Search

Copyright of Ius et Praxis (07172877) is the property of Universidad de Talca and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Amauta 'Todo lo Humano es Nuestro' is the property of Universidad del Atlantico and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas is the property of Revista Faculdad de Derecho y Ciencias Politicas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The paper analyzes prohibitions regarding the use of evidence ("exclusionary rules") in German law. In the introduction, the theoretical foundations, based on Beling's doctrine of the "prohibitions on evidence", are explained. Then, the concept of prohibitions on evidence is defined and the existing prohibitions are systematized (1.). Next, a distinction between explicit and implicit prohibitions (based on constitutional law) is proposed, and both are explained in detail (2. and 3.). Finally, the possibility of an extensive effect ("fruit of the poisoned tree") of these prohibitions is discussed (4.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]