Search

Background and Aim: Edaravone is known for its efficacy in inhibiting free radical formation, activating microglia, and promoting neurogenesis and neuroprotection following acute ischemic stroke. This clinical trial aimed to investigate the effects of Edaravone on clinical symptoms and oxidative stress factors in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: In this clinical trial, fifty-two patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke were randomly assigned to receive either Edaravone (120 mg daily up to 3 doses intravenously) or a placebo in addition to standard treatment. Stroke severity was assessed using the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) at hospitalization and three months post-stroke. Antioxidant capacity, protein oxidation, and lipid peroxidation levels were measured during hospitalization and three days later. Results: Twenty-six patients were included in each group and were matched in terms of risk factors, neurological symptom severity, antioxidant capacity, protein oxidation, and lipid peroxidation at hospitalization. At the three-month follow-up, both groups showed a decrease in neurological symptom severity, with a slightly higher reduction observed in the Edaravone group, though not statistically significant (P=0.256). A similar proportion of patients achieved an MRS score of ≤2 within three months post-stroke in both groups (23.1% in the placebo group vs. 30.8% in the Edaravone group, P=0.755). All eight deaths within the first three months occurred in the placebo group. The most common side effect was intracerebral hemorrhage (13.5%), predominantly in the placebo group. Despite higher mean antioxidant capacities in the intervention group, no significant difference was observed post-intervention. Conclusion: The study suggests that adding Edaravone to standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke may lead to improved patient outcomes. However, further research with larger sample sizes is needed to establish the efficacy of this medication.

Introduction: Breast cancer is the leading cause of malignancy related deaths in women worldwide. In 20%-30% of breast cancers, HER2 gene amplification or overexpression is observed. Determination of HER2 amplification is performed mainly by IHC technique to measure its protein expression on the cell surface and by FISH to check gene amplification. This study was aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of IHC in comparison to the FISH method for detection of HER2 gene amplification. Methods: In this study which was performed in 2020, 44 paraffin embedded breast carcinoma tissues belonging to women with breast cancer which have been already examined with IHC technique have been analyzed using FISH technique to determine HER2+ overexpression. Data were analyzed using GraphPad (Anova ver8) software. P