Search

Copyright of Mevzu is the property of Ali Sever and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of University of Health Sciences Journal of Nursing is the property of Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi is the property of Justice Academy of Turkey and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Çalışma ve Toplum is the property of Calisma ve Toplum and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Kastamonu University Journal of Economics & Administrative Sciences Faculty / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Kastamonu University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Public & Private International Law Bulletin is the property of Public & Private International Law Bulletin and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Necmettin Erbakan University School of Law Review is the property of Necmettin Erbakan University School of Law Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Research Journal of Politics, Economics & Management / Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of Research Journal of Politics, Economics & Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: According to the World Health Organization's 2023 estimates, 1.3 billion people worldwide, i.e., 1 in 6 people or 16% of the total world population, are seriously physically or mentally disabled. Changing disability/handicap/disablement (DHD) regulations and statutes may cause different DHD rates for the same injury. The presented study aims to determine whether the DHD rate of cases evaluated under any regulation/statute changes under other regulations or statutes, and if so, to what extent this change occurs. Materials and Methods: In the study, DHD rates calculated according to different regulations and statutes on 100 cases at two different universities were also calculated according to other regulations and statutes divided into four groups as A, B, C and D, and the differences between them were calculated statistically. Results: In the study, DED reports belonging to 100 people (mean age: 31.4±16.0), 70 men and 30 women, were evaluated. Statistically significant differences were found in 5 out of a total of six comparisons made according to different regulations and statutes. Conclusions: It was predicted that organizing joint scientific meetings in the fields of medicine and law and gathering VET calculations under a single guide, taking into account international standards and characteristics such as the person's profession, age and gender, would prevent both loss of rights and unjust gains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Fenerbahce University Journal of Health Sciences (FBU-JOSH) / Fenerbahçe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi is the property of Fenerbahce University Journal of Health Sciences (FBU-JOSH) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Community & Physician / Toplum ve Hekim is the property of Turk Tabipleri Birligi / Turkish Medical Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of International Journal of Textbooks & Educational Materials / Uluslararası Ders Kitapları ve Eğitim Materyalleri Dergisi (IJOTEM) is the property of Bilgicagi Egitim Danismanlik ve Yayincilik Sanayi Ticaret Limited Sirketi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The peace and prosperity of societies and the better quality and efficiency of their future lives are closely related to the personal characteristics of the individuals who make up the society. The basis for individuals to have a useful, productive and respected character for society is childhood. A peaceful and happy childhood spent in accordance with child development leads to a healthy and productive adulthood. One of the most important factors in raising children and ensuring that they have a childhood suitable for child development is children's rights. According to the current law implemented in our country, every individual who has not reached the age of 18 is considered a child. What children's rights are and how much they are protected by the legal system play an important role in the child's development. There are many regulations in our Constitution and legal articles regarding children's rights, especially the child's right to life. International agreements have the value of law, and with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, to which Turkey is a party, children in our country are protected by religion, language, race, nationality, gender, etc. has many of the rights included in this agreement, without any discrimination. Unfortunately, juvenile delinquency has become one of the serious problems of every society because of the nature of children in need of protection, their ability to understand the meaning and importance of the acts or behaviors they have committed or will commit, and therefore they can be easily deceived. This situation is one of the most important problems in our country. In our study, juvenile delinquency, the reasons that push children to crime and the legal provisions that will be applied to them will be discussed in the context of children's rights. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective:In Türkiye, 5th item of Patient Rights Regulation declares that “Health care services must be provided without distinction of patients’ race, language, religion or religious sect, sex, political opinion, philosophical opinion, economic or social state or any other differences”. The aim of this study is to determine the discrimination faced by LGBT, and violation of their rights based on their gender identity or sexual orientation while receiving health care.Methods:Our study was conducted as a cross-sectional survey study. LGBT individuals were contacted through the Black Pink Triangle Izmir Association; For Researches On & Against Discrimination Based On Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. Questions of our survey were compiled from items of Turkish Patient Rights Regulation and questionnaires which were used in “Surveillance Report of Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Türkiye” study. All data analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 18.0).Results:Sixty-three LGBT individuals were included in this study. Forty-four of the participants (69.8%) were homosexual/lesbian or gay, 11 of them were bisexual (17.5%) and eight of them (12.7%) were transgender. 84.1% (53) of the participants had health insurance. We found that transgenders were exposed to discrimination significantly more than bisexuals and homosexuals (p=0.042). Fourteen individuals claimed that they were exposed to discrimination based on their gender identity or sexual orientation: 11 of them were discriminated by physicians (78.56%).Conclusion:We found that LGBT individuals face discrimination more than the general population and usually receive health care in inconvenient conditions. We believe that starting from health care providers, public awareness should be raised about discrimination rates, and also a health care policy should be developed and an action policy should be planned about the discrimination of LGBT individuals.

Mülteci ve sığınmacıların haklarına ilişkin Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi’nde (AİHS) doğrudan düzenlemeler yer almamış olsa da AİHS, bu hakların korunması açısından en önemli sözleşmelerden biridir. 1951 Mültecilerin Hukuki Statüsüne İlişkin Cenevre Sözleşmesi’nde mültecileri geri göndermeme kuralına birtakım istisnalar getirilmişken, AİHS’de bu istisnaların olmaması, Sözleşme’ye daha geniş bir uygulama alanı sağlamaktadır. Sözleşme’yi uygulayan yargı organı Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi (AİHM) ise, mültecilerin haklarını AİHS hükümleri kapsamında ele almaktadır. Türk hukukunda da Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne (AYM) bireysel başvurunun getirilmesi ve AİHM’nin ihlal kararları göz önüne alınarak düzenlenen Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Kanunu (YUKK) ile uluslararası mevzuat Türk hukukuna dahil edilmiştir. Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin de kararlarında, AİHM kararlarına paralel incelemeler yaptığı ve uluslararası kuruluşlarının raporlarını esas aldığı ve uygulamacılara yol gösterdiği görülmektedir.

İnsan, varlık bilincine sahip olan bir canlıdır. İnsan olmak bakımından nasıl bir değer taşıdığı ve bununla ilişkili olarak hangi hak ve sorumluluklara sahip olduğu soruları insanın kadim zamanlardan beri yanıt aradığı soruların başında gelmektedir. “İnsan hakları (human rights)” ifadesi bu sorgulama süreci ile doğrudan bağlantılı bir şekilde ortaya çıkmış modern kavramlardan biridir. Kavramın gelişimi itibarıyla siyasî ve seküler bir anlam çerçevesi bulunmaktadır. Ancak bugün insan hakları felsefî, ahlâkî, teolojik pek çok boyutu kapsayan geniş bir anlam alanı içerisinde tartışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, insan hakları kavramı Allah-insan ilişkisi bakımından incelenmiştir. Nitekim İslâm dini söz konusu olduğunda, “hak” kavramının hem ilâhî hem de beşerî çağrışımları olan geniş bir anlam içeriğine sahip olduğu görülmektedir. Kur’ân’da insan haklarının teolojik çerçevesi, Allah ile insan arasında gerçekleşen mîsâktan/ahidden hareketle çizilmektedir. Mîsâkın bir gereği olarak Allah, insana bir emanet teslim etmiş, onu halife olarak görevlendirmiş ve insanı bununla onurlandırmıştır. Bu onurlandırmanın mahiyeti, Allah’ın yasalarını yeryüzünde hâkim kılma görevi ve bunun için yeryüzünün insanın hizmetine verilmesidir. Bu şekilde varlık sahnesinde yerini aldıktan sonra, insanın sahip olduğu hakların iki boyutu vardır. Birinci boyutu insanın dünyevî-toplumsal bağlamda, insan olmak bakımından sahip olduğu haklardır. Batılı toplumların kavramsallaştırdığı insan hakları kavramı doğrudan bu boyutla ilişkilidir. İkinci boyutta ise insan hakları, insanın Allah ile ilişkisi/mükellefiyeti söz konusu edildiğinde ortaya çıkan haklar olarak dinî-mânevî bir içerik taşımaktadır. Bu haklar, dünyevî-toplumsal alanda olduğu gibi kaynağını Allah’ın insanı yaratılış bakımından mümtaz kılmasından ve insanla olan ahdinden almaktadır. İnsan hakları tartışmalarının teolojik boyutu olarak da ifade edilebilecek bu haklar kulun mükellefiyetine ilişkin haklardır. Mükellef olduğu hususlarda bilgi sahibi olması, bunlara güç yetirebilmesi (istitâat), özgür iradeyle eylemde bulunabilmesi, tüm bunların karşılığında mükâfat veya ceza alması kulun mükellefiyeti ve dinî-manevî bakımdan insan hakları konusu içine dâhil edilebilecek meseleler olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Kelâm âlimleri çoğunlukla, kulun mükellefiyeti çerçevesinde ortaya çıkan bu tür hakları, Allah’tan bağımsız ve O’na rağmen ortaya çıkan haklar olarak değil bilakis Allah’tan doğan O’nun Hak, mutlak iyi olmasının ve ilim, adalet, hikmet gibi niteliklerinin bir ifadesi olarak görmüşlerdir. Bu çalışmada insan haklarının teolojik dayanakları ele alınarak kavramı seküler bir bakış açısıyla temellendirmenin neden olduğu sınırlılıkları gidermek ve insan haklarının daha bütüncül ve kapsamlı bir metafizik temellendirmesini sunmak amaçlanmıştır.

The book, which is the product of Rudolph Peters's long years of work, selected articles he wrote on the history of Egyptian and Islamic law, especially on the legal order and the actual application of the law. Many reviews have been written about this book, which is the fruit of nearly half-century research. So I will evaluate some points the author overlooked. Rudolph Peters starts by arguing that Islamic law is insufficient within the framework of modern human rights. He states clearly: Islamic law is not universal. There is no equality in Islamic law. Expressing that Islamic law is not universal, the author limits the application area of this law to the Islamic country. According to him, Muslims who leave the Islamic territories are not subject to sharia, and even if they commit a crime there, they will not be penalized when they return. Islamic law identified non-Muslims outside the Islamic country as enemies. So their lives and property are not under legal protection. While there are exceptions to this, the violation of protections does not entail retaliation or blood money. However, there seemed to be a fundamental disagreement over the problem between Rudolph Peters and Islamic law scholars. They divided the countries into two parts and defined the country based on Islamic principles as an Islamic country. According to this definition, other countries are an abode of war. It used to refer to countries outside the Islamic country - in today's terms - foreign countries. Muslims outside the Islamic country are also subject to the rules of Islamic law. Islamic law scholars said there is no distinction between being inside or outside the Islamic country in terms of the punishment for the crime committed. Only the Hanafis have argued that no penalty for crimes committed outside the Islamic country since there is no possibility of penalization. The absence of it outside the Islamic country does not mean crime is permissible. Acts such as murder, theft, adultery, and drinking alcohol committed outside the Islamic country are also prohibited. Rudolph Peters argues that the non-Muslims in an Islamic country have the protection of life and property. However, their legal capacity is limited. What RP expresses here is that non-muslims cannot hold public office. According to him, they cannot be the guardians of Muslims. However, there is a sharp disagreement over their legal capacity between RP and ıslamic law scholars. They point to the desire for an Islamic country in which citizens treat each other as equals. Most of the restrictions existing in social life aim to protect their interests. The most important example of this is the non-Muslims wearing their unique clothes. It is an error to consider this regulation as evidence of restriction of legal capacity. The measure was taken partly as a precaution to determine identity in middle age. There was no means to determine identity -like an identity card. Moreover, most people know that non-Muslim community leaders have made a supreme effort to preserve their traditional clothes.

Copyright of Ankara Barosu Dergileri is the property of Ankara Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi is the property of Justice Academy of Turkey and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of International Journal of Management Cases is the property of Access Press UK and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Dokuz Eylül University Law Review is the property of Dokuz Eyluel University, Faculty of Law Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The book, which is the product of Rudolph Peters's long years of work, selected articles he wrote on the history of Egyptian and Islamic law, especially on the legal order and the actual application of the law. Many reviews have been written about this book, which is the fruit of nearly half-century research. So I will evaluate some points the author overlooked. Rudolph Peters starts by arguing that Islamic law is insufficient within the framework of modern human rights. He states clearly: Islamic law is not universal. There is no equality in Islamic law. Expressing that Islamic law is not universal, the author limits the application area of this law to the Islamic country. According to him, Muslims who leave the Islamic territories are not subject to sharia, and even if they commit a crime there, they will not be penalized when they return. Islamic law identified non-Muslims outside the Islamic country as enemies. So their lives and property are not under legal protection. While there are exceptions to this, the violation of protections does not entail retaliation or blood money. However, there seemed to be a fundamental disagreement over the problem between Rudolph Peters and Islamic law scholars. They divided the countries into two parts and defined the country based on Islamic principles as an Islamic country. According to this definition, other countries are an abode of war. It used to refer to countries outside the Islamic country - in today's terms - foreign countries. Muslims outside the Islamic country are also subject to the rules of Islamic law. Islamic law scholars said there is no distinction between being inside or outside the Islamic country in terms of the punishment for the crime committed. Only the Hanafis have argued that no penalty for crimes committed outside the Islamic country since there is no possibility of penalization. The absence of it outside the Islamic country does not mean crime is permissible. Acts such as murder, theft, adultery, and drinking alcohol committed outside the Islamic country are also prohibited. Rudolph Peters argues that the non-Muslims in an Islamic country have the protection of life and property. However, their legal capacity is limited. What RP expresses here is that non-muslims cannot hold public office. According to him, they cannot be the guardians of Muslims. However, there is a sharp disagreement over their legal capacity between RP and ıslamic law scholars. They point to the desire for an Islamic country in which citizens treat each other as equals. Most of the restrictions existing in social life aim to protect their interests. The most important example of this is the non-Muslims wearing their unique clothes. It is an error to consider this regulation as evidence of restriction of legal capacity. The measure was taken partly as a precaution to determine identity in middle age. There was no means to determine identity -like an identity card. Moreover, most people know that non-Muslim community leaders have made a supreme effort to preserve their traditional clothes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Man is a creature with an awareness of existence. One of the most important questions that human beings have been seeking answers to since ancient times is what kind of value they have in terms of being human and what rights and responsibilities they have in relation to this. The term "human rights" is one of the modern concepts that emerged in direct connection with this process of inquiry. The concept of human rights has a political, secular framework of meaning in terms of its development. However, human rights are being discussed in a wide field of meaning, which includes many philosophical, moral, and theological dimensions. In this study, the concept of human rights is analyzed in terms of Godhuman relationship. The theological framework of human rights in the Qur'ān is drawn on the basis of mīsāq (the covenant) between God and man. As a requirement of the mīsāq, Allah has entrusted man with a trust, appointed him as a caliph and honored him with it. The nature of this honor is the duty to make Godʾs laws prevail on earth, and for this purpose, the earth has been given to manʾs service. After man has taken his place on the stage of existence in this way, manʾs rights have two dimensions. The first is the rights that human beings have in the worldly-social context in terms of being human. The concept of human rights, as conceptualized by Western societies, is directly related to this dimension. In the second dimension, human rights have a religious-spiritual content as the rights that arise when the relationship/obligation of man with God is in question. These rights, which can also be expressed as the theological dimension of human rights debates, are rights related to the divine commandment. From a religious and spiritual point of view, human rights are related to having knowledge about the matters that one is obliged to do, being able to do them (istiṭāat), acting with free will, and being rewarded and punished for all these. In this study, the theological foundations of human rights are discussed. In this respect, it is aimed to overcome the limitations caused by grounding the concept of human rights from a secular perspective and present a more holistic and comprehensive metaphysical grounding of human rights. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the most discussed issues in everyday life in the world and in Turkey is human victimization and animal victims from human origin. The relationship between man and animal is based on very old time. Starting from the ancient Greek, the more moderate human-animal relationship has been transformed into a problematic relationship from the first time. Starting with Aristotle and after many thinkers continued, he conducted studies and reviews on this problematic relationship. Today, studies are still being carried out and solutions are sought. The work done in this context, Taking into account the presentations of the dog news with 4 legs and tail with the high school student Mehmet Özer, who lost his life by being attacked by street animals in Kayseri Hacılar on January 4, 2019, became an increasingly social problem It aims to analyze the human-animal relationship. The news in the media after both events was examined in the study, these news are T. A. It was analyzed by Van Dijk's discourse analysis method. When the presentation of the news in the media, the images used, the titles of the parties on the subject were examined, it was seen that animal-based discourse was more dominant than human- based discourse. It has been observed that animal-based discourse is made on the basis of rights, kept on the agenda through activists, and the issue is discussed vividly on the agenda of both the people and the politicians. On the other hand, it was noticed that the news of the high school teenager did not receive as much attention in the media as the news of the dog, whose 4 legs and tail were cut. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Religious Education Studies / Türkiye Din Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of Turkish Journal of Religious Education Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of ASBU Law Journal is the property of Social Sciences University of Ankara and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Akademik Hassasiyetler is the property of Huzeyfe Suleyman Arslan and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Research Journal of Politics, Economics & Management / Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of Research Journal of Politics, Economics & Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Bulletin of Legal Medicine / Adli Tıp Bülteni is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The governance of the Ottoman Empire was founded upon the principles of Islam and its legal system. The Ottoman war law mirrored the legitimate approach to war in Islam, which was grounded in legal and moral principles, emphasizing the concept of a just war. Consequently, warfare had to possess legitimacy both in its execution and its justifications. Throughout all stages of conflict, specific principles needed to be upheld, ensuring humanitarian, legal, and moral considerations were respected. The Ottoman Empire, deeply rooted in Islamic traditions, engaged in numerous conflicts throughout its existence. While the empire experienced victories and held decisive positions in wars during its early establishment, it faced a series of major defeats in the latter half of the 19th century, as explored in this article. Despite these losses, the Ottoman Empire demonstrated a steadfast commitment to upholding humanitarian, moral, and legal principles in warfare. It consistently implemented regulations to safeguard the rights of civilians and non-combatants, both during and after conflicts. In order to ensure compliance with these principles on the battlefield and beyond, the empire pursued a policy that occasionally issued warnings to its own officials and even imposed punishments for violations. Simultaneously, it endeavored to protect Ottoman citizens who maintained religious and ethnic ties with states against which it fought. Upon examining archival records, it becomes evident that the Ottoman Empire sought to strike a delicate balance between its pursuit of victory in war and the preservation of fundamental human values.

The concept of Islamophobia is commonly known as a condition of phobia vis-a-vis Islam and Muslims, which develops into hostile behavior, including verbal and physical abuse against Muslims, their scripture, holy personalities, and symbols including assault against mosques, cemeteries, and religious centers. The Runnymede Trust, a British think-tank, holds that the “animosity harbored against Islam and Muslims in Western societies is unique and can only be grasped using an equally unique concept, hence the justification of the term Islamophobia” (Conway Runnymede Trust, 1997). In the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist incident, Islamophobia is no longer viewed as a spontaneous reaction towards Muslims by isolated groups. Instead, it is transformed into a systematic anti-Muslim rhetoric of right-wing extremists propagated through well-designed and equally well-orchestrated media campaigns to achieve well-defined political gains. Although Islamophobic sentiments have gained traction, particularly after the events of September 11th, their origins can be traced back to much earlier periods, giving rise to problematic perceptions. Muslims are being subjected to pandemic of hate and negative stereotyping through different media platforms. Life for them, in some of these parts of the world, has become a constant struggle. They are living under fear of retaliatory attacks and being discriminated for maintaining their religious identity. This is happening under brutal occupation regimes in Palestine and Indian-occupied Kashmir and equally in democratic societies under the garb of “Laicite” (Wintour, 2020). Consequently, hate crimes against Muslims or even those who “look Muslims” have soared exponentially, especially, in parts of Europe, North America, and Asia. Muslims, in different parts of the world, whether living under occupation or as minorities and communities, are besieged and are under assault.

The India-Bangladesh boundary is one of the most vulnerable and most problematic borders in the World. The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) tortures, abducts or opens fire on Bangladesh civilians residing around the border at every opportunity. From time to time, BSF officers enter the territory of Bangladesh illegally and break into house in villages in the border region and carry out attacks. These engagments are viewed as a major threat to Bangladesh border security and security and safety of residents in the border area. Although all neighboring countries have some sort of problems with legal or illegal crossings, practices up to the level of massacre have not been recorded. These systematic and predetermined activities of Indian officials are considered violation humane treatment according to the UN 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as other national and international regulations. In this study, security problems that constitute serious violations of human rights on the Bangladesh-India border are discussed. The leading causes of the killing of Bangladeshi citizens living in or crossing the border are by BSF officers are emphasized, and the impact of these border killings on bilateral relations is examined. Considering that the events are also serious violations of human rihgts, the possibility for an international solution is proposed unless the problem is resolved through bilateral negotiations. As the study is concerned with the practices between the two countries that are in violations of clear provisions of international law, the analyses are carried out through case study method with a specific emphasis on content analysis. Thus, despite the use of figures, the inferences are based on qualitative research method. In this regard, that the violations of law are shadowed by political relations in which India has an upper hand in every aspect is the main subject of this study. This article aims at revealing the legal bases of these violations, emphasizing constructive solutions through bilateral negotiations and thereby filling an important gap especially in the Turkish literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Academic Journal of Philosophy / Felsefi Düşün is the property of Pinhan Yayincilik and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Omer Halisdemir Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Omer Halisdemir University, Faculty of Economics & Admistrative Sciene and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study analyzes the development, institutionalization, and globalization of the LGBT movement and also examines how the movement has been constructed in the context of rights discourses and implemented as a civilization project. The main question this study examines is, "How has situating gay rights in the context of human rights discourse reflected onto strengthening Western hegemony over the global South?" In this context, the study first descriptively analyzes the development, institutionalization, and globalization of the LGBT movement in the 20th century, then critically analyzes the globalization of the gay movement and the process of it being supported by international, transnational, and supranational institutions. Lastly, the study will question how the rights discourse of the gay movement has been constructed as a civilization project, as well as its functionality in maintaining Western hegemony. The article will use academic literature, reports, and public research in this respect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The responsibility of transnational corporations in terms of human rights violations occuring in their supply chains has been a significant topic of debate in recent years. It is seen that addressing liability within the framework of soft law regulations does not provide sufficient effect on preventing violations. At this stage, the role of national tort rules and the increasing number of binding due diligence regulations in the human rights liability of transnational corporations is being debated. The most comprehensive example of binding national law norms has been drafted in Germany. The Corporate Duty of Due Diligence in Supply Chains Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltsgesetz-LkSG) entered into force in Germany on January 1, 2023. In this study, first of all, the liaison between transnational corporations and human rights will be briefly discussed. Then, the regulatory framework of LkSG in terms of human rights responsibility of companies will be analyzed. Finally, the civil liability of companies will be analyzed from the perspective of the recent decisions of the English courts, which tend to overcome the principle of separate legal personality in the corporate group, as well as the debates in German law. In lieu of a conclusion, the paper concludes with an assessment of the impact of the regulations and decisions on Turkish law. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Selcuk Law Review / Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Selcuk Law Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In this study, the concept and exceptions of equality between men and women in pre- and post-marriage practices in Islamic Family Law have been tried to be examined in the light of the Qur'an and Sunnah. It is seen that there are unique expressions about the concept of equality in Islamic Family Law. Islamic Family Law focuses on the concept of rights rather than equality. Islamic Family Law saw all people as equal in basic rights, but drew attention to the fact that differences in creation and abilities should not be ignored. In some cases, it can be said that there are situations that disrupt the equality in the delivery of the right to the person. The changing living conditions and the interpretation of the Qur'anic verses and hadiths from different perspectives have led to the emergence of different views on the concept of equality. This situation is based on religion, gender, psychological difference, etc. caused by reasons. Although these elements seem not to comply with the principle of equality at first glance, the fact that Islamic family law is based on the principle of "rights" rather than equality leads to the conclusion that this situation is not considered an inequality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Ombudsman is an impartial and independent institution, which contributes to the dominance of good governance principles and participatory democracy in the operations of the administrations, reduces the burden of the judiciary system, supervises the administrations, and makes recommendations. The Ombudsman, to which individuals apply against the actions and transactions of the administrations that may cause them victimization, guides the actions and transactions of the administrations and eliminates individual victimization by its decisions. There is no study in the literature that analyzes the Ombudsman's decisions using qualitative and quantitative analytic methods within the scope of good management principles. To fill this gap, a total of 724 Ombudsman decisions made between 2016-2022 within the scope of the public personnel regime in Türkiye were examined in terms of good governance principles using content analysis, which is a qualitative analysis method. Findings showed that 47% of Ombudsman applications are for the actions and transactions of the Ministry of Health, Ministry of National Education, and University Rectorates. According to the subject of the application, 67% of the applications were related to the appointment, assignment and staffing requests, and the payment of financial rights. The number of non-compliance with good management principles in 724 decisions examined was 922 and 43.6% belonged to the administrations of the Ministry of Health, University Rectorates and the Ministry of National Education. Pearson X² (chi-square) test, a quantitative analysis method, was run to determine whether the compliance of the administrations with good governance principles is different. It was observed that there are significant differences in the level of compliance of the administrations with some good governance principles, including 'Showing the remedies against the decision, Compliance with the law, Courtesy, Transparency, Compliance with the rightful expectation, Protection of vested rights, and Right to information'. It cannot be stated that the principles of good governance were fully addressed and examined in detail in the Ombudsman's reports. It is recommended that in the ombudsman's decisions, the incompatibilities be identified in the 'Assessment of Compliance with Law, Equity and Human Rights' section in terms of good governance principles in the 'Evaluation of Good Governance Principles' section. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Ankara Barosu Dergileri is the property of Ankara Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Süleyman Demirel Law Review / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Çalışma ve Toplum is the property of Calisma ve Toplum and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Humanitarian intervention, as a form of military intervention purporting to prevent or end widespread and severe human rights violations, is based on the doctrine of universal human rights. The philosophical foundations of the universal human rights doctrine are largely shaped by natural law and natural rights, as well as the deontological ethics based on Immanuel Kant's "categorical imperative." The natural law perspective, which is based on the presumption that human beings have certain natural rights just by virtue of being human, and Kant's ethics of obligation, which is based on the formula of humanity as an end in itself, are the underpinnings of the doctrine of universal human rights in this context. Humanitarian intervention is claimed on the same philosophical grounds, within the framework of the acceptance that humans have a value that needs to be protected and the necessity of helping others who need help in the context of Kant's ethical or imperfect duties. This study reveals that the arguments produced in favor of human rights and, therefore, humanitarian intervention are mainly rooted in natural law and deontology, and the philosophical foundations of humanitarian intervention are tried to be clarified within this liberal context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Iş, Güç: The Journal of Industrial Relations & Human Resources is the property of Is, Guc: The Journal of Industrial Relations & Human Resources and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Public & Private International Law Bulletin is the property of Public & Private International Law Bulletin and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The right to health is a concept that does not have a long history and has newly begun to gain a place for itself in classical human rights theory. Today it is accepted that, the boundaries of the theoretical hierarchy of human rights are blurred and all human rights are interrelated. Parallel to the development of the human rights theory, the importance of right to health is increasing, both in international and national legal provisions. This study focuses on the definition and elements of the right to health. In this regard, the international legal provisions on the right to health and its main elements will be explored. Then, what kind of obligations that states have regarding the right to health will be mentioned. Finally, the legal provisions in the Turkish Law will be explained.

İnsan hakları alanında sosyal hareketlerden ve taban örgütlerinden barolara, iş derneklerine ve gayriresmî iletişim ağlarına kadar uzanan çeşitli aktörler bulunmaktadır. İnsan hakları alanında en etkin aktörlerden biri olan sivil toplum kuruluşları (STK) hem ulusal hem de uluslararası düzeylerde insan haklarının tesisi, korunması ve geliştirilmesi için dünya çapında çeşitli işlevler görmektedir. Bu çalışma, insan hakları temelli STK’lar üzerinden, Türkiye’deki sivil toplum faaliyetlerinin ve mobilizasyon stratejilerinin sistematik bir incelemesini yapmayı amaçlamaktadır. Glasius’un sınıflandırmasından yararlan bu çalışmada, Türkiye’deki STK’ların, insan hakları gözlemcisi ve norm-dönüştürücü olarak seslerini duyurabilseler dahi, kanun yapıcı aktörler olarak bu hakların tesisinde ve korunmasında yetersiz kaldıkları savunulmaktadır. İnsan hakları STK’ları izlemede isim zikretme ve utandırma ve yargısal savunuculuk stratejilerini kullanırken, norm dönüşümünde çerçevelemeyi, kanun yapımında ise savunuculuk stratejileri yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışma, içerik analiz yöntemini kullanarak STK’ların belgelerine odaklanmakta ve Türkiye’deki insan hakları ve sivil toplum ilişkisini inceleyerek akademik tartışmalara katkı sunmaktadır.

Copyright of Community & Physician / Toplum ve Hekim is the property of Turk Tabipleri Birligi / Turkish Medical Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)