Search

The purpose of this study was to introduce the electroconduction system for an implantable tinnitus suppressor. This system is a modification of the extracochlear implant system, which was developed at Hokkaido University. This system consists of a stimulator and two coils. One of the coils is implanted inside the temporal bone and its size, including the current limiter, is 9 mm long, 6.4 mm wide and 6 mm thick. Another is contained in the plastic case which is used for hearing aids. The efficacy of conduction depends on the wave frequency. The most effective frequency was about 30 kHz. The maximum current required to relieve tinnitus is 100 microA when using this system. The heat emitted from the coil inside the case is so minimal at an intensity of 100 microA as to be negligible systemically. The electromagnetic coupling system works well for more than 4 months in saline.

An electrical tinnitus suppressor, which was developed at Hokkaido University, was implanted in a female tinnitus patient. She had suffered from bilateral chronic otitis media and her bilateral hearing was seriously impaired. The electrical tinnitus suppressor consists of a stimulator, a coil inside the plastic hearing aid case and an implanted coil in the mastoid. The auditory nerve is stimulated at home twice. Using the system, her hearing ability and emotion improved in addition to tinnitus suppression. Her hearing level and tinnitus also improved in the ear contralateral to the stimulated side.

Our previous reports showed that second formant information, using a speech coding method, could be transmitted through an electrode on the promontory. However, second formant information can also be transmitted by tactile stimulation. Therefore, to find out whether electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve would be superior to tactile stimulation for our speech coding method, the time resolutions of the two modes of stimulation were compared. The results showed that the time resolution of electrical promontory stimulation was three times better than the time resolution of tactile stimulation of the finger. This indicates that electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve is much better for our speech coding method than tactile stimulation of the finger.