Search

The Republic of Serbia represents an employer for civil servants and employees, for employees who perform tasks within the scope of state administration bodies, courts, public prosecutors' offices, for police officers as a separate category of civil servants, etc. The regulation of the labor legal status of these persons is also carried out through the conclusion of special collective agreements in addition to the normative. A significant part of the state administration is made up of public services that, by their significance and manner of carrying out tasks of general interest, as well as by the method of financing, represent the central level of the state that encompasses the entities which are responsible for the provision of predominantly non-market services which the state is obliged to provide in order to meet the general needs of its people. The concept of administration has been established as a profession of general interest. Administration carried out by the state authorities itself is viewed in a narrower sense, and when we look at the administration through public services or public administration, we have to bear in mind that non-state actors are also entrusted with administrative activities. Based on the nature of their work, state authorities have a significant administrative function in regulating tasks and prerequisites which are important for collective negotiations in the public sector. The state administration also carries out registration of social partners, tasks related to determining the representativeness of social partners, registration of collective agreements and decision-making on the extended effect of the collective agreement. Relevant authorities, councils, state administration boards and special organizations perform their activities through tripartite and bipartite social dialogue, and decisions are made by consensus. The state administration performs and ensures the performance of state functions important for collective negotiations in the public sector, conducts a procedure for obtaining the authority of representatives of state bodies and public services to start, negotiate and conclude a collective agreement. Also, the state administration has an active role in the process of registration of the collective agreements, as well as in the obligatory mediation and conciliation and arrangement of the minimum work process in activities of general interest. The state administration maintains the legal order and secures public interest through the procedure of concluding and applying collective agreements in the public sector. Through the realization of these activities, the participation of state entities in the conclusion of collective agreements opens the question of the legal nature of collective agreements, that is, leaves the possibility for the analysis and comparison of the collective agreement and the administrative contract. Collective agreement is a general act, but in its adoption, administrative-legal relationship is recognized as a significant relationship which is regulated by numerous norms of international and national law. Both contracts are concluded with the agreement of the contracting parties, and with the reduced authoritative function of the state administration. A particularly collective association of state bodies and public services can be considered as social acts that regulate rights, obligations and responsibilities from the employment of public sector employees, which contain mandatory and normative parts, but each is an autonomous source of labor law in the public sector.

Принуђена да изнађе адекватан образац за неочекивано повраћену државност, Србија је почела трагање за путоказима из сопственог историјског искуства. Потрага за српским уставним идентитетом као основом примереног уставног модела за Србију морала се, логично, окренути блиставим умовима чије су идеје уграђене у темеље модерне српске државе. У том смислу, XIX век нуди прегршт поузданих смерница, садржаних у концепцијама плејаде најумнијих људи тога доба. Поједини од тих великана који су својим знањем, енергијом и ентузијазмом омогућили убрзано путешествије Србије од заостале турске провинције до узорне европске државе, били су предмет интересовања научних посленика, док су неки други остали изван видокруга проучавалаца прошлости српског народа. У том смислу, ова монографија написана је у право време. Намера пишчева била је да у низу размишљања из личног угла укаже на „знакове поред пута“, које су нам у завештање оставили великани из наше прошлости. Едиција Монографије ; књ. 30

Following the signing of the 1718 peace agreement in Pozarevac, the Serbian territories south of Sava and Danube joined the Habsburg monarchy. The newly formed country was named “The Kingdom of Serbia” and was under the rule of the representatives of the Court War Council (Hofkriegsrath) and the Court Chamber Council (Hofkammer) until the Austro-Hungarian war from 1737 to 1739. The topics examined in the following chapters relate to the administrative services which endeavoured to enforce the state policies within the key segments relevant to the society. By establishing the Belgrade Administration, the organisation of governance was divided into sections whose operational field grew over time. The Forestry administration controlled the distribution of the forest resources, for the requirements of the state on one hand, and on the other, for the needs of the public. A more detailed analysis of the public life in villages of the Serbian districts has been examined from the registers which contained data used by the chamber authorities for a more precise calculation of tax duties. The migratory movements depended on the state authorities’ competency to establish a uniform tax system, not only in Serbia, but in other newly conquered states of the Habsburg Monarchy. A particular emphasis in this study is placed on the customs administration, by underlining the royal legal directives which regulated this area. Their aim was a more effective regulation of mercantilistic politics established much earlier, while the inclusion of trade companies with monopolistic privileges initiated a commercial breakthrough to the East. The widespread activities of the Administration in formulating the economic life in Serbia are additionally presented through organisation of the mining industry, where the stockholder Unions had a leading role. New data cited in the study are followed by enclosures in the form of historical maps and construction graphs which have not been published either in the national or international historiography to date.

Razvoj istraživanja u oblasti heritologije neophodan je uslov za funkcionisanje svih institucija zaštite kulturne baštine u Srbiji, koje su prirodom svoga delovanja i kulturnom politikom Evropske Unije upućene na intenzivnu saradnju sa evropskim institucijama, posebno institucijama Republike Italije. Imajući u vidu da je oblast heritologije multidisciplinarna u opsegu od prirodnih i tehničkih nauka, do društveno-humanističkih i umetničkih disciplina, u razvoju institucija neophodna je podrška državne uprave, koja može da prati multidisciplinarni spoj nauke i umetnosti. U ovom radu biće prikazana analiza konkretnih problema uticaja raspodele nadležnosti u državnoj upravi na razvoj institucija zaštite baštine u Srbiji. Development of research in the field Heritology is an indispensable condition for the functioning of the institutions of cultural heritage in Serbia, which in the intensive cooperation with European institutions, especially institutions of the Republic of Italy. Bearing in mind that field of Heritology is multidisciplinary in scope than the natural and technical sciences, the humanities, social and artistic disciplines, the development of institutions need the support of state government, which should allow the development multidisciplinary blend of science and art. In this paper it will be the analysis of specific influences of the state administration on the development of institutions of heritage protection in Serbia. Tematski zbornik radova