Search

Copyright of Verba Iuris is the property of Universidad Libre Bogota, Centre de Investigaciones Socio Juridicas de la Facultad de Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article analyzes the increase in the use of assisted reproduction techniques and their legal regulation in Latin America, focusing on the context of Sinaloa, Mexico. It highlights the need for less restrictive and conservative regulation that protects human rights and legal principles and values. The diversity in assisted reproduction legislation in Latin America is mentioned, as well as the influence of non-legal criteria in its regulation. Additionally, the lack of regulation in some countries is mentioned, which has led to the commodification of human genetics. The document provides a list of references related to infertility treatment, heterologous artificial insemination, surrogacy, semen donor selection, and fundamental rights in legal philosophy. It also includes international declarations and agreements on the human genome, human cloning, intergenerational responsibility, and bioethics. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnologia y Sociedad is the property of Centro de Estudios sobre Ciencia, Desarrollo y Educacion Superior and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Aposta is the property of Aposta and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Verba Iuris is the property of Universidad Libre Bogota, Centre de Investigaciones Socio Juridicas de la Facultad de Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This work analyze the bioethical worries emerging because the possibility of cloning human beings. It is decribed the experiment done in lambs by Wilmut et al. and its scientific and ethical repercussions about human cloning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the evolutionary process of the human species, nature has worked hard on making each human being different from any other. Through sexual reproduction, all genes from the father are put together with those of the mother. These genes combine in infinite ways as to assure that genetically and biologically each one of us is a unique individual. This guarantees the human species success and the uniqueness of every human being. Cloning human beings as a biotechnological possibility, poses serious danger due to the scientific lack of knowledge in such aspects as differentiation and genome reprogramming, as well as it is imperfect because most reconstructed embryos die and is useless due to the genetic imprinting and mutations. It also violates the equality and dignity principles consecrated for any member of the human species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

El artículo explora el campo de la bioética y el debate mundial sobre la clonación. La clonación se ha convertido en unas de las dilemas que han ocurrido como consecuencia del progreso de la ciencia. El artículo presenta una mirada al escenario de este debate, ofreciendo información sobre los beneficios de la clonación humana tanto como detalles sobre las preocupaciones, como la integridad familiar, la seguridad y la autonomía.

El artículo presenta una declaración de la Naciones Unidas sobre la clonación humana. Se menciona que la organización es consciente de los problemas de éticos que se afrentan las ciencias biológicas, la dignidad del género humano y a las libertades fundamentales. La declaración también explica la conciencia del parte de la organización en cuanto a los peligros médicos y psicológicos asociados con la clonación humana.

El artículo explora el debate acerca de la clonación humana. Se menciona que los investigadores consideran la clonación como una manera de copiarse y cambiar su realidad. Tales investigadores afirman que un clon no es una persona, pero están diseñando clones para familias. El artículo expone que no hay manera exacta para comprobar que la clonación guarda la dignidad de la persona.