Search

A 86-year-old woman with left hemiparesis was admitted to our hospital. When visiting to our hospital, hemichorea appeared on her left extremities in an ambulance. She also had mild disturbance of consciousness, spatial disorientation, and sensory disturbance. Blood biochemical studies revealed mild renal failure. DWI MRI showed hyperintensities in the postcentral gyrus and a posterior part of the insula in the right hemisphere, but no signal changes in FLAIR. No lesions were detected in the basal ganglia. The DWI-FLAIR mismatch suggested acute cerebral infarction, and we performed intravenous thrombolysis therapy. Her neurological symptoms including hemichorea gradually improved, and she was finally discharged on foot. Two conspicuous points of the present patient are the sensory cortical infarction and an association with renal failure. In this patient, the sensory cortical infarction must produce chorea even though sensory cortical lesions rarely caused chorea. The associated renal dysfunction may play some role in the production of chorea. The double-crash of cerebral infarction and metabolic abnormality (renal dysfunction) may cause hemichorea which is rarely seen in patients with cerebral infarction of the sensory cortex and insula with no metabolic abnormalities.

Aim: As the number of aged stroke patients increases in Japan, the proportion of older patients who receive recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA, 0.6 mg/kg) is also rising. However, the Japanese stroke guideline indicates that rt-PA therapy must be administered very carefully in older patients (i.e. ≥81 years of age) because of serious complications after the therapy. We retrospectively assessed the clinical outcomes of rt-PA therapy in older patients., Methods: This study included 321 patients who received rt-PA therapy for acute cerebral infarction at our hospital between April 2007 and April 2017. The outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score at 3 months after treatment) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhaging (sICH) were compared and analyzed between patients ≥81 years of age (group A) and those <81 years of age (group B). In addition, propensity score matching was performed for the factors shown to have significant differences by a univariate analysis in order to adjust for confounding factors, and the outcomes were compared., Results: There were 58 patients in group A (18.1%) and 263 patients in group B (81.9%). The rate of favorable outcomes (mRS 0-1) was lower in group A (12.1%) than in group B (44.1%) (P<0.01). The mortality rate was higher in group A (17.2%) than in group B (4.6%) (P=0.002). No marked differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding the rate of sICH (group A, 3.4%; group B, 3.0%; P=1.00). After propensity score matching, the proportion of patients with favorable outcomes was significantly lower in group A (13.2%) than in group B (36.8%) (P=0.032). There were no marked differences in the mortality rates between the groups (group A, 17.2%; group B, 4.6%) (P=0.200), and no patients in either group had sICH., Conclusion: No marked differences in the incidence of ICH were observed between the older and younger groups receiving intravenous rt-PA therapy. However, in terms of efficacy, the proportion of patients with favorable outcomes was significantly lower in the older group than in the younger group.