De la Mata, J. J., Morone, S., Macagno, A., Tschopp, J. C., Huguenine, E. E., Cedeño, A., and Bó, G. A.
In this study a new treatment protocol named Web-Synch for synchronization of ovulation was evaluated by the determination of the ovulation time and pregnancy rate at fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) in suckled beef cows. In Experiment 1, all cows (n=52) were randomly divided into three treatment groups. The Web-Synch treatment (n=19), Day 0: Prostaglandin F2α (PGF) + insertion of a progesterone (P4) - releasing device, Day 5: 0.02 mg busereline acetate (GnRH).The J-Synch treatment (n=15), Day 5: 2 mg estradiol benzoate (BE) + P4 device. The Co-Synch 6 d treatment (n=18), Day 5: GnRH + P4 device. On Day 11 devices were removed from all cows and received PGF and 105 IU of reCG. All animals that expressed estrus were inseminated on Day 14 (72 hours after device removal) and those that did not express estrus received GnRH and were inseminated at the same time. Transrectal ultrasonographic examinations were carried out to determine follicular diameter, ovulation rate and CL size after ovulation. In Experiment 2, cows (n=19) were randomly divided to receive four treatment groups in 2 x 2 factorial design. The Web-Synch treatment, Day 0: PGF + device with 0.7 g of P4 (n=5) or with 1.0 g of P4 (n=5), Day 5: 0.02 mg GnRH. The J-Synch treatment, Day 5: 2 mg BE + device with 0.7 g of P4 (n=5) or with 1.0 g of P4 (n=4). On Day 11 devices were removed and all cows received PGF and 105 IU of reCG. Cows were inseminated and were examined by ultrasonography as in the Experiment 1 to determine follicular growth, ovulation time and ovulation rate. In Experiment 3, suckled beef cows (n=213) were divided in a 2 x 2 factorial design as in Experiment 2, and were inseminated and evaluated for estrus and pregnancy rates at FTAI. In Experiment 1, ovulation rate did not vary among treatments, being 100, 83.3 and 80.0% for Web-Synch, Co-Synch 6 d and J-Synch groups, respectively (P>0.1). Follicular diameter at FTAI was greater in the Web-Synch and Co-Synch 6 d groups (11.8 ± 0.4 and 11.7 ± 0.5 mm, respectively) than in the J-Synch group (9.8 ± 0.6 mm; P<0.05). Corpus luteum volume did not differ among Web-Synch, CoSynch 6 d and J-Synch treatments (3208.0 ± 436.4, 3315.2 ± 510.9 and 3369.3 ± 415.3 mm3, respectively; P>0.1). In Experiment 2, in cows treated with the Web-Synch protocol, the largest follicle diameter was greater at 60, 72 and 84 h in comparison with that observed in the J-Synch protocol (P<0.05). However, the maximum follicular diameter did not differ between treatments (P>0.1). Ovulation rate and ovulation time did not vary between protocols, being 80.0% and 94.5 ± 3.5 h for the Web-Synch protocol, and 100% and 96.7 ± 5.1 h for the J-Synch protocol (P>0.1). In Experiment 3, estrus and pregnancy rates at FTAI did not differ between treatments, being 66.0 and 58.7% for the Web-Synch treatment and 58.0 and 54.1% for the J-Synch treatment (P>0.1). In conclusion, the Web-Synch protocol could be consider as a new alternative for synchronization of ovulation and FTAI in suckled beef cows. The high ovulation rate at the end of treatment, the induction of a prolonged proestrus and the acceptable pregnancy outcome define it as an encouraging alternative to the conventional estradiol-based treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]