Search

Hooke's law establishes a direct relationship between the applied force and deformation triggered on an object, with the elastic constant being the proportionality factor. Introductory Physics courses usually address Hooke's law in the context of real springs. This paper proposes a complementary didactic approach to the topic "elasticity of materials", considering a microscopic model in wich the interatomic bonding behave like springs. Thus, the elastic constant of these structures can be predicted by an extremely simple closed formula in the case of periodic systems. Particularly, monolayer hexagonal boron nitride structures were modeled from a series-parallel combination of identical springs. The model was developed within the linear approach of elasticity to ensure theoretical simplicity. A study was conducted to establish an optimal value corresponding to this regime, and 1.8% was determined as the maximum strain. The model was tested via atomistic computational simulations, being able to accurately predict the values of the elastic constants of the structures. Finally, the proposed approach proved to be didactically simple and interesting in introductory Physics or Engineering courses, mainly for the confirmation of the validity of the usual rules of spring combination in the microscopic domain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spring associations are often explored in Physics teaching through a theoretical model that defines the equivalent elastic constant of a set of springs in parallel as the sum of the spring constants of each of the associated springs. Like any scientific model, this representation is constructed by assuming a series of idealizations that delimit its validity domain. In the mentioned model, it is assumed that, when a force is applied, the associated springs extend equally, that is, they present a same deformation. For the case where two springs are used to sustain an object vertically, we will hardly have this condition respected In this paper, we present a discussion about the association of two springs in parallel from the perspective of the Bunge modeling process. We propose an expansion of the traditionally explored theoretical model considering the association of two parallel springs that do not deform equally. We also present an empirical comparison of the traditional model and the proposed expanded model. We understand that the discussion built has the potential to, besides providing the mobilization of basic physics knowledge, foster discussions about the representational role of scientific knowledge, enabling situations that demand reflection on the nature of Science. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]