Search

The adaptive immune response forms the basis of allograft rejection. Its weapons are direct cellular cytotoxicity, identified from the beginning of organ transplantation, and/or antibodies, limited to hyperacute rejection by preformed antibodies and not as an allogenic response. This resulted in allogenic response being thought for decades to have just a cellular origin. But the experimental studies by Gorer demonstrating tissue damage in allografts due to antibodies secreted by B lymphocytes activated against polymorphic molecules were disregarded. The special coexistence of binding and unbinding between antibodies and antigens of the endothelial cell membranes has been the cause of the delay in demonstrating the humoral allogenic response. The endothelium, the target tissue of antibodies, has a high turnover, and antigen-antibody binding is non-covalent. If endothelial cells are attacked by the humoral response, immunoglobulins are rapidly removed from their surface by shedding and/or internalization, as well as degrading the components of the complement system by the action of MCP, DAF and CD59. Thus, the presence of complement proteins in the membrane of endothelial cells is transient. In fact, the acute form of antibody-mediated rejection was not demonstrated until C4d complement fragment deposition was identified, which is the only component that binds covalently to endothelial cells. This review examines the relationship between humoral immune response and the types of acute and chronic histological lesion shown on biopsy of the transplanted organ., (Copyright © 2016 Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The diagnosis is based on typical findings observed using electron microscope (EM) and immunofluorescence (IF) studies. On some occasions, tissues are only available for analysis using an optical microscope (OM); in these cases, it can be difficult to differentiate between MN and minimal change disease (MCD). Recently, the use of C4d immunohistochemical staining has spread. Very little information is available regarding C4d deposits in MN. Our study consisted of analysing whether C4d staining of samples embedded in paraffin could be useful for diagnosing MN., Material and Method: Ours was a retrospective study including all patients diagnosed with MN by renal biopsy in our unit between January 2001 and October 2008. We only included adult patients with a definitive diagnosis of MN or idiopathic MCD by OM, IF, and ME studies. In October 2008, 3µm sections of renal tissue fixed in formaldehyde were removed from paraffin and rehydrated. The samples were then stained for C4d immunohistochemical analysis using anti-human polyclonal antibodies obtained from rabbits., Results: Our study included a final sample of 19 patients with MCD and 21 with MN. No C4d deposits were observed in any of the glomeruli in patients with MCD, and 100% of these patients were classified as negative. However, C4d deposits were detected in 100% of patients with MN, and were observable in all glomeruli with a uniform granular distribution, demarcating all capillary loops., Conclusions: C4d immunohistochemical staining is a very useful tool for diagnosing MN.