Search

We retrospectively investigated the long-term effects of isopropyl unoprostone monotherapy on intraocular pressure and visual field for normal-tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Among 80 eyes of 49 subjects receiving isopropyl unoprostone monotherapy for 2 years or more, 32 eyes of 32 subjects were analyzed because of the good reliability of their visual acuity and visual field (age, 68.1 +/- 10.1 yrs, follow-up period 47.8 +/- 14.7 months). The mean values of intraocular pressure and visual field indices were compared with baseline data before medication. The visual field changes were also analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier life-table method. The mean intraocular pressure decreased for 4 years from 14.7 +/- 4.3 mmHg (mean +/- SD) at baseline, to 12.7 +/- 4.4mmHg at 4 years. The global index of visual field (mean defect, loss variance) did not change significantly during the 4 years. The accumulative probability of survival was 80.7 +/- 8.0% after 4 years when the endpoint was defined as 3dB progression in mean defect. Isopropyl unoprostone might have the possibility of stabilizing the visual field for a long period of time.

Purpose: To evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of treatment combining topical beta-blockers and isopropyl unoprostone in primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma patients., Methods: A prospective, open-label, parallel-group clinical comparison trial was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety of treatment combining 0.5% betaxolol and 0.12% isopropyl unoprostone (B&U) or 0.5% timolol and 0.12% isopropyl unoprostone (T&U). Forty eyes of 40 patients, which were matched in the aging and the stage of glaucomatous visual field defect, were studied. Twenty patients were treated with B&U and the other twenty patients with T&U twice daily for 24 months. Goldmann intraocular pressure(IOP), Humphrey automated perimetry, blood pressure, heart rate, and peak flow were done every six months in each group., Results: In the B&U treatment group, mean IOP was 21.2 mmHg at baseline and 18.3 mmHg(p < 0.005) after 2 years, and in the T&U treatment group it was 21.1 mmHg at baseline and 17.9 mmHg (p < 0.001) after 2 years. The cases in which MD value decreased over 2 dB were one in the B&U treatment group and three in the T&U treatment group. The average MD value was significantly improved from -7.40 dB to -5.90 dB after 2 years with B&U treatment(p < 0.05), but there was no difference with the T&U treatment. None of the patients stopped combined therapy because of side effects, though heart rate was significantly reduced only in T&U treatment group., Conclusion: Both combined treatments were effective for IOP reduction in glaucoma patients, and the data from the B&U treatment group suggested that B&U was more effective in maintaining visual field than T&U.

The effects of carteolol hydrochloride on visual function in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) were investigated. 22eyes of NTG patients were divided into two groups, i.e., (1) a group receiving topical application of 2% carteolol hydrochloride b.i.d. and 2 an unmedicated group. During a 18 month period, intraocular pressure and visual field (measured by Humphrey automated perimetry) were measured every 3 months, and the measurements obtained in the two groups were compared. Analysis of the results revealed a considerable reduction in intraocular pressure in the carteolol group as compared with the control group. The progression of mean deviation tended to be less in the carteolol group, but the intergroup difference in this respect was not statistically significant. However, increase in corrected pattern standard deviation was clearly less pronounced in the carteolol group than in the control group. These results supported the conclusion that carteolol is effective in inhibiting deterioration of the local visual field. This is attributed to increased ocular perfusion due to diminished intraocular pressure, as well as an inhibitory effect upon vasoconstriction in the optic nerve head due to intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, preventing decrease in papillary blood flow and adverse effects upon ocular circulation.

We found bilateral optic atrophy and visual field defects (paracentral scotoma and blind spot enlargement) in a worker who had been engaged in lead refining work in a lead refinery factory for 30 years. The worker is a 53-year-old Japanese male with no specific family and past histories. He complained of headache and vertigo after getting up in the morning for the past several years. He had several examinations in departments of psychiatry, otorhinopharyngolaryngology, neurosurgery and ophthalmology. Abnormal findings were not obtained by neurological examinations, electroencephalography, CT scanning for the head, Doppler test for jugular, vertebral and ophthalmic arteries, and equilibrium function (nystagmus) tests, except for labyrinthine deafness. Though the environmental conditions in this factory had been much improved recently, considerable high concentrations of lead were found till around 1965. Considering the results of hematological examinations for the past 30 years, it is clear that he had been affected by lead. We suspect that the causative relationship exists between lead exposure and optic atrophy and visual field defects.