The exponential advance of artificial intelligence and all other technologies unleashed within the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution have put us at the gates of a categorical turn for humanity. We are developing computers capable of self programming and being autonomous to the point that the initial programming has nothing to do with its subsequent evolution. That leads us to consider several dilemmas. On the one hand, the machines, endowed with "freedom", will end humanity or at least dehumanize it in such a way that by the hand of a mathematical algorithm, they will decide how the human race should be, which person is fit or not for life and what a turn science should take. We will become useless in a robotic world. On the other hand, by obeying a logical approach, humanity could be better, since there would be no room for evil. Human beings would have more time to travel, learn, think, play, love and all the wonders of the spirit, while the machines work and produce for us. There would be no pedophilia, racism or envy. However, could human creativity become "super-creativity" by harnessing the greater capacity of artificial intelligence? Would people's creativity simply be displaced by superior machine intelligence? Would we be playing God, inventing intelligent beings, but without conscience? Would we end humanity with ourselves for the unstoppable pride of our race? Would we have sufficient capacity to develop this technology in a controlled manner for our service? Daring questions but must find an answer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]