 yılının Ağustosayında halk tarafından seçilmiştir. Halk tarafından seçilen, çok fazla icrai yetkilere sahip bircumhurbaşkanı modelinin parlamenter hükümet sistemi modeline uymadığı açıktır. Buçalışmada, yapılan değişiklikler ve mevcut anayasa hükümleri çerçevesinde Türkiye'de sondönemde tartışılan hükümet sistemi modellerine yer verilmiştir.Anahtar kelimeler: başkanlık sistemi, yarı başkanlık sistemi, parlamenter hükümet sistemi,devlet başkanlığı, devlet başkanlığı seçimleri. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the concept of presidency in Turkey within the scopeof the government systems and the Turkish Constitution of 1982. In the study, major types of governmentalsystems and within this context, the presidency institution have been reviewed in general. In the last chapter, theelection process and the functions and powers of the president in Turkey and the consistency of these functionsand powers with the ones foreseen in classical parliamentary systems have been discussed in the light of therecent constitutional developments in Turkey. In this dissertation, the impact of Turkey's 2007 constitutionalamendment on the Turkish governmental system and the discussions on this issue have been analyzed.In this study, it is underlined that the Turkish president's powers endowed by the Turkish Constitutionof 1982 are not consistent with the powers of presidents foreseen in the classical parliamentary systems since theTurkish president has been provided with excessive executive powers rather than the symbolic ones. The crucialconstitutional amendment which was accepted through a nationwide referendum on 21 October 2007 introducedthe principle of popular election of the president. It is obvious that a president who will be elected by popularvote and has excessive executive powers is not consistent with the classical parliamentary system. In this study,the discussions on governmental systems in Turkey have been examined within the scope of the presentconstitutional provisions and transformation presumption of the Turkish governmental system fromparliamentary to presidential or semi presidential system has been questioned.Keywords: presidential system, parliamentary, parliamentary, semi-presidential system, presidency, presidentialelections. 138
- Published
- 2015
16. The concept of law, in the light of the jurispendence of the Turkish Constitutional Court
- Author
-
Tögel, Akif, Çoban, Ali Rıza, KKÜ, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı, and Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
- Subjects
Hukuk ,Constitution ,Constitutional Court ,Legislative process ,Court decisions ,Laws ,Legislative power ,Law - Abstract
YÖK Tez ID: 308659 Devletin hukuki fonksiyonları içerisinde temel bir yere sahip olan yasama fonksiyonu, yasama organı tarafından genel, sürekli, objektif ve kişisel olmayan işlemler yapılması, diğer bir ifade ile kural koyma anlamına gelmektedir. Yasama organı bu kural koyma faaliyetini kanunlar aracılığı ile yapmaktadır. Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararları ışığında kanun kavramının yorumlanışını irdelediğimiz bu çalışmamız ile kanunla düzenleme alanının sınırlarını çizmek amaçlanmıştır. Ancak bu alanının oldukça soyut olması sebebiyle, öncelikle teorik bir temel kurulmuş, daha sonra ise Anayasa Mahkemesi tarafından tarihsel seyir içerisinde ortaya konan ölçütler ve bu ölçütlerin yer aldığı kararlar arasındaki tutarlılık incelenmiştir. Yüksek Mahkemenin birçok kararı incelendikten sonra, çalışmamızın özünü; bu kararlarda yasama yetkisinin asliliği, genelliği ve devredilmezliği ilkelerinin yorumlanış tarzının oluşturduğu görülmüştür. Mahkemenin bazı kararlarında ayrıntı, ihtisas ve idare tekniğine denk gelen konuların Bakanlar Kurulu tarafından düzenlenebileceği belirtilmekte iken, bazı kararlarında ise temel ilkelerin konulmamış olmasının, çerçevenin çizilmemiş olmasının ve sınırsız-belirsiz-geniş bir alanın yürütmenin düzenlemesine bırakılmış olmasının yasama yetkisinin devri anlamına geldiği ve Mahkeme tarafından Anayasa'ya aykırı görüldüğü sonucuna varılmıştır. The legislative function, which is one of the basic legal functions of the state, implies the continuous, objective and non-personal procedures done by the legislative body. In other words, it means to put rules in to the force. The legislative body exercise this role through the enacment of statutory laws. This thesis aimes to clarify the scope of the concept of law, in the light of the jurispendence of the Turkish Constitutional Court. First the theoritical framework of the subject has been established and then case-law of the Turkish Constitutional Court has been examined. After examining many of the decisions of the Turkish Constitutional Court, we observed that the core of the subject is determined by the interpretation of the principles of primitiveness, generality and non delegation of the legislative power by the Turkish Constitutional Court. In some of the decisions of the Court, it is indicated that the issues relating to detail, expertise and administrative technique can be delegated to the Council of Ministers. But in some other decisions of the Court, founded the violation of the principle of non delegation of legislative power, because the law did not include the basic principles and limitations of the power delegated to the Council of Ministers and since a very wide area has been left to the executive.
- Published
- 2011
17. Montesquieu'da kuvvetler ayrılığı ve özgürlük problemi
- Author
-
Yildiz, Esra, Cihan, Mustafa, and Ortaöğretim Sosyal Alanlar Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı
- Subjects
Freedom ,Divivsion of powers ,Judgment institution ,Philosophy ,Felsefe ,Political philosophy ,Executive organs ,Legislative power ,Montesquieu - Abstract
Kuvvetler ayrılığı ve özgürlük kavramları siyaset felsefesinin temel sorunlarındandır. Özellikle özgürlük problemi, teorik olarak ele alınıp incelenmesi gereken bir sorun olarak karşımıza çıkar. Bu çalışmamızda öncelikle Montesquieu'nun siyaset felsefesinin önemli kısmını oluşturan kuvvetler ayrılığı ve özgürlük sorunu üzerinde durduk ve onun bu sorunlara nasıl yaklaştığını ortaya koymaya çalıştık. Öncelik olarak yönetim biçimlerini ele alan Montesquieu, kuvvetler ayrılığı ve özgürlük kavramlarını siyaset felsefesinin temeline yerleştirir.18. yüzyıl Aydınlanma çağı düşünürlerinden olan Montesquieu, aynı çağdaki bazı düşünürlerin kuvvetler birliği anlayışına çok farklı bir soluk getirerek, günümüzde hala gündemde olan kuvvetler ayrılığı fikrini ortaya koymuştur. Yönetim şekillerini temel olarak Cumhuriyet, Monarşi ve Despotizm diye üçe ayıran Montesquieu, bu yönetimlerde var olan yasama, yürütme ve yargı erklerinin çalışma alanlarının ayrı olması fikrini geliştirmiştir. Nitekim Montesquieu, özgürlük fikrinin ancak kuvvetler ayrılığına dayalı bir yönetim şeklinde var olacağını savunmaktadır.Buna göre, Montesquieu'nun, yönetim şekilleri, kuvvetler ayrılığı ve özgürlük hakkındaki görüşleri birbirinden ayrılmaz niteliktedir. Montesquieu'nun siyaset felsefesinde kuvvetler ayrılığı ve özgürlük problemini ele aldığımız bu çalışmamızda, onun bu sorunları farklı pencerelerden nasıl ele alıp incelediğini göstermeye çalıştık. The separation of powers and the notions of freedom are the main questions in political philosophy. Particularly, the matter of freedom comes up as a problem that should be handled and examined theoretically. In this study of ours, we initially accentuated on the separation of powers and the problem of freedom that forms a great deal of Montesquieu?s political philosophy and tried to display how he approaches these matters. Montesquieu, who takes the forms of government in hand, puts the separation of power and the problem of freedom in the base of political philosophy.Montesquieu, one of the 18th century Enlightenment thinkers, brought up the idea of the separation of powers which is still an issue today, by introducing a different point of view to the idea of the union of powers. He divides the forms of governments into three; Republic, Monarchy and Despotism, and developed the idea that the authorities of legislation, execution and adjudication should be separate. Likewise, Montesquieu argues that the idea of freedom can only survive if it depends on the separation of powers.Therefore, Montesquieu?s views about the forms of government, the separation of powers and freedom are inseparable from each other. In this study, in which we went through Montesquieu?s handling of the separation of powers and the problem of freedom in political philosophy, we tried to demonstrate how he evaluates these points from different perspectives. 93
- Published
- 2009
18. Kazakistan'da yasama ve yürütme erki
- Author
-
Tagayev, Bahtiyar, Akyılmaz, Bahtiyar, Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı, and Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Subjects
Anayasal kuruluşlar ,Executive ,Siyasal Bilimler ,Public Administration ,Kamu Hukuku ,Executive organs ,Yasama gücü ,Political Science ,Yürütme organı ,Legislation ,Yürütme ,Yönetim sistemleri ,Management systems ,Public Law ,Kazakhstan ,Yasama ,Hukuk ,Kamu Yönetimi ,Yasama organları ,Constitution ,Constitutional institutions ,Legislative power ,Law ,Legislative bodies ,Kazakistan - Abstract
Kamu hukukunun bir dalı olan "anayasa hukuku", geleneksel olarak, devletin biçimini ana kuruluşlarının, yasama, yürütme ve yargı yetkilerini kullanan hak ve özgürlükleri incelir. Hemen belirtelim ki. anayasa hukuku, yalnız anayasada yer alan kuralları sistemli bir biçimde inceleyen bir hukuk dalı değildir. Biçimsel anlamda bir anayasa olmasa bile, bir anayasa hukuku vardır. Devletin temel kuruluşunu, işleyişini ve ülkedeki siyasal yapıyı düzenleyen tüm hukuk kuralları, anayasa hukukunun kapsamı içine girer. Kısaca belirtmek gerekirse, anayasa hukuku devlet yaşamının hukuksal çerçevesini belirler; devlet yönetiminin uyması gereken ilkeleri ve bunları uygulayacak mekanizmayı gösterir. Devlet örgütlenmiş bir toplumdur. Her örgütlenmiş toplum gibi, devletin de bir düzeni vardır. Buna anayasal düzen denir. Anayasal düzen, Devlet organlarının görev ve yetkilerini, bireylere tanınan hak ve özgürlükleri belirler. Anayasa, devlet yaşamının hukuksal çerçevesini gösterir. Kazakistan Cumhuriyeti için devlet kelimesi kendi devletim daha geniş olarak bağımsızlığımıza kavuştuktan sonra kullanmaya başladık. Bize küçükken sorduklarında "Almatı Başkentim Moskova Vatanım" diyorlardı. Yoksa kendi devletim kendi vatanım Kazakistan demek ne güzel bir şeydir. Kazakistan Cumhuriyeti 'nin devlet sistemine, yarı başkanlık sistemi, devlet iktidarının tek kaynağı halk olduğunu açıkça belirtmiştir. Kazakistan Cumhuriyeti. insanı, onun hayatı, hakları ve özgürlüğünü en yüksek değer olarak kabul eden demokratik ve sosyal hukuk devleti olduğunu Anayasamızın ilk maddesinde kanıtlar. Kazakistan halkı olarak ortak tarihi kader birliği içinde ezeli Kazak topraklan üzerinde devlet kurarken özgürlük, eşitlik ve hoşgörü ülkelerine bağlı barışsever sivil toplum halinde dünya devletleri içinde onurlu bir yer tutmak üzere şimdiki ve gelecek kuşaklar karşısındaki sorumluluğu idrak etmek suretiyle ve egemenlik hakkımızdan hareketle Anayasamızı kabul ettik., "Constitutional Law", being a branch of Public Law, as a tradition studies a form of basic structure of state, rights and freedom, which are used in legislation, execution and judgement authorities. We have to notice, that Constitutional Law is not only the branch of law that studies rules in a sistematic way in the Constitution. Even if there is no well-formed Constitution, there is Constitutional Law. The Constitutional Law- includes whole law rules that regulate the basic form of state, its procedure and political structure in country. Shortly, the Constitutional Law determines legal frame of the life of state and shows the principles that must be suit in administration of state and mechanism that apply all these. The state is an organized society. Like each organized society, the state also has its own discipline. And it is called a Constitutional discipline. It determines the duties and power of organs of state, rights and freedom of individuals. Constitution shows the legal frame of state life. The phrase "My Country" in the Republic of Kazakstan began to use widely after gaining the independence. In our youth we used to say that "A 1 maty is our capital, Moscow is our motherland". But what a good thing if you say "Kazakstan is my country and my motherland". We, the people of Kazakstan, united by a common historical destiny, creating a state on the native land of the Kazaks, recognizing ourselves as a peace loving civil society devoted to the ideals of freedom, equality, and harmony, wishing to occupy a dignified place in the world community, appreciating our high responsibility before present and future generations, and proceeding from sovereign right, adopt this Constitution.
- Published
- 2004
19. Ulusal düzeyde yasa koyucuların temsil gücü ve özlük hakları
- Author
-
Durgun, Şenol, Tortop, Nuri, and Yönetim Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
- Subjects
Parliament ,Deputy ,Kamu Yönetimi ,Public Administration ,England ,Turkey ,Legislation ,Law maker ,France ,United States of America ,Legislative power ,Legislative bodies - Abstract
429
- Published
- 1997
20. Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlarının yasama, yargı ve üzerindeki etkileri
- Author
-
Ardiçoğlu, Artuk, Günday, Metin, and Diğer
- Subjects
Hukuk ,Judgment ,Constitutional justice ,Constitutional Court ,State administration ,Legislative power ,Law ,Public Law ,Legislative bodies ,Management - Abstract
SUMMARY In contemporary world, judicial review of legislation is considered as a sine qua nor condition of a State of Law. After some sad experiences in 30's, it was understood that giving place to human rights in constitutions -although they are rigid- isn't enough, legislature mighl make them unusable and meaningless by arbitrary actions. It is also necessary to protect them from the violation of legislature and constitutional limitation on legislative authority needs some independent tools. In this aspect, judicial review of constitutionality of laws had been appeared and get a major role in establishing rule of law by keeping legislative within constitutional boundaries. As knowable, the first example of judicial review took place in United States by the decision of Supreme Court in Madison vs. Marbury case at 1803. And United States became a model country in decentralized judicial review system for her followers. Another way of judicial review which was called centralized had appeared in Continental Europe and is accepted generally in our time. In this system effective protection of fundamental rights and liberties ofthe individual could be maintained in the name of reviewing constitutionality of laws by ti Constitutional Courts which were designed and established for that aim. This Continental wii reached Turkey at 60's with the same needs which were mentioned above. Turkish Constitutional Court is a type of centralized and a posteriori review makir systems. The plea of unconstitutionality could be put forward by principal and incident proceeding. The main function of the Court is reviewing the constitutionality of laws and lav amending ordinances on substantive or procedural grounds. If the Court considers that the la1 confirms to the constitution then dismisses the case, otherwise gives invalidation decision aboi the rule. In addition to this expressed type of decisions, in the latest years the Court had als began to give stay order decision that pauses the implementation of the law until the fim decision. The decisions of the Court have erga omnes effects. If the Court decides whether it i necessary, may set a later date for the effective date of decision which could not be more thei one year after publication of the decision in the Official Gazette. In this thesis named `The Impacts of the Constitutional Court Decisions Ovei Legislation, Judiciary and Administration`, in the regard of the plain provisions in th< Constitution of 1982 as;. state governed by the rule of law (Article 2),. supremacy of Constitution (Article 11/1),. laws could not be contrary to Constitution (Article 1 1/2),. the fact of boundriness of the legislative and the executive branches with the decisioi rendered by the Constitutional Court. (Article 153/6) and have no power whatsoever modify or postpone them (Article 138/3), and the general principles of judicial review, the following conclusions have been accepted. Over Legislation: Parliament should not make a same or similar law which was invalidated by th Constitutional Court. In this case the Court will give invalidation decision about the lai according to the Article 153/6. Parliament is also bounded by the reasons of the invalidatio decision of Court, and must take into account the reasons while making a law in the sam subject. Over Judiciary: In the period of reviewing the constitutionality of law by the Constitutional Court, i that law is applicable to the case, the court has to wait until the final decision of th Constitutional Court. If the court did not choose that way then incidental proceeding ought ti be initiated when one of the parties put forward the plea of unconstitutionality. And after th invalidation decision that law could not be used in cases and in that circumstance the action o annulment must be accepted. Invalidation decision about the law must be considered as ; reason of re-opening of proceeding.Over Administration: Administrative agencies could not make changes on the legal status of individual according to a law which was invalidated by Constitutional Court. And the individual acts coul be executed no more after invalidation decision. If the invalidation decision has been learr before publication in the Official Gazette, administration could not create obligations ove individuals according to a law which was contrary to constitution. In a state of Law, it must b unthinkable to apply an invalidated law. The acts which were made before the invalidation of law are untouchable because o not they have assembled a possessed right but for the principle of confidence to state. After invalidation of law, the regulative acts like regulations and by-laws which wen issued upon that law become ineffective without needing any procedure or act. As the administrative authorities are governed by the constitution, in the case o applying the laws which were contrary to the constitution the liability of administration must b< accepted. This situation is obvious especially for the administrative sanctions. Material an< spiritual damages caused by a unilateral act of administration upon an unconstitutional lav could not be let on the shoulders of an individual. 102
- Published
- 1995
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.