Search

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is one the most common allergic diseases affecting from 10 to 40% of the population in different countries, including Russia. AR is a risk factor of bronchial asthma, other upper airway disease and may decrease patient quality of life, their productivity, increase probability of occupational traumatism, depression and anxiety. AR also presents a substantial economic burden. The rationale to use fixed dose combination of intranasal steroids and topical H1 antihistamines includes suboptimal control of symptoms by monotherapy, its complementary pharmacologic activity and the results of clinical trials. This review focused on fixed dose combination of intranasal mometasone furoate and olopataine. Double blind placebo-controlled and open clinical trials have confirmed that this combination decreased severity of nasal and ocular symptoms of seasonal and perennial AR, improved patient quality of life and had a good tolerability. Its efficacy was higher than those of monotherapy. Fast onset of action and sustainable effect on symptoms (during 1 yr) may improve adherence patients to the treatment and control of symptoms of AR.

Aim. To assess the efficacy and safety of Vamloset (amlodipine/valsartan 5/80, 5/160, 10/160 mg) and Co-Vamloset (amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide 10/160/12.5, 10/160/25 mg) in achieving the target levels of blood pressure (BP) in patients with stage 23 arterial hypertension (AH). The article discusses indicators affecting adherence to antihypertensive therapy (AHT). Material and methods. The VICTORY II Russian study in 8 clinical centers of the Russian Federation included 103 patients over 18 years of age with stage 23 essential AH (who havent been previously treated and have office systolic BP160 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP100 mm Hg or who havent reached the target office blood pressure with mono- or double AHT). The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for efficacy analysis included 99 patients, a FAS population with the restoration of data missed using Last Observation Carried Forward. The SF-36 questionnaire for assessing the quality of life, the effect on erectile function in men, the convenience of current therapy from the point of view of patients were analyzed after 16 weeks of treatment. The Per Protocol (PP) population included 80 patients completing the study without major protocol deviations to assess the primary parameters of efficacy. All patients with stage 2 hypertension were prescribed Vamloset (amlodipine/valsartan 5/80 mg), with stage 3 hypertension amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg. Dose titration of Vamloset and Co-Vamloset (LLC Krka-RUS) was carried out every 4 weeks according to the AHT schemes. Results. The studys active phase included 100 patients aged 59.510.9 years (women 59%) with AH duration of 83.48.4 months; 83% of patients received AHT prior inclusion in the study. In the PP population, 16 week- AHT with Vamloset or Co-Vamloset allowed reaching the target BP in 90.0% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.295.6). Overall clinical efficacy was achieved in 98.8% of patients (95% CI 93.2100.0). All treatment regimens were characterized by high patient compliance. In the total group, 50% of patients rated their AHT as more convenient than they had previously used; of them, in the stage 2 AH group 47.8%, in the stage 3 AH group 53.3%. Metabolic neutrality with regard to at least one indicator was observed in 100% of patients, with regard to 6 indicators in 43.9% [33.9; 54.9]. For all 98 patients included in the analysis, changes in all SF-36 scales, except for physical functioning (p=0.339), were statistically significant (p0.05). The effect of AHT on erectile function was rated as positive in 51.3% of men. Good tolerance data are consistent with the established drug safety profile. Conclusion. In the VICTORY II study, high antihypertensive efficacy and an improvement in a set of indicators of optimal adherence to AHT by Vamloset and Co-Vamloset within 16 weeks were proved in patients with stage 23 AH. Patients high rating for quality improvement in the quality of life, safety of therapy and ease of use ensured optimal compliance of Vamloset and Co-Vamloset therapy throughout the study.

Insufficient control of blood pressure levels of the essential hypertension in Russia (less than 30% for women, less than 20% for men) was proven by epidemiology trials. This article is a review of the present opportunities to increase efficacy of treating hypertension by application of combined anti-hypertensive therapy and the advantages of fixed dose combinations (FDC). The authors scientifically prove the importance of using the combination, including angiotensin I-converting enzyme perindopril arginine and the long-half time dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker amlodipine in various clinical cases. Also the article summarizes the research of real clinical practice proving the high efficiency and safety of perindopril arginine /amlodipine FDC.

A great number of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma require combination therapy with several hypotensive drugs of different pharmacological groups to efficiently compensate the intraocular pressure (IOP) and prevent further development of glaucoma. Although glaucoma treatment usually starts with monotherapy, several preparations administered simultaneously have stronger hypotensive effect further increased by their additive action. However, the increased frequency of instillations may lead to drug washout and decreased patient compliance. Fixed dose combinations (FDCs) are a pharmacological form of eye drops that combines two or more active drugs in a single dosage form. The frequency of FDCs administration does not exceed two per day, which is convenient for long-term application and helps improve patient compliance. FDCs tolerability tends to be higher than that of simultaneous instillations of separate monotherapy drugs, while the hypotensive in clinical trials is comparable, in some real practice trials is superior. A review of existing studies showed that FDCs are superior to monotherapy in terms of cost-effectiveness. The use of FDCs was found to be beneficial for glaucoma treatment from the viewpoints of both reaching the target IOP for preserving visual functions in glaucoma patients, and minimizing the long-term treatment costs.