Search

Objective: To identify the main problems affecting general practitioners (GPs) and specialists in the care of the main musculoskeletal problems in Catalonia., Method: Cross-sectional, self-administered survey in a representative sample of GPs and all specialists in four areas (orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, physical medicine and rehabilitation and pain units). Variables evaluated in the survey were related to socio-demographic data, attention to musculoskeletal diseases, self-declared expertise, referral process, coordination mechanisms and major constraints to provide high quality care., Results: GPs value well their expertise in the management of musculoskeletal diseases (6,7±1,0 on a scale of 1 to 10). Less than 25% of GPs are coordinated with hospital specialists. For them, waiting lists are the main problem (8.2±1,6/10) followed by lack of feedback (8±1,9/10) and poor coordination (7.8±1,9/10). Referenced specialties should change for some diseases (back pain and osteoarthritis). Specialists are critical for GPs. For specialists, the main problems are excessive workload (7,8±2/10) and the inefficiency of healthcare information systems (7.4±2/10)., Conclusions: The vision of the problems affecting the care of musculoskeletal diseases differs between GPs and hospital specialists. The limited accessibility and workload excess, deficiencies in the flow of information and poor coordination are the most important problems in the proper care for musculoskeletal diseases., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Primary care (PC) paediatricians are trained mainly in the hospital setting, with little contact with PC. This study aimed to find out what perceptions and experiences they have on the attributes of PC (first contact, comprehensiveness and continuity of care) that are assumed and performed by PC paediatricians., Material and Methods: A qualitative study was performed based on focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews with paediatricians with pre-defined sociodemographic and speciality training characteristics. Two focus groups (5 and 4 people each) and 5 interviews were made. Participants responded to two questions: how would you explain your function as a primary care paediatrician? and what is your opinion on the relationship between primary care paediatricians and the specialists to whom your patients are referred? The conversations of the groups and interviews were recorded and transcribed, and a content analysis was performed., Results: Paediatricians assume that PC must be comprehensive, and take into account the context of the child. Paediatricians declare a lack in their training and poor social and institutional recognition. Coordination with specialists and the transfer of information are not satisfactory. Helpful factors are personal knowledge, the shared training and the face-to-face clinical sessions., Conclusion: Despite their hospital-based training, paediatricians assume the attributes of PC. Difficulties in performing their function include poor adaptation of their training to PC, and little institutional and social recognition. Coordination with specialists is not satisfactory. Approaching these difficulties can help maintaining a high quality level in the care of the paediatric population., (Copyright © 2011 Asociación Española de Pediatría. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To describe the actual presence of smoking in restaurant and hospitality premises after the smoking prevention act banning smoking in workplaces came into force in 2006, with wide exemptions in this sector., Methods: We performed an observational, descriptive study in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) in 2008 based on cluster sampling, with 1130 premises. The results were stratified by premise type., Results: Up to 85.7% of food shops allowing consumption within their premises (bakeries, pastry shops...) ban smoking, as well as 85% of fast food establishments. Among restaurants, 40% are smoke-free or have separate smoking areas. Bar-cafés and café-restaurants (the most abundant premises) usually allow smoking. There are more smoke-free options in central districts and in shopping malls., Conclusions: Up to 75.4% of all premises allow smoking freely. These results show the limitations of the law., (Copyright 2009 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Background: Collecting and disseminating information about the public opinion on a regulatory process gives visibility to the silent social support and facilitates the process, which often confronts resistance from interest groups. This paper presents a survey about a proposed legislation on tobacco in its final stages and its results, and some considerations on the use of this sort of information in change processes., Methods: Cross sectional descriptive study. In December 2005 a brief telephone survey was made to a population sample of 18 and more years of age (N=830) in Catalonia (Spain). The questionnaire explored opinions on the proposed regulations under discussion. We present the degree of support and the rating of nine regulatory measures, stratified by the respondents use of tobacco., Results: Daily smokers are 26.3% of the surveyed population. Awareness and general support for tobacco regulation are very high. Aspects with wider support include bans on sales to minors (97.3%), smoking in enclosed public places (92.8%) and workplaces (89%), and publicity (90.8%). The aspect with less social support is banning smoking in bars and cafes (80.2%)., Conclusions: The population supports widely tobacco regulation. This reinforces the process and weakens the arguments of those against it. Although smokers are less supportive, most of them accept the regulations, except for limitations in bars and cafes.