Search

Introduction: The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is a widely used tool in head and neck reconstructive surgery. It stands out as a relatively simple flap to achieve; it is versatile and has features that enable the reconstruction of complex head and neck defects. The aim of the study was to present our results using the RFFF in the reconstruction of seated defects in the head and neck area., Material and Methods: A retrospective, observational and analytical study that included 58 cases of RFFF interventions, performed between January 2002 and July 2019. The data studied were the age and sex of the patients, location of the tumour, histological type, previous radiation therapy, number of venous anastomoses performed in the surgery and body temperature in the immediate postoperative period, at 24 and 48hours following surgery., Results: The percentage of viable RFFF was 82.8%. None of the variables analysed appear to be a risk factor for flap failure. The most frequent cause of flap failure was venous thrombosis., Conclusions: Microvascularised flaps play an important role in reconstructive surgery, being the RFFF one of the most interesting for head and neck reconstruction. It is a very versatile tool that allows the reconstruction of many of the sites where the head and neck surgeon operates., (Copyright © 2020 Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The iatrogenic loss of the penis is a rare situation. We present a challenging case of deferred total penile reconstruction in a genetic male., Material and Methods: A 57-year-old man with the loss of the penis due to a penile abscess and necrosis secondary to penile curvature surgery. The reconstruction was performed over several operations using a radial forearm free flap (RFFF) and placement of a customised inflatable prosthesis a year later., Results: During the first operation, the penile abscess was drained, the necrotic residues were debrided and placement of hypogastric drainage. Seven weeks later, phalloplasty was performed with RFFF and a tube-in-tube neourethra was constructed. Multiple microsurgical anastomosis was performed, and the donor site was coated with a skin graft from the thigh of partial thickness. The surgery lasted 10hours and had the complication of hair growth in the neourethra, which required mechanical endoscopic depilation on repeated occasions. The patient regained penile sensitivity. Eighteen months after the phalloplasty, a Zephyr single-body inflatable prosthesis (Geneva, Switzerland) was implanted, using the tunica albuginea of the proximal corpus cavernosum. The patient was satisfied with the aesthetics and urinary and sensory function. Four months later, the patient is gaining confidence to consider penetration., Conclusions: Despite the risk of postoperative complications and the need for multiple operations, phallic reconstruction with RFFF and the placement of a customised prosthetic implant can improve urinary and sexual function secondary to the loss of the penis., (Copyright © 2016 AEU. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)