The Finite Element Method has showed the wide possibilities that it possesses as tool for the solution of engineering problems and research problems. As a result of it their employment has a great diffusion in the community of engineers, so much in study centers as in research centers and factories. If, this is in this way, then: Which is the reason for which the engineers has a dependence so high of the professionals software, even when the costs of acquisition of these is very high and the research centers or the universities don't dedicate time and efforts to the development of these? According to the author's point of view the reality is that the abilities in the use of software can be acquired by most of the professionals in the matter, but the theory on the method it is even not very understood by the most, even when they have learned how to use one of this professional software. Which is the cause? Most has not reached the understanding of the physical problem and much less can to separate the mathematical tool that is used for their instrumentation not confusing it with the physical problem. The rezone of this is in first instance that the texts published don't leave clear both aspects and in second place because in order to do this work is required a multidisciplinary group with almost exclusive dedication for this task. In this article the fundamental physical problem related with the topic will be presented, with a proposition on the necessary order to transmit the physical problem, separating it of the mathematical tool, in such a way that you can be understood each one of them in separate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]