Search

Introduction: The treatment of bile duct calculi associated with cholelithiasis is controversial. The hospital costs could be a decisive factor in choosing between the different therapeutic options., Objectives: To compare the effectiveness and costs of two options in the treatment of common bile duct calculi: 1) One-stage: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration, and 2) Two-stage: sequential endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy., Material and Methods: A retrospective, observational study was performed on 49 consecutive patients with bile duct calculi and gallbladder in situ, treated consecutively and simultaneously over a two year period. The post-operate complication, hospital stay, number of procedures per patient, conversion to laparotomy, efficacy of removing the calculi, and hospital costs., Results: There were no differences as regards the patient clinical features or morbidity. The mean post-surgical hospital stay for the One-stage group was less than that in the Two-stage group. Three patients of the Two-stage group required conversion to laparotomy. The median costs per patient were less for the One-stage strategy, representing an overall saving of 37,173€ during the period studied., Conclusions: No significant differences were found between the two treatment options as regards efficacy or post-surgical morbidity and mortality, but there were differences in hospital stay and costs. The management of patients with gallstones in one-stage surgery represents a saving of 3 days hospital stay and 1,008€ per patient., (Copyright © 2011 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To establish the criteria that should be considered when analyzing the cost of digestive endoscopy and to determine how the variables studied influence the final results, as well as to determine the relative value unit (RVU) per endoscopic procedure., Material and Method: Clinical management study relating the cost of endoscopic procedures with their complexity, healthcare activity and direct and indirect countable costs. The endoscopic procedures performed from 2000-2001 (4,982 procedures) were analyzed. We determined the staff costs according to the hours devoted to endoscopic activity, the procedures performed and their complexity, non-amortizable and amortizable materials acquired in the study period, and the cost and amortization of apparatus and equipment., Results: The biannual cost was 392,892.60;. Staff costs were 63%, apparatus and equipment 15%, structural costs 13%, pharmacy 6%, materials 2% and amortizable materials 1%. The least expensive procedure was diagnostic gastroscopy (60.56;) and the most expensive was therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (277.06;). The RVU cost was 52.58;., Conclusions: Calculation of the cost of any medical procedure should take into account the strict application of direct and indirect costs. In our environment, the cost of endoscopy is lower than might be expected, mainly because the cost of amortization of apparatus and equipment and staff costs were low. Calculation of the complexity index is of considerable clinical and healthcare value. Determination of the RVU is a key element in establishing the cost of a procedure and in relating this cost with other costs, allowing its application as well as comparison among different investigations, services and centers.