Search

Your search keyword '"Peer Review, Research ethics"' showing total 7 results
Start Over Descriptor "Peer Review, Research ethics" Language spanish; castilian
7 results on '"Peer Review, Research ethics"'

2. [Integrity and misconduct in biomedical research].

Author

Schonhaut B L

Subjects
Authorship, Biomedical Research standards, Chile, Conflict of Interest, Duplicate Publications as Topic, Humans, Pediatrics ethics, Pediatrics standards, Peer Review, Research standards, Periodicals as Topic standards, Plagiarism, Retraction of Publication as Topic, Biomedical Research ethics, Editorial Policies, Peer Review, Research ethics, Periodicals as Topic ethics, Scientific Misconduct ethics
Abstract

Editorial Boards of mainstream journals occasionally face ethical misconducts in received manus cripts. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) provides recommendations for editors on how to deal with suspected ethical misconduct in either received or published manuscripts. The manus cript is rejected when malpractice is observed during the peer review process, however, if the mis conduct is detected after the publication, the publication will be retracted. The Revista Chilena de Pediatría (Chilean Journal of Pediatrics) has not been exempt from these type of conflicts. In this article, we analyze different aspects regarding the lack of integrity in publications, such as authorship, plagiarism, and conflict of interest. We can conclude that malpractices take place mainly due to the lack of knowledge of the authors rather than intent to defraud. It is expected that this article will suc ceed in instructing and sensitizing our researchers on good practices in research and publication, and contribute, as far as possible, to prevent this actions in the manuscripts sent to our Journal.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. [Peer review: evidence and challenges].

Author

Schonhaut Berman L, Millán Klusse T, and Podestá López L

Subjects
Journal Impact Factor, Periodicals as Topic ethics, Periodicals as Topic standards, Peer Review, Research ethics, Peer Review, Research standards
Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Publication ethics and COPE.

Author

Bachelet VC

Subjects
Humans, Peer Review, Research standards, Periodicals as Topic standards, Publishing standards, Editorial Policies, Peer Review, Research ethics, Periodicals as Topic ethics, Publishing ethics
Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. [Fraud and misconduct in scientific publications].

Author

Matías-Guiu J and García-Ramos R

Subjects
Biomedical Research ethics, Humans, Peer Review, Research standards, Periodicals as Topic standards, Publishing ethics, Peer Review, Research ethics, Periodicals as Topic ethics, Scientific Misconduct ethics
Abstract

Introduction: Editors of scientific publications have, traditionally, been unaware of frauds and misconduct, being more concerned with subjects associated to impact or with editorial review. But, in the last few years they have been checking and reporting that there is misconduct in the scientific field, and furthermore, it is not uncommon., Method: The most common misconduct of authors is reviewed. These are seen as an infringement of the conditions that a scientific work must have, and include fraud, such as plagiarism, repeated publications or redundant publications. Their frequency and the perspectives from a publishing point of view are discussed., Conclusions: Many editors are demanding clear regulations to prevent misconduct. Editorial review and the provision of evaluation tools for reviewers are prevention, but not infallible formulas. What is most important could be that editorial teams be aware of its existence.

Published
2010

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results