Search

Copyright of Sociologia del Diritto is the property of FrancoAngeli srl and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural is the property of Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Financial deregulation was promoted in search of certain goals that, two decades after the beginning of the process, appear increasingly unattainable: to increase the capital base of productive concerns, making them stronger to face the cycle, to reduce the levels of debt, etc. This article argues that such objectives are now farther away than before deregulation and have become frankly improbable because deregulation has been gouverned by incomplete concepts. The path insinuated by the author to solve the problems posed by financial deregulation to the market economies is to look for a way to finish these processes, through a social struggle wich is only at its beginnings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]