Search

The 1990s saw the emergence in Germany of the so-called "iconic turn" (ikonische Wende). Keith Moxey (2009) interprets this turn as a new paradigm that, fed up with the linguistic turn and the thesis of mediated access to reality, proposes the image as an instance of immediate access to the world, eliminating the distinction between subject and object. However, Boehm argues that the iconic turn must be understood on the basis of the turn of all turns, the Kantian transcendental turn. The hypothesis I will defend here is that the iconic turn is to be understood as a post-Kantian thought. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

“‘The Spectre of Marburg’ wanders around the Operative Aesthetics. Luis Juan Guerrero, ‘Evolutive’ Reader of Heidegger”. This paper aims to analyse the reading of Martin Heidegger’s thought offered by Luis Juan Guerrero in his Operative Aesthetics. I claim that “The Origin of the Work of Art” plays a central role in the work of the Argentinian philosopher. However, this does not mean that Guerrero is not an original author or that he is a mere commentator of the German philosopher. On the contrary: the Argentinian philosopher offers a productive reading of Heidegger which allows him to build his own and authentic philosophy. By focusing on Heidegger’s essay on art and on the first volume of the Operative Aesthetics, this paper analyses three essential issues: the concept of tool, the world-earth relationship, and the bond between history and truth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Endoxa is the property of Editorial UNED and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Logos: Anales del Seminario de Metafísica (1575-6866) is the property of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In this paper I aim to analyze Guerrero's position as a reader of Heidegger, particularly the conceptual continuities and discontinuities between the Argentine philosopher's methodological proposal of an "operative aesthetic" and the German thinker's essay on art. We will focus on the first volume, Estética operatoria en tres direcciones. Revelación y acogimiento de la obra de arte, and the essay "The Origin of the Work of Art". Our hypothesis is that Guerrero is an anthropophagic reader: while he agrees with some of Heidegger's ideas on art, the Argentine philosopher is also critical and, through his reading of "The Origin of the Work of Art", he elaborates an original proposal. Specifically, Guerrero takes, I affirm, the phenomenological-hermeneutical methodology and applies it in an original way to the analysis of works of art. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Laocoonte is the property of Sociedad Espanola de Estetica y Teoria de las Artes and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In this essay I try to demonstrate that the concept of God in "The Origin of the Work of Art" by Martin Heidegger does not refer to a divine-religious figure but must be framed within the Leitmotiv of all his philosophy, the question of being. The hypothesis to be defended will be the following: Heidegger uses the notion of "god" to describe the process of founding a space of meaning. First, I will analyze some counter arguments to this hypothesis (Guerrero, Kockelmans and von Herrmann), according to which Heidegger would be talking about the possibility that art reconnects us with the gods as such. Then, I will move on to the main argument in which I will link the essay on art fundamentally with the seminary on Parmenides (GA 54) to show how the notion of God is linked to the concept of being and meaning (Sinn). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 1935 Martin Heidegger surprisingly delivered a lecture in Freiburg on the origin of the work of art. Why sis Heidegger give such a lecture? Why did s "art" appear as a decisive question that year? We only find brief mentions on this subject in his works prior to the essay on art. How to fit this apparent "oasis" in Heideggerian thought? Following the steps of William Richardson, Martin Heidegger's work is usually divided into two great moments separated by what is known as the turn (Kehre). Where should we approach the work from? Should we understand his ideas from what he has worked on in Contributions to philosophy? Or should we enter "The origin of the work of art" from the works of the first Heidegger? These questions, of a methodological-interpretative nature, are those that we propose to answer throughout the work, seeking to defend the following hypothesis: "The origin of the work of art" is a "frontier" work between these two moments of Heidegger, which is why it requires a "round trip" approach between the first and the second Heidegger. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Sapientia is the property of Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Tópicos is the property of Asociacion Revista de Filosofia de Santa Fe and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper aims to analyze the role of the equipment (Zeug) and its difference with the work of art in "The Origin of the Work of Art" in relation with what was developed in Being and Time. While the "ready-to-hand" is constituted by its remisional structure that the Dasein inaugurates, the art "disclose a world", disclose a new net of meaning, independently of the sense that the artist wanted to give it. That the art "shows the character of the equipment" does not mean that shows merely "the essence of a boot", but the remisional structure of the "ready-to-hand". The painting of Van Gogh's boots will work as an example to show the differences between the work and the equipment. In view of this interpretation we will analyze the critiques of Schapiro and Schaeffer to Heidegger's explanation of the painting of the Dutch painter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]