Search

Copyright of Sociología del Trabajo is the property of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law is the property of Espaco Juridico: Journal of Law and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Prudentia Iuris is the property of Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Pensamiento y Acción Multidisciplinaria is the property of Universidad Catolica del Maule. Escuela de Trabajo Social and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The process of drafting the Spanish Civil Code begins with the napoleonic invasion and the attempt to impose the French Code. In 1812, the «Cortes de Cádiz» included in the new Constitution the project of achieving a unitary Civil Code for all Spanish. The legislative path to reach the final text of the Code is full of obstacles and progress. It was not until the Restoration of the monarchy that the final text was completed, in 1889. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Anuario del Instituto de Historia Argentina is the property of Universidad Nacional de La Plata and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Derecho y Ciencias Sociales is the property of Universidad Nacional de La Plata and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Nuevo Foro Penal is the property of Universidad EAFIT and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Politico is the property of Editorial UNED and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Bill n.°038-2015, submitted by the Government, brings about some important amendments to the competition regime, some of which have given rise to concerns in academia. This paper analyzes eight contentious topics of the aforementioned Bill, contributing in this manner to the debate that has emerged about the Executive's proposal. Thus and firstly, aspects related to the institutional structure of the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (independence and concentration in the same agency of investigative and judging powers during administrative proceedings) are addressed. Subsequently, one of the most discussed topics of the Bill is reviewed, this is, the concession of jurisdictional powers to the Antitrust National Agency to rule on indemnity claims arisen from individual or class actions. Next, the paper studies the Counselor-Committee's role, emphasizing on the new hearings that the Bill introduces, to analyze, afterwards, the drawbacks that emerge from the new fining-system therein stated. Then, the document briefly comments about the debate that has arisen with respect to the convenience or inconvenience of preserving fines to individuals. Later on, the criminalization of competition law is addressed -making specific reference to the international discussion related to this topic- and the ability to exercise criminal prosecution powers by the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce. Finally, the paper examines the amendments to the merger control system introduced by the Bill, specifically the binding nature that the proposed act intends to grant to the concept rendered by the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce with regards to mergers in the financial and aeronautical sectors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Ibero-Latinoamericana de Seguros is the property of Pontificia Universidad Javeriana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Despite the fact that constitutionalism Colombian general rule is the principle of freedom of legislative initiative of the members of Congress in the formation of laws, the Constitution has established with respect to certain matters that the initiative rests on an exclusive basis to the National Government. In that vein, this paper presents the arguments employed by the Constitutional Court to clarify the scope of application of the grounds that limit legislative initiative in the form reserved for the National Government. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]