Search

This paper aims to retrace the evolution of Brazil/French Guiana/Surinam cross-border cooperation. Initially focused on questions of border control and surveillance, this cooperation has gradually extended to the economic, social and cultural fields. Through various instruments (Joint Cross-border Commissions, River Councils, INTERREG Amazonia cooperation program), integrating public and private actors operating at different territorial levels, this cooperation aims to promote the process of integration between border territories and contributes to the emergence of a coordinated strategy around the shared development needs of states separated from French Guiana by a common international border.

One of the strategies indicated in academic research on regional development corresponds to geographically concentrated productive agglomerations, based on the organization of network agents to obtain competitive advantages through territorial cooperation practices. In this sense, the article aimed to analyze the social capital and the conduction of local governance in the context of the Cluster of Furniture of the Southwest of Paraná. The present research is classified as exploratory descriptive, with a quanti-qualitative approach, based on the method of documental analysis and structured interviews. The questionnaire was the main instrument of data collection in a research with the set of agents of the productive arrangement, including nineteen cluster business owners, five support agents and local governance. The results of the research pointed to good levels of social capital in the analyzed cluster, with positive indicators regarding the degree of contribution in the relationship, trust and cooperation between the agents, in the quality and usefulness of the information exchanged. The metrics of the social network (density and reciprocity) resulted in median values, while the question of participation in meetings obtained the worst results. Regarding the evaluation of local governance, all elements analyzed resulted in values considered to be weak. In summary, the evaluation of the binomial social capital and local governance has shown that for the effective execution of joint actions in line with territorial cooperation practices, it is fundamental to have a more active local governance in the management of cluster. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper addresses the issue of territorial cooperation as a necessary principle and requisite for a better local and regional development. It is argued that as important as the design of policies with the objective of sustainable territorial development is the way in which these are decided, designed and implemented. As important as 'What' is 'How'. The text is divided into three large blocks. The first one deals with cooperation as a transversal category that applies from three approaches: government and State administration, theories of regional and local economic development, and from the point of view of spatial planning and territorial cohesion; at several scales, therefore with multilevel nature and diverse geographical coverage (international, European, Spanish and Valencian). In the following two sections, examples of cooperation experiences and results obtained (at different scales and between different subjects) are presented as a tool for territorial development in rural areas, first, and tourism, afterwards. The text closes with a brief final synthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Historic developments that occurred in the last centuries have affected the barrier effect of national borders in Europe and, consequently, the degree and the intensity of the cooperation between neighbouring countries. However, the establishment of the European Single Market, in the last three decades, has deepened the cross-border cooperation inside the EU Territory. In this respect, the INTERREG-A initiative has played a major role, since 1990. This article intends to shed some light on the progress of the cross-border cooperation in the Swedish-Norwegian border region, and the territorial effects of the INTERREG-A programme in the reduction of the barrier effect along the border in five dimensions (institutional-urban, accessibility, culture-social, environmental-heritage and economy-technology).

This paper examines the role and importance of the territorial dimension of EU Cohesion Policy, during its five programming phases (1989‑2020), by relating this implementation process with several territorial elements, and by assessing their constant changes, namely in three main components and related elements: (i) the ‘policy strategy’ designed to include an integrated territorial perspective; (ii) the ‘policy impacts’ in territorial development and territorial cohesion, together with the use of territorial impact assessment procedures; and (iii) the focus on one or several ‘territorial scales’, specifically through the support to multilevel‑governance, territorial cooperation, and place‑based strategies. Paradoxically, despite the continuous attempts to detach EU Cohesion Policy from its initial goals of promoting a more cohesive Europe into a more neoliberalist paradigm type of ‘investment Policy’, our analysis showed that the territorial dimension is still very much anchored with this Policy, and even gaining importance in several territorial related elements, such as the support to territorial cooperation and governance processes, and the use of territorial impact assessment procedures.