Search

Aim. To compare the efficiency of removable mini-implant retained dentures using different types of attachment.Materials and methods. The study included 51 edentulous patients. The patients were divided into three groups according to the attachment type and abutment shape: 1) ball-and-socket attachment, ball abutment (n = 26); 2) locator attachment, equator abutment, XiVE LOCATOR system (n = 14); 3) bar attachment (n = 11). Removable dentures were made of ordinary acrylic plastic. The placement of intraosseous dental implants with their sublingual engraftment was performed according to the traditional two-stage delayed-load procedure. The efficiency of implants was evaluated using the method of M.Z. Mirgazizov and the eponymous index. The dynamics of vertical bone resorption around implants was determined using dental panoramic radiography (6 months, 1 and 2 years after the treatment). A periotest was performed 6 months after the end of the orthopaedic treatment.Results. The one-year survival rate of implants reached 96.2% in group 1, amounting to 100% in groups 2 and 3. The two-year survival rate came to 92.3% in group 1, reaching 92.9% and 100% in groups 2 and 3, respectively. Inflammatory phenomena characteristic of peri-implantitis were noted one year after the implant placement in 7.7% (n = 2) of patients in group 1 and in 7.1% of patients in group 2, with no inflammatory phenomena being observed in group 3. Two years after the implant placement, peri-implantitis was observed in 19.2% and 21.4% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively, coming to 9.1% in group 3. The periotest revealed that six months after the placement, implant stability was higher in group 3 for both the lower and upper jaw (in comparison with groups 1 and 2), as evidenced by the shift in periotest values towards the negative part of the scale.Conclusion. The study revealed that bar attachment, as well as locator attachment (equator abutments), of removable dentures supported by mini implants is more efficient as compared to the ball-and-socket attachment.

The Aim of the Study: Comparative study of the precision of the junction of modern implant systems with standard and custom abutments., Materials and Methods: The study was carried out by the method of computed X-ray microtomography on an X-ray microtomograph Heliscan micro CT using the ImageJ program in the laboratory «Systems for Microscopy and Analysis» of the Skolkovo Technopark. The measurement of the gap width between the implant and the abutment for each sample was carried out at 20 points according to the algorithm: the total length of the connection between the implant and the abutment; step (distance) between 5 equidistant points along the contact between the abutment and the implant; the measurements were repeated in 2 perpendicular sections along the joint node axis. The study was conducted on the example of seven implant systems common in Russia. The effect on the implant-abutment assembly of a multiple functional load of 250 N at an angle of 45° (7.6 million cycles) was studied., Results: It has been established that the precision of the junction of modern implants with standard abutments is different and is characterized by the length of the contact from 268 to 1300 µm, the gap at the level of the platform from 5.0 to 11.7 µm, and the asymmetry of the contact in diameter by 2.4-14.2 µm. Abutments individually made in modern CAD/CAM laboratories do not have significant dimensional differences with standard abutments, but they have technological defects. The functional load expands and deforms the gap between the implant and abutment junction in the upper half of their contact., Conclusion: The results obtained demonstrate the capabilities of the computer X-ray microtomography method, which can be used to control the quality of manufacturing collapsible dental implants, the accuracy of manufacturing individual abutments in CAD/CAM laboratories, as well as in the development of new dental implant systems. The dimensional parameters of the junction node determine the advantages of the deep cone connection of the implant and the abutment.