1. بررسی مقایسه ای ریزنشت فیشورسیلانت های ادهزیو با کامپوزیتهای فلو و رزین مدیفاید گلاس آینومر در فیشور سیلانت تراپی دندانهای دائمی.
- Author
-
شیوا کاوسی نژاد, محدثه شکری پور, بهاره عسگرتوران, and زهرا چراغی
- Subjects
- *
DENTAL resins , *IN vitro studies , *DATA analysis , *PIT & fissure sealants (Dentistry) , *STATISTICAL sampling , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *CHI-squared test , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *COMMERCIAL product evaluation , *ADHESIVES , *ANALYSIS of variance , *STATISTICS , *MICROSCOPY , *DENTAL glass ionomer cements - Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the microleakage of an adhesive fissure sealant (AFS), a flowable composite resin (FC), and a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) in permanent teeth. Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 45 extracted posterior teeth with sound fissures. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=15). The occlusal fissures were sealed with Beautisealant AFS without etching and bonding in group 1, with Beautifil FC after 37% phosphoric acid etching in group 2, and with Fuji II LC RMGI in group 3. The teeth underwent 500 thermal cycles (5-55°C), and their apices were sealed with wax. They were then immersed in 2% methylene blue for 24 hours. Next, the teeth were sectioned buccolingually and inspected under a stereomicroscope to measure the dye penetration depth as an indicator of microleakage. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, Chi-square test, and Scheffe test (alpha=0.05). The study was approved by the ethics committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (IR.UMSHA.REC.1399.728). Results: The microleakage score of RMGI was significantly higher than that of AFS and FC (P<0.05), while the microleakage scores of FC and AFS were not significantly different (P=0.330). Conclusions: The AFS showed a sealing ability comparable to that of FC, and can be used as an alternative to FC due to its fewer application steps. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF