Search

The present work aims to present a series of aspects regarding, on the one hand, the diversity of Roma groups present in the Bereasca community in the city of Ploiești, and on the other hand, the relations between Roma and Romanians and the mutual influence between the two ethnic groups from a linguistic and cultural point of view. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Studii de Ştiintă şi Cultură is the property of Studii de Stiinta si Cultura and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In the process of radical transformation of contemporaneous society the all social and political structure has modified, all political and social institutes inclusively family has modified, too. Family, as an integral part of social system, reflects all the process, which take place in society. Because the family is the basic institute which is accountable for political socialization process, in the Republic of Moldova a special attention is given to family. In the family young people receive those emotional conditions, that knowledge and formation of abilities, that far are on the base of process of socialization and political socialization, as a process of formation political culture and general human culture. The family, which ensures affective circumstances where social relations are established, is the base of these processes. In the family ensure social identity of person which contributes to formation basic behavior acquirement of the person in society. Thanks to emotional-affective factor, the family is institution where the children has better conditions for assimilation of useful acquirement for life, and for integration in political domain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two recent studies about Mihail Sebastian written by two important Romanian literary critics re-open the debate around several key topics: the relationship between the cultural assimilation of the Jews and right wing extremism, the limits of aestheticism (both as a way of life and as a critical method), the importance of biography, factual data for understanding artistic achievements, the status of fiction, among others. Although their interests seem different, Mihai Iovănel and Marta Petreu seem to share the assumption that the literary object no longer has something valuable to offer when faced with the overpowering clarity of the ideological understanding of literature. I beg to differ and subsequently I would like to show that neglecting the literary object could make one entirely miss an essential ideological dimension of the writer in question. In this particular case, the marginal ambivalent identity of the "stranger" shared by Sebastian with many other modern Jewish writers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Considering the psychological crime as an individual personality commitment involved in criminal acts emphasis is on the concept of social immaturity, as the specificity of delinquency. The concept of social maturation insufficient highlight problems of social integration, conflict with the requirements of a particular normative value system, emphasizing disorders of structuring social relations. From these positions are highlighted dealing with juvenile insufficient assimilation requirements and socio-cultural norms (social deficit) and lack of adjustment to the social processes through acts of deviant behavior. Thus, the fundamental characteristic of these subjects is dissonant nature of social maturity and therefore personality development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]