Search

Purpose The study aimed to examine whether prophylactic surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) with less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) by tracheal catheterization in a group of spontaneously breathing preterm infants would improve clinical outcomes compared to prophylactic SRT with the INtubation-SURfactantExtubation (INSURE) method. Methods We compared 20 spontaneously breathing preterm infants, 25 to 29 weeks of gestation or with a birth weight of less than 1,250 g, treated with prophylactic SRT using a gastric tube (LISA group), to the 20 spontaneously breathing preterm infants matched by gestational age and birth weight, managed with prophylactic SRT via the INSURE method (INSURE group, historical control). Results The LISA group had lower rates of mechanical ventilation (MV) 72 hours after birth (P=0.019) and at any time (P=0.025), lower frequency of bradycardia during SRT (P=0.031), and lower median duration of MV than the INSURE group (P=0.038). In multivariate analysis, the LISA method was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of receiving invasive ventilation during hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.029; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.001 to 0.938; P=0.046) and a decreased frequency of bradycardia during SRT (OR, 0.020; 95% CI, 0.001 to 0.535; P=0.020) as compared to the INSURE method. Conclusion Prophylactic SRT using LISA via tracheal catheterization in preterm infants may significantly reduce exposure to MV during hospitalization and bradycardia during surfactant administration.

Purpose We compared perinatal characteristics, clinical outcomes, and treatment between late preterm infants born at 34 weeks and 35 to 36 weeks of gestation. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 254 neonates (gestational age 34+0 to +6 weeks) who were born at Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital between July 1, 2013 and June 31, 2018. Late preterm infants were categorized into two groups: Group 1 (born at 34 weeks, n=88) and Group 2 (born at 35 to 36 weeks, n=162). We compared the clinical outcomes, treatment, and readmission within 12 months after birth between two groups. Results Group 1 showed higher frequencies of antenatal steroid administration, premature membrane rupture, maternal antibiotic use, and histologic chorioamnionitis. Group 1 also had significantly more medical problems such as respiratory distress, feed ing intolerance, gavage feeding, neonatal jaundice, apnea or bradycardia, and hypocalcemia. Treatment during hospital stay including respiratory support, nutritional sup port, and antibiotics use over 24 hours was also significantly higher in Group 1. In addition, delayed discharge was more frequent in Group 1. Conclusion Late preterm infants born at 34 weeks gestation had significantly higher morbidity, required more aggressive management, and more often had delayed discharge compared to those in late preterm infants born at 35 to 36 weeks’ gestation.

Background Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors are frequently prescribed for patients with type 2 diabetes; however, their cost can pose a significant barrier for those with impaired kidney function. This study aimed to estimate the economic benefits of substituting non-renal dose-adjusted (NRDA) DPP4 inhibitors with renal dose-adjusted (RDA) DPP4 inhibitors in patients with both impaired kidney function and type 2 diabetes. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018, using data obtained from common data models of five medical centers in Korea. Model 1 applied the prescription pattern of participants with preserved kidney function to those with impaired kidney function. In contrast, model 2 replaced all NRDA DPP4 inhibitors with RDA DPP4 inhibitors, adjusting the doses of RDA DPP4 inhibitors based on individual kidney function. The primary outcome was the cost difference between the two models. Results In total, 67,964,996 prescription records were analyzed. NRDA DPP4 inhibitors were more frequently prescribed to patients with impaired kidney function than in those with preserved kidney function (25.7%, 51.3%, 64.3%, and 71.6% in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates [eGFRs] of ≥60,