Search

This article indicates that the traditional model of full-time employment based on an employment contract for an unfixed term – where the employee carries out a certain kind of work under the guidance of the employer and in a location and at times designated by the employer – becomes doubtful for some categories of employees (e.g. top managers, advisers, experts, those compiling various assessments and evaluations, providing legal and financial-economic services, giving lectures, providing various forms of mediation and agency, investor supervision). From the macro point of view and from the organizational point of view, we must answer the questions: what employment policy should be led towards a given category of labour resources, either flexible or stable; and how to avoid the accusation of a discrimination practice within the same category of employees. This article analyses selected atypical forms of employment in Poland and their impact on the labour market.

Copyright of Zarządzanie Innowacyjne w Gospodarce i Biznesie is the property of Akademii Humanistyczno-Ekonomicznej and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeszyty Prawnicze Biuro Analiz Sejmowej is the property of Kancelaria Sejmu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeszyty Prawnicze Biuro Analiz Sejmowej is the property of Kancelaria Sejmu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeszyty Prawnicze Biuro Analiz Sejmowej is the property of Kancelaria Sejmu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeszyty Prawnicze Biuro Analiz Sejmowej is the property of Kancelaria Sejmu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeszyty Prawnicze Biuro Analiz Sejmowej is the property of Kancelaria Sejmu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Studies in Law & Economics / Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne is the property of Lodz Scientific Society / Lodzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In the author's opinion, proposals regarding levelling rights of employees - other members of close family taking maternity leave (or parental one) - with rights of an employee - father raising a child, extending deadline for an employee to apply for correction of a work certificate, and applying to a labour court for correction of this document are justified. Significant doubts are related to introduction of the possibility of issuing by the court a decision replacing the certificate of employment. Finally, a positive opinion concerns the proposed amendment to Article 1050 of the Code of Civil Procedure, consisting introduction of the principle that enforcement of non-pecuniary benefits in the field of labour law, may be carried out before a court of an alternating jurisdiction, what will facilitate a lawyer submission of an application for such enforcement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author is critical of the proposed amendments, as they - in particular - do not abide by the principles of sound legislation. He also points out that the amended Act establishes an exceptional and one-sided protection of employees without taking into account the interest of the employer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An analysis of the amendments to the Act is focused on the introduction to the Polish labour law of a prohibition against issuing promissory notes, a declaration of submission to enforcement procedure and acknowledgment of debt as means to secure the claims of the employer against an employee arising from the employment relationship. The author gives a positive opinion on the general direction of changes proposed in the bill, due especially to the need to achieve axiological coherence of the legal system. However, he calls into question the relevance of the choice of instruments to be used for this purpose, According to the author, particularly, the acceptance of the effect in the form of invalidity of a promissory note issued by an employee to secure future claims of the employer would constitute a breach of the Convention, binding the Republic of Poland, providing a Uniform Law for Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author is critical about the failure by the authors of the bill to respect the principles of sound legislation, and claims, inter alia, that terms used in the bill is not coherent with that applied in other legislative acts. Additionally, he raises doubts as to whether the proposed amendments are consistent with Article 7 of Annex I to the Convention providing a Uniform Law for Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]