Search

Health care for patients with serious illnesses usually implies the need to make a large number of decisions, ranging from how information is shared to which diagnostic or therapeutic procedures will be adopted. The method of such decision-making has important implications from an individual and collective point of view and may contribute to either relieving or aggravating suffering. In this consensus document, the Bioethics Committee of the Brazilian National Academy of Palliative Care (ANCP) and the Permanent Committee on Palliative Care of the Brazilian Geriatrics and Gerontology Society (SBGG) adopt the principles of compassionate listening proposed by Saunders, of the nature of suffering proposed by Cassel, of dignity-preserving care proposed by Chochinov, and of cultural humility as a starting point for the construction of an official position of ANCP and SBGG on shared decision-making in palliative care. The position statement posits that, unlike paternalistic and consumerist models, the decision-making process in the sphere of palliative care must follow the mutualistic model of shared decision, where decisions are built based on dialogue between healthcare professionals and patients/family. The document sets forth the assumptions of this process, the limits of autonomy of patients/family and healthcare professionals and the distinction between futile and potentially inappropriate treatments, besides ratifying its incompatibility with any forms of coercion and conflict of interest foreign to the best interests of patients.

Objectives: to reflect on the daily life of family members dependent on psychoactive substances and the role of health professionals in Primary Care., Methods: a descriptive investigation outlined in Maffesoli's phenomenological approach, carried out at a Basic Health Unit in Minas Gerais with eight family members dependent on psychoactive substances. Sociodemographic characterization data and in-depth interviews were collected and analyzed with support of NVivo Pro11® software. All ethical and legal aspects were met., Results: physicians were the professionals most mentioned in participants' statements, who took on a dubious role with other health professionals: welcoming (positive perceptions about care received) and neglect (negative perceptions)., Final Considerations: dependence on psychoactive substances imposes a burden on persons, their family members and health professionals. The role of establishing good relationships in the triad professionals-users-family members of primary care is inseparable in favor of treatment and preservation of their mental health.

Perioperative antibiotic administration can decrease surgical morbidity, shorten hospitalization, while lowering the overall costs attributable to infections. Its use in surgery is widespread and often inappropriate. In this study, the authors evaluate the guidelines for selection and use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgical cancer patients at the Hospital of Cancer in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. During 36 non-consecutive months, 1681 cancer patients submitted to surgical procedures were prospectively followed-up by members of the Hospital Infection Control Committee. The overall surgical site infection (SSI) and mortality rates were 17.7% and 4.8% respectively. Prophylactic antibiotics were used in 1262 elective surgeries (75.1%), and their use was not considered to be in accordance with the recommended protocol in 37.6% of the cases. The inadequate antimicrobial prophylaxis resulted in higher incidence of SSI than did prophylaxis in according to the protocol (21.7% vs. 16.4, Relative Risk 1.32; 95% Confidence Internal 1.05-1.67; p0.01). This study calls the attention for the need of a more strict and determined educational program in order to provide mechanisms for an adequate administration of prophylactic antibiotics to patients submitted to high-risk surgeries.

Over a period of 24 months, patients undergoing surgical procedures for head and neck cancer at the Cancer Hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil were followed-up prospectively for identification of surgical wound risk factors. A total of 273 patients fulfilling the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) surgical criteria completed the analysis. The overall wound infection rate was 25.3%. Of the 11 potential risk factors for postoperative wound infections analysed by stepwise multiple logistic regression, the five variables that were independent of each other and highly predictive were patient undergoing an operation classified as either contaminated or infected, a surgery lasting longer than 5 hours, an American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) preoperative assessment score of 4 and 5, age over 50 years and prior radiotherapy. The preoperative stay, antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical drains, preoperative nutritional status, sex and the presence of prior infection did not have an independent significant contribution to the risk of infection. This study reports specific risk factors for head and neck cancer surgeries and contributes substantially to the effectiveness of infection control strategies to prevent their occurrence in this high-risk group of patients.