DISCOURSE analysis, POLITICAL communication, LANGUAGE & languages, POLITICIANS
Abstract
Copyright of Revista de Estudos da Linguagem is the property of Revista de Estudos da Linguagem and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
*DISCOURSE analysis, *NOUN phrases (Grammar), *SEMIOTICS, *ENUNCIATION, *HISTORY of linguistics
Abstract
In this paper I show that the theories of discourse are distinguished according to the way they consider the subject that speaks, as origin or as effect. I then discuss the conception of subject utilized by French semiotics, that of subject as effect. French semiotics sees enunciation as a linguistic instance that is presupposed by the enunciate, and sees the enunciator as a result of the enunciate, which is "what makes the subject be". Further, French semiotics understands communication as an act that is non-voluntary and nonconscious. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published
2007
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.