1. Prognostic Significance of Nutrition-Associated Markers in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Author
-
Meng Y, Zhang Z, Zhao T, and Zhang D
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Aged, Prognosis, Stroke Volume, Nutritional Status, Patient Readmission, Heart Failure
- Abstract
Background: The prognostic significance of nutrition indicators in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear., Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prognostic value of serum albumin (SA), the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with HFpEF., Methods: Databases of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for all studies published up to January 2022. The prognostic significance of SA, GNRI, and PNI for HFpEF was explored. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using the STATA 15.0 software. The Quality of Prognosis Studies tool was used to assess the quality of studies., Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, and 5603 adults with HFpEF were included in the meta-analysis. The analyses showed that a decreased SA or GNRI was significantly related to high all-cause mortality (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.282-3.057; p = 0.002; and HR: 1.812;95% CI: 1.064-3.086; p = 0.029, respectively). Furthermore, a lower SA indicates a bad composite outcome of all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization (HR: 1.768; 95% CI: 1.483-2.108; p = 0.000), and a lower GNRI was significantly associated with high cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.922; 95% CI: 1.504-2.457;p = 0.000). However, a lower PNI did not correlate with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.176; 95% CI: 0.858-1.612, p=0.314)., Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicates that SA and GNRI may be useful indicators to predict the prognosis of patients with HFpEF.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF