Search

Bearing in mind the evolutionary aesthetics of Dennis Dutton, which defines art as a biological instinct, taking into account other evolutionary theories, utilizing the logic of experimental aesthetics that began in the history of aesthetics with Fechner's aesthetics, Chatterjee with his book The Aesthetic Brain, empirically succeeded in deepening, clarifying the most powerful theory of art, namely Dennis Dutton's evolutionary aesthetics. Interestingly, his empirical result is that neuro-aesthetics cannot encompass art as a whole and that there is no neural network devoted to aesthetics. Of great benefit to aesthetics is his attempt to find a solution to the dilemma, Is art a biological instinct or a cultural by-product of life? The idea of art as an instinct is accepted because it implies that art is a much deeper, integral part of our being, a universal human preoccupation. Although scientists usually define art as a biological instinct or as an evolutionary by-product, Chatterjee defines empirical art as universal cultivation in our brains, and as diverse shaped by history. By integrating neuro-aesthetics with evolutionary aesthetics, leading them to a challenging synthesis, utilizing data from psychology, biology, philosophy, art history, and neurology, he will empirically prove that the link between biology and art is very deep. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]