Search

Background: the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the population has amplified the effects of health inequalities, particularly in the most vulnerable groups such as immigrants and refugees. An assessment of the intervention to contain the COVID-19 in these population groups was essential to define new strategies for more equitable, inclusive, and effective health policies to on health., Objectives: to provide a systematic synopsis of the impact of interventions to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in immigrants., Methods: data sources included major bibliographic databases. Using a study protocol, already shared with the international scientific community, two independent researchers reviewed the citations, selected and evaluated the interventions studies. Due to the heterogeneity of the interventions, a narrative synthesis was carried out., Results: three eligible studies were identified. The first study modelled the incidence of the disease in a refugee camp in Greece, based on an intervention of sectorialization of people that accessed to services, the use of masks, the early identification and isolation of cases and their family members, and the limitation of movements within the camp. The second evaluated the impact of preventive pharmacological interventions such as the use of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, povidone-iodine, zinc, and vitamin C, in different dosages and combinations, to a group of immigrant workers in a city dormitory in Singapore. The third study evaluated an intervention to increase vaccination coverage within a Latino immigrant community in the United States, moving the location of vaccine supply throughout the most frequented contexts by the immigrant community to access the city services. The results of the first and second studies suggest impacts for some of the proposed interventions even if they have been partially overcome due to the use of mass vaccination. The third showed a reduction in vaccine hesitancy and an increase in vaccination uptake and a snowball effect., Conclusions: the systematic review identified few heterogeneous studies, preventing any generalization of the results. Probably, the low scientific production does not reflect the successful experiences implemented. In the case of a possible resumption of the epidemic or new emergencies, it will be necessary to rely on indirect evidence and the scientific community should consider more the responsibility to evaluate and make available the experiences gained in the field. A constant monitoring activity of the evidence that will be necessary to updating the results for suggest consolidated prevention measures to for controlling the incidence of COVID-19 in immigrants during a possible resumption of the epidemic and for application in other similarly emergency contexts.

Objectives: to describe indicators, data sources, and levels of geographical stratification used within the framework of the CCM project "Epidemiological Surveillance and Control of COVID-19 in Metropolitan Urban Areas and for the containment of SARS-CoV-2 circulation in the immigrant population in Italy"., Design: population-based observational study based on data from the Integrated Covid-19 Surveillance System and the archive of hospital discharge records., Setting and Participants: interregional collaborative project. Resident population in 5 Italian Regions (Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, and Sicily)., Main Outcomes Measures: crude and age-standardized rates of diagnostic test utilization and positivity, hospitalization (in any department and in intensive care unit), and mortality in COVID-19 cases., Results: starting from the set of 11 indicators from the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP) project "Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19) and Use of Health Services in the Immigrant Population and Vulnerable Population Groups in Italy", the five most effective indicators for CCM purposes were identified. The INMP project highlighted higher rates of test access and positivity among Italians compared to foreigners, higher standardized hospitalization rates among foreigners, and higher standardized mortality rates among Italians, with geographical and temporal heterogeneity. The intersection between the DEGURBA (degree of urbanisation) classification and altimetric zones defined five levels of territorial stratification characterized by decreasing population density. Approximately 81% of the population involved in the CCM project resided in the first two levels; 43% of Italians lived in areas with intermediate population density in hilly or plain areas, while 48% of foreigners were concentrated in densely populated areas., Conclusions: sharing the collaborative approach and a research methodology already tested, integrated with the analysis of disaggregated indicators by morphological, functional, and administrative characteristics of the residential territory, allowed for assessing differences in the impact of the pandemic between Italians and foreigners residing in more or less densely populated areas.

Introduction Falls are the second leading cause of accidental or unintentional death worldwide. In hospital falls represent a relevant health problem, in particular after their increasing since Covid year 2020. The aim of this study is to evaluate correlation between falls and Covid infection., Methods: Risk Management Unit at Mauriziano hospital analyzed in the present observational study possible correlation with Covid Pandemic and falls risk factors, through comparison of patients falls occurred during year 2021 in Covid and no-Covid wards. The primary outcome of the study is the evaluation of relationship between falls and Covid infection. The secondary outcome is identification of falls risk factors., Results: No direct correlation between falls and Covid-19 infection was found. Among falls risk factors, the most interesting emerged is the fall itself that enhances the risk of relapse., Discussion: Increasing in patients falls since 2020 could be affected indirectly by strong hospital organization modifications during Covid pandemic.

Background: the study of the possible determinants of the rise and fall of infections can be of great relevance, as was experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic. One of the methods to understand whether determinants are simultaneous or develop through contiguity between different areas is the study of the diagnostic replication index RDt among regions., Objectives: to introduce the analysis of RDt variability and the subsequent application of a recently introduced functional clustering method as highly useful procedures for recognizing the presence of clusters with similar trends in epidemic curves., Design: within the considered period, trends in regional RDt are analyzed in detail over four different time intervals., Setting and Participants: to exemplify this methodology, the study of variability in the period from the end of 2021 to the beginning of 2022 may be of interest., Main Outcomes Measures: the variability in the regional RDt indices is assessed by means of the correlation coefficient weighted with respect to the populations of the individual regions. The clustering procedure is applied to the time series of absolute RDt values., Results: it emerges that the periods of increasing variability in the RDt correspond to the initial growth or decrease in the number of infections, while functional clustering identifies macro-areas in which the epidemic curves have had similar trends. What caused contagions to increase seems to relate to a factor that is not specific to certain areas, with the contribution in some cases of a contagion dynamic between adjacent areas., Conclusions: the variability in the trend of regional diagnostic replication indices, which are calculated with only a few days delay, is a further indicator for the early detection of major changes in the trend of epidemic curves. The clustering of epidemic index curves may be useful to determine whether determinants act simultaneously or by contiguity between adjacent areas.

Within the prevention programmes of the Italian Ministry of Health, a project aimed to containing the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the immigrant population in Italy has entrusted to the Regional Health Authority of Sicily Region (Southern Italy). New evidence has been promoted to disseminate and share public health intervention models. The project involved public health institutions across the national territory and was carried out during the COVID-19pandemic. The project reached the general aim through specific objectives, identifying information sources and health indicators, evaluating the impact of COVID-19, and promoting intervention programmes for taking charge immigrant population. Social distancing, although necessary, has further amplified the gap of inequalities in health, confirming major vulnerability for infection. Having filled some knowledge gaps and proposed prevention tools has been useful for the containment of the virus, for a possible resurgence of the phenomenon, for application in other emergency contexts, and for recalibration in new epidemic events.

The COVID-19 pandemic has modified the burden of disease in the population in various ways, depending on different social and economic conditions. Consequently, the pandemic has amplified health disparities, especially among the frail populations. During the pandemic, the incidence among immigrants showed a one- or two-week delay compared to natives, possibly due to delays in diagnosis and access to treatment. Health Authorities had to think new intervention strategies. As part of a project to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2 among immigrants in Italy, training emerged as a strategic intervention objective. The training included project areas that assessed the impact of the pandemic and public health intervention on immigrants and incorporated best practices from local experiences. The training was addressed to healthcare and social workers and aimed at building institutional networks and skills in caring for vulnerable people. Additionally, the training course was designed to be adaptable and applicable in other emergency contexts.

Background: the COVID-19 pandemic had important effects on people's health and socioeconomic conditions. Health surveillance systems fail to provide an adequate epidemiological profile of the pandemic in the recently immigrated population. In Piedmont and Emilia-Romagna Region (Northern Italy), a study was conducted in the public and private structures dedicated to the reception of migrants,Objectives: to evaluate the impact of the epidemic on the migrant population assisted in local reception centres., Design: quantitative analysis based on data collected in reception centres; qualitative analysis which, through 10 focus groups and 35 interviews with operators and migrants, investigated the consequences of the pandemic, their mechanisms, and their explanations., Setting and Participants: users and operators of reception services for migrants in the cities of Turin (Piedmont) and Bologna (Emilia-Romagna)., Main Outcomes Measures: quantitative analysis: access to services, prevalence of diseases, prevalence of test positivity; qualitative analysis: spread of the virus, organization of services, perceived critical issues and needs, solutions adopted, information received, perceived impact on health, perceived impact on social determinants., Results: a varied picture emerges. The few data available do not show a greater incidence and severity of the virus compared to the Italian population, despite strong elements of risk linked to precarious living and working conditions being reported. Reception services have implemented more flexible organizational methods, with effective prevention measures. The interruption of care pathways has led to the flare-up of previous pathologies, but getting in touch with services for the pandemic control has also allowed diagnosis and management of unknown diseases. Uncertainty, fear, social withdrawal, and crisis of the migratory project have increased mental disorders., Conclusions: in this scenario, close collaboration between public and third sector structures has proved fundamental and must be strengthened to overcome access barriers and make services more inclusive and equitable. It is also necessary to develop information systems capable of monitoring the health needs of this 'invisible' population.

Long COVID is a clinical syndrome characterized by the persistence or development of symptoms due to COVID-19 at least 12 weeks after initial infection. More than 200 different symptoms have been ascribed to long COVID, the most common being fatigue, shortness of breath, and muscle weakness. Women have a three-fold higher risk of being diagnosed with long COVID, and the symptoms more often described are persistent weakness, chest pain, altered smell and taste, palpitations or muscle pain, as well as neurological, gastrointestinal and rheumatologic symptoms. Long COVID features are influenced by immune function, endothelial dysfunction and sex hormones. Moreover, it leads to systemic dysfunction, so various therapeutic strategies have been explored and still different trials are ongoing, mainly regarding anticoagulation and immuno-modulators. Nowadays the most quoted interventions are focused rehabilitation programs and pharmacological selected treatments in specifical cases. The aim of this review will be focusing the clinical and pathophysiological sex-related peculiarities to understand the different long COVID phenotypes and possibly address a better tailored approach and treatment.

The present work describes the cumulative coverage curves by country of birth, sex, age, and area of residence of the adult population residing in the province of Reggio Emilia (Emilia-Romagna Region, Northern Italy).The analyses are stratified by country of birth into HDC (Highly Developed Country), mostly Italians, and HMPC (Highly Migration Pressure Country), as a proxy of migrant status, excluding deaths. Vaccinations carried out up to September 2022 and recorded in the information system were considered, including vaccinations performed outside the province. Vaccinations done abroad are not included when the information is incomplete or the type of vaccine is different from those administered in Italy.Vaccination coverage (%) by number of doses and estimated Hazard Ratio (HR) and related 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) are calculated using Cox models, adjusted for age and stratified by sex.A lower vaccination coverage was detected, delayed by a few weeks, among HMPC, but the differences in vaccination coverage are reversed when the different age structure of the two populations is taken into account. From the estimates of the Cox models, a higher propensity to vaccinate was noted among immigrants, in particular among women (women HR: 1.65; CI95% 1.52-1.78; men HR: 1.39; CI95% 1.28-1.52). Women were vaccinated first, but, at the end of the observation period, there were no particular differences in coverage between the two sexes, either among Italians or immigrants. Focusing on the area of origin, a strong propensity for vaccination was noted, particularly among who came from North Africa. In the mountain areas of the province, a lower propensity for vaccination was observed, perhaps explained by the greater distance of the vaccination centers or by a lower acceptability of the vaccine.

Viral infections are one of the most common triggers of Systemic Lupus Nephritis (SLE) flare-ups. COVID-19 pneumonia can be severe in patients affected by SLE representing a risk factor for lupus nephritis flare. We report the case of a 28-year-old woman with a history of lupus nephritis (LN), who relapsed with severe nephritic-nephritic syndrome after the resolution of COVID-19 pneumonia. In addition, we conducted a literature review to analyze all described cases of LN, vaccinated and unvaccinated, in COVID-19 showing that the course of COVID-19 is more severe in SLE patients with renal involvement, especially in those who have not been vaccinated. Vaccination is the most important measure for preventing COVID-19 in people with rheumatic diseases such as SLE. The case and data we present suggests that LN relapses can occur even after the infection has resolved and illustrates the benefit of vaccination, the role of modulation of immunosuppression during COVID-19 and the specific risk of disease relapse during SARS-CoV-2 infection., (Copyright by Società Italiana di Nefrologia SIN, Rome,Italy.)

Following the Covid-19 pandemic, a new disease has emerged: Long Covid syndrome, about which we know little and on which too little research is being done. It is a chronic disease, which is diagnosed when Covid symptoms last more than 12 weeks. To date, there is no pharmacological or other approach to Long Covid. The main symptoms of Long Covid are pain similar to those of rheumatic and autoimmune diseases, headaches, concentration and memory disorders, sometimes also perceived as brain fog and fatigue. Research and education and sensible, bipartisan social policy, away from all ideologies, are needed to address this additional aspect of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

The recent discussions on the efficacy and on the alleged harms caused by Covid-19 vaccines remind us of what happened 20 years ago with the Di Bella therapy, and always with alternative therapies, re-proposing a dilemma which, with the diffusion of communications though various media, is becoming increasingly topical: who is in the position to express opinions on technical topics in the health sector, worthy of being taken into consideration? The answer seems obvious: "the experts". But who decides who the experts are, and how do you recognize them? As paradoxical as it may seem, the only practicable system is to entrust the identification of experts to the experts themselves, the only ones able to recognize who can provide reliable answers on a specific problem. It is a system with huge flaws, but which in medicine has the advantage of forcing its interpreters to deal with the consequences of their choices, thus introducing a virtuous feedback mechanism with positive effects both on the selection of experts and on the decision-making mechanisms: it is therefore a system that seems to work in the medium-long term, but which in the face of an acute crisis is of little help to those who are not experts, but need the opinion of an expert.

Primary care management of Covid-19 pneumonia in the Province of Modena in the early phases of the pandemic: data integration from MAGMA study. Retrospective study on patients affected of Covid-19 and followed by General Practitioner from March 2020 to April 2021. 5340 patients were studied, 27% of them developed pneumoniae. Among these, most of them were managed entirely at home with an elevated intensity of care. Daily remote monitoring and home visits, together with a personalized pharmacological treatment, especially for the most severe forms, appeared to be the most effective interventions in reducing hospitalizations.

Introduction: the rapidity with which the Coronavirus epidemic emergency exploded took the scientific community by surprise, unprepared for such an event. The objective of this work is to evaluate, to date, the state of the art of the clinical trials approved by Aifa, analyzing the characteristics of the single completed and published trials and the authorization status for the use of the drugs under study in the treatment of Covid-19., Materials and Methods: The protocols available for each clinical study were extrapolated from the Aifa website relating to the management of clinical trials in Italy during the Covid-19 emergency; the unique EudraCT and Nct codes were extrapolated from these, verifying their publication using the PubMed search engine, the ClinicalTrials.gov platform, the EU Clinical Trials Register portal and the website of the pharmaceutical company identified as the promoter of the study. The characteristics of the individual trials useful for the analysis were extracted from the published papers. Finally, a comparison was made between the studies relating to experimental drugs which were subsequently authorized for the Covid-19 indication and the studies relating to drugs which have not yet been authorized to date., Results: In total, Aifa approved 94 between March 2020 and March 2022; of these, 22 are not listed on ClinicalTrials.gov; of the 72 trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, 31 (43%) were published, for a total of 25 drugs. Of the authorized and published trials, 26 report the "mortality endpoint". The most studied drugs are remdesivir and tocilizumab with 3 studies each, methylprednisone and molnupravir with 2. 14 studies are phase III, of these 12 used a drug as an experimental treatment which was then approved for Covid-19. Of the 41 trials present on ClinicalTrials.gov that have not yet been published, 21 are terminated. The drugs anakinra, remdesivir, molnupravir, regdanvimab, tocilizumab, AZD1222 vaccine have been updated/registered for Covid-19 indication; anakinra, baricitinib, tocilizumab and sarilumab have been included in the list of Law 648/96; remdesivir, canakinumab and ruxolitinib have been entered into compassionate use programmes., Discussion and Conclusions: The methods of early access to therapy have allowed an alternative to patients who are not eligible for the ongoing trials. The challenge that the scientific community has faced has strengthened the culture of evidence-based medicine.

Introduction: The ongoing pandemic has not only placed significant strain on healthcare systems and global economies but has also exacerbated psychiatric issues, undermining the mental well-being of countless individuals. It is widely recognized that epidemic events, particularly periods of lockdown, heighten the risk of developing anxiety disorders, depression, and aggressive behaviors., Materials and Methods: In an Italian cohort, a retrospective study was conducted to examine the consumption and costs of antipsychotic medications during and after the Covid-19 pandemic, specifically in the years 2020-2022. Utilizing a database known as the "Sistema Tessere Sanitaria", data on medication dispensations from publicly accessible community pharmacies were extracted, covering a population of approximately one million individuals., Results: The findings for the years 2020-2021 showed relatively stable patterns, with overall consumption and expenditure slightly decreasing from 2020 to 2021. However, it is worth noting that the antipsychotic drug aripiprazole exhibited an opposite trend, with an increase in consumption. Despite expectations of heightened antipsychotic medication use, real-world evidence indicates a different phenomenon, suggesting that the pandemic might not have significantly influenced the consumption of these medications., Conclusions: The limited accessibility to healthcare and medical appointments likely played a role in this observation, potentially masking the therapeutic needs of the population. It will be crucial to monitor the situation in the upcoming years, as normal clinical activities resume, to determine whether there will be an upsurge in the consumption of antipsychotic drugs, which represent a significant portion of the National Healthcare System's expenditure.

Objectives: to describe Open Data Covid, an online application dedicated to the pandemic and the health of the population of the province of L'Aquila (Abruzzo Region, Southern Italy), created following the health emergency in Italy and worldwide., Design: Open Data Covid is the result of a multidisciplinary study group including University of L'Aquila, Local Health Unit 1 Abruzzo, and Gran Sasso Science Institute. In the first phase, the information to be shown was identified and made available based on the pandemic national reports to obtain comparable results. The health databases containing the information needed to power the application were selected. This information was then evaluated, cleaned, and integrated., Setting and Participants: data derived from administrative data flow of the Local Health Unit., Main Outcomes Measures: the final application collects individual data from confirmed laboratory cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and collects information about their residence, laboratory diagnosis, hospitalization, clinical status, risk factors and outcome., Results: the application was structured in three sections. The first section shows data about the COVID-19 pandemic; the second contains information about the assisted population; the third contains documentation and access to public Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) for accessing source data. Consulting the application data is simple and intuitive: through graphs and infographics, the temporal and geographical course of the pandemic can be known., Conclusions: the Open Data Covid application is a response to the information gaps highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Its creation demonstrated that is possible to build an online application useful both for the population and for public health professionals.

Recent evidence shows that a range of persistent or new symptoms can manifest after 4-12 weeks in a subset of patients who have recovered from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, and this condition has been coined long COVID by COVID-19 survivors among social support groups. Long COVID can affect the whole spectrum of people with COVID-19, from those with very mild acute disease to the most severe forms. Like the acute form, long COVID has multisystemic aspects. Patients can manifest with a very heterogeneous multitude of symptoms, including fatigue, post-exertional malaise, dyspnea, cognitive impairment, sleep disturbances, anxiety and depression, muscle pain, brain fog, anosmia/dysgeusia, headache, and limitation of functional capacity, which impact their quality of life. Because of the extreme clinical heterogeneity, and also due to the lack of a shared, specific definition, it is very difficult to know the real prevalence and incidence of this condition. Risk factors for developing long COVID would be female sex, initial severity, and comorbidities. Globally, with the re-emergence of new waves, the population of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 continues to expand rapidly, necessitating a more thorough understanding of potential sequelae of COVID-19. This review summarizes up to date definitions and epidemiological aspects of long COVID.

The intake of Vitamin D against COVID-19 has theoretical bases. In the 3-year period of the pandemic, hundreds of favorable observational studies and some small randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been produced.However, to date, RCTs of larger size and quality have unfavorable results and do not support its use, neither in oral form at various doses nor as injection boluses nor in prophylaxis nor in treatment of COVID-19, not even in severe or critical cases, nor to prevent deaths.The results of a recent sequential meta-analysis of a few RCTs, presented as 'definitive evidence', are biased by the weight of the improper inclusion of an observational study.Interference with correct information, both in the media and in scientific communication, risks obscuring in clinical practice the conclusions of the most valid studies available.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, territorial services and general practitioners in particular played a central role in identifying suspected cases and contact tracing. Vulnerability criteria were defined to identify patients at risk of developing severe forms of infection, which were later used to direct patients towards appropriate mitigation measures and prioritize access to vaccinations. The identification of individuals at risk of severe Covid-19 remains crucial, especially for particularly vulnerable patients with oncohematological and cardiovascular conditions, who require specific preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Introduction: Epidemiology is increasingly involved on a wide variety of topics and to engage different professionals and disciplines in an increasingly active way. A fundamental role is played by young researchers active in Italian epidemiology who create opportunities for meeting and discussion, in the name of multidisciplinarity and integration of different skills., Objective: The aim of this paper is to provide a detailed description of the topics most frequently studied in epidemiology by young people and to highlight any changes in these topics in the pre- and post-Covid-19 workplaces., Methods: All abstracts submitted in the years 2019 and 2022 by young participants in the Maccacaro Prize, an annual award aimed at Italian association of epidemiology (Aie) conference addressed to people under 35 years of age, were considered. In addition to the comparison of the topics, a comparison of the related work structures and their geographical location was carried out by grouping the research centres into three Italian geographical regions: north, centre and south/islands., Results: Between 2019 and 2022, the number of abstracts participating in the Maccacaro Prize increased. The interest in topics related to infectious diseases, vaccines, and pharmaco-epidemiology has sharply increased, while in environmental and maternal and child epidemiology it has moderately increased. Social epidemiology, health promotion and prevention, as well as clinical and evaluative epidemiology, have experienced a decrease in interest. Finally, after analysing the geographical distribution of reference centres, it was discovered that certain regions, such as Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany and Latium, have a strong and consistent presence of young people in the field of epidemiology. Conversely, there is a small number of young professionals working in this field in other Italian regions, especially in Southern regions., Conclusions: The pandemic has changed our personal and working habits, but it has also played a fundamental role in making epidemiology known. The increase in young people joining an association such as the Aie is a clear sign of the growing interest in this discipline.

Vaccine-associated myocarditis and pericarditis usually develop within 14 days of COVID-19 vaccination, are exceptionally rare, manifest with mild clinical pictures and are commonly characterized by a favorable evolution. Young men inoculated with two doses of an mRNA vaccine are the subgroup at higher risk. Recent epidemiological studies evaluated the incidence and risk of vaccine-associated myocarditis and pericarditis among men and women, in different ranges of age and specific types of vaccines. Long-term population analyses demonstrated that the cardiovascular risk conferred by COVID-19 extends beyond the acute phase, representing the rationale for implementing prevention strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection, monitoring specific populations at higher risk and pursuing the completion of the vaccination campaign. This document provides an update on the most recent scientific evidence and critical interpretation of available data in constant evolution towards personalized strategies of immunization.

Background: currently, individuals at risk of adverse outcomes for COVID-19 can access to vaccination and pharmacological interventions. But, during the first epidemic wave, there were no treatments or therapeutic strategies available to reduce adverse outcomes in patients at risk., Objectives: to assess the impact of an intervention at 15-month follow-up developed by the Agency for Health Protection of the Metropolitan Area of Milan (ATS Milan) based on telephone triage and consultation by the General Practitioners (GPs) for patient with high-risk for adverse outcomes., Design: intervention on population., Setting and Participants: a total of 127,292 patients in the ATS aged ≥70 years and with comorbidities associated with an increased risk of dying from COVID-19 infection were identified. Using a specific information system, patients were assigned to their GPs for telephone triage and consultation. GPs inform them about the risks of the disease, non-pharmacological prevention measures, and precautions in contacts with family members and other persons. No specific clinical intervention was carried out, only an information/training intervention was performed., Main Outcome Measures: by the end of May 2020, 48.613 patients had been contacted and 78.679 had not been contacted. Hazard Ratios (HRs) of infection hospitalisation and death at 3 and 15 months were estimated using Cox regression models adjusted by confounder., Results: no differences in gender, age class distribution, prevalence of specific diseases, and Charlson Index were found between the two groups (treated such as called patients and not called). Called patients had a higher propensity for influenza and antipneumococcal vaccination and have more comorbidities and greater access to pharmacological therapies. Non-called patients have a greater risk for COVID-19 infection: HR was 3.88 (95%CI 3.48-4.33) at 3 months and 1.28 (95%CI 1.23-1.33) at 15 months; for COVID-19 hospitalization HR was 2.66 (95%CI 2.39-2,95) at 3 months and 1.31 (95%CI 1.25-1.37) at 15 months; for overall mortality HR was 2,52 (95%CI 2.35-2:72) at 3 months and 1.23 (95%CI 1.19-1.27) at 15 months., Conclusions: the results of this study show a reduction in hospitalization and deaths and support, in case of pandemic events, the implementation of new care strategies based on adapted stratification systems in order to protect the population's health. This study presents some limits: it is not randomized; a selection bias is present (called patients were those most in contact with the GPs); the intervention is indication-based (on march 2020, the actual benefit of protection and distancing for high-risk groups was unclear), and the adjustment is not able to fully control for confounding. However, this study points out the importance to develop information systems and improve methods to best protect the health of the population in setting of territorial epidemiology.

Objectives: to describe studies that evaluated the screening programmes implemented in the school during the COVID-19 pandemic., Design: a systematic literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 Guidelines. Studies published until December 2021 were included. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with validated scales. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were carried out by two authors independently., Setting and Participants: teachers and students belonging to schools of all levels, including universities., Main Outcomes Measures: a. transmission-related outcomes (such as the number or proportion of cases, cumulative frequency, incidence); b. feasibility/acceptability of the screening strategies; c. socioeconomic outcomes (such as testing cost, number of days spent in school, quarantine)., Results: after having removed duplicate articles, 2,822 records were retrieved. Thirty-six studies were included (15 used an observational design and 21 modelling study). Regarding the former, the methodological quality has been rated as high in 2 studies, intermediate in 6 and low in 2; in the remaining ones, it was not evaluated because only descriptive. Screenings were quite different in terms of school study population, types of tests used, methods of submission and analysis, and level of incidence in the community at the time of implementation. Outcome indicators were also varied, a heterogeneity that, on the one hand, did not allow for meta-analysis of results and, on the other, allowed for testing the performance of the screenings in very different settings. All of the field studies claim that the screenings reduced SARS-CoV-2 exposure and infection among children, adolescents, and college students, curbing at-school transmission and helping to reduce the number of closing school days. Studies that evaluated the cost of the intervention emphasized its cost-effectiveness, while those that focused on the acceptability of the instrument showed a preference among children, adolescents, and parents for minimally invasive, self-administered tests with high sensitivity and lower frequency of repetition. Simulation-based studies are mostly based on compartmental and agent-based models. Their quality is quite high methodologically, although uncertainty quantification and external validation, aimed at verifying the model ability to reproduce observed data, are lacking in many cases. The contexts to which the simulations refer are all school-based, although 7 studies consider residential situations, which are poorly suited to the Italian context. All simulation-based models indicate the importance of planning repeated testing on asymptomatic individuals to limit contagion. However, the costs of these procedures can be high unless assessments are spaced out or pool testing procedures are used. Obtaining high student adherence to the screening programme is extremely important to maximize results., Conclusions: school-based screenings, especially when combined with other preventive measures, have been important public health tools to contain infections during COVID-19 waves and to ensure children's and adolescents' right to education and to prevent the fallout in physical and mental health (with strong equity consequences) associated with school closures.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic was a whispered problem for nurses, causing feelings of anxiety, stress, and burnout. Many studies investigated the pandemic's negative effects on nurses, but the relationship between burnout and the quality of life (QoL) in Italian nurses was lacking., Aim: To describe Italian nurses quality of life and stress during the Covid-19 outbreak., Methods: METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study between March 25, 2020, to May 15, 2020. The MBI scale was used to detect burnout, while the SVQI was for nurses' quality of life (QoL). We used descriptive and correlational statistical tests between the scales and risk factors. The significance level was set at P. 0.05., Results: A total of 384 nurses were assessed, 58.1% (223) were female, 41.9% (161) were male. Depersonalization appeared in 85% of cases, emotional exhaustion in 52.3%, and personal accomplishment in 17.4%. Overall, nurses report a dissatisfaction with the physical, emotional and social QoL. The factors that contribute to onset of the syndrome was: gender (p = 0.003), ward (p = 0.03), care to COVID-19 patients (p = 0.02). Women are dissatisfied with physical (p = 0.001), emotional (p = 0.001) and social (p =0.002) QoL. Statistically significant differences by department (p = 0.01) and geographical area of Northern Italy (p = 0.02)., Conclusion: During the COVID-19 outbreak, some factors studied are associated with high-stress levels and low physical and social QoL. Women were the gender most affected by the effects of the pandemic.

Objectives: to describe the course of COVID-19 epidemic in the hospitals of the ASST of Mantua (Lombrady Region, Northern Italy) from February 2020 to April 2021., Design: observational study., Setting and Participants: data from hospital discharging chart of all patients admitted to the hospitals of ASST were collected from 26.02.2020 to 30.04.2021 with COVID-19 diagnosis. Data from Emergency Rooms for patients evaluated but not admitted to departments were also collected., Main Outcome Measures: the data from hospital discharging were crossed for diagnosis with data from laboratory. The department were classified into 'low intensity' and 'middle/high intensity'. The comparison was according to the different periods of epidemic., Results: patients admitted to the hospitals were 2,738: 510 died (17.3%) and 1,736 patients were evaluated in the Emergency Rooms but not admitted to departments. Among these patients, 166 died (9.6%). The prevailing age class were >=65 years, with a trend to reduction in the third wave. The proportion of admission in middle/high intensity departments was significantly higher in the second wave than in the first. N. 510 deaths by 2,738 (17.3%) were observed, with significant reduction in the second and third waves in the low intensity departments (from 21.9% to 14.3% and 12.7%) (p<0.001), while mortality was substantially unchanged in the middle/high intensity departments (28.0%, 29.6%, and 28.3%). The mortality for patients with >=65 years was 26.7%. Females showed lower mortality (OR 0.690; CI95% 0.560-0.840) and lower incidence of admissions in middle/high intensity departments (OR 0.556; CI95% 0.459-0.673) in the three waves. Finally, including also the patients not admitted, the general mortality was 15.1%., Conclusions: a worse outcome by mortality and severity of disease was observed for male gender compared to female and for older age classes. Moreover, a significant improvement of outcomes in the second and third waves, compared to the first, was pointed out.

. Measuring missed nursing care during the Covid-19 pandemic: methodological reflections. Missed care phenomenon has demonstrated an increasingly interest of the researchers over the years. Even during the pandemic period, many studies have been published with the aim of describing missed care during this healthcare emergency. The comparative studies (Covid-19 versus non-Covid-19) were innovative; however, no important differences have emerged. On the other hand, many studies have been published with a descriptive intent, also in this case without highlighting substantial differences as compared to the pre-pandemic period. These findings bring out a series of methodological reflections, which should be considered to advance research in this field.

With the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, Italy has embarked on a phase of health care reconstruction, which must be monitored in terms of quality and equity. Current evaluation systems, such as the National healthcare outcomes programme by Agenas, represent an important starting point, but they are still too centred on hospital care, due to a lack of national-level data on primary care. The development of new data analysis tools, in the context of European projects such as Oases (prOmoting evidence-bASed rEformS), and, above all, the next frontier of digital healthcare offer great potential for the evaluation and monitoring of healthcare processes.

Aim: The aim is to describe remote multifamily psychoeducational intervention led by REMS "Castore" team (an Italian health care facility for offenders who suffer from mental disorders and socially dangerous) in ASL Roma 5, a local health authority, during covid-19 emergency., Methods: The applied theoretical models have been the integrated psychoeducational intervention by I. Falloon and the multifamily psychoeducational intervention based on problem solving by F. Veltro. The multifamily psychoeducational intervention was attempted by inpatients' relatives from June to August 2020 with 8 weekly meetings of 90' each led by two psychiatric rehabilitation therapists and healthcare experts. Six families were involved in the study and its members were assessed by questionnaire on family problems, Brief-COPE and general health questionnaire tests. Users were assessed by Level of Expressed Emotion Scale test for their expressed emotion., Results: Data analysis highlighted the general low level of subjective and objective burden for family members in association with a high perception of that support provided by REMS. Furthermore, the study has shown those coping approaches oriented to the research of practical solutions, acceptance of events and assertive communication., Discussion: The low subjective and objective burden may be attributed to implicit security conditions in REMS and the absence of tasks mainly carried out by experts. Those coping styles oriented to more practical than emotional approaches suggest an emotional hyper control or stigma perception leading to isolation and loneliness., Conclusions: The multifamily psychoeducational intervention has allowed a trustworthy relationship with REMS. Considering that the families involved in the study have never benefited by other psychoeducational interventions before, their early involvement appears to be a potential tool for preventing and managing crisis as well as minimizing recidivism.

Long-covid is a typical condition of adults with a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the previous 3 months and with symptoms lasting over 2 months not explained by an alternative diagnosis. In pediatric age the lack of significative differences comparing the reported symptoms between seropositive and seronegative suggests that long-covid might be less common than previously thought, emphasizing the impact of pandemic-associated symptoms regarding the well-being and mental health of young adolescents. Many children-adolescents, who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection or not, have a health request to which we must respond with a professional approach aimed at a complex functional rehabilitation. The risk is that the "long-covid" becomes a "long-inattention" on relevant mental health problems.

Objectives The aim of this article is to answer the question of whether the lockdowns introduced in 2020 and 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic had an impact on intergenerational family ties in the area of social support in European societies. If so, was the impact positive or negative? Was it more concerned with the support provided to parents or children living separately? Material and methods The analysis used data from representative SHARE Corona Survey 1 and SHARE Corona Survey 2, conducted among respondents aged 50 and over, between June and August 2020 and between June and August 2021. Results The results of the analysis indicate that during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, the frequency of providing assistance in dealing with necessary matters to parents increased in almost all European countries, while assistance provided to children decreased. A similar situation occurred in the case of personal care. During the next spring lockdown in 2021, it was noticeable that there was a greater decrease in both care and frequency of support given to children than to parents. Conclusions The Covid-19 pandemic has undoubtedly had an impact on the frequency of social support provided. In the case of support provided to children, we see a negative impact. However, in the case of parental support, the situation was different. It should be remembered that the respondents are aged 50 and over, and therefore their parents are elderly people who often struggle with health problems and, in many cases, with dependency. This leads to the conclusion that in the case of people requiring support (elderly parents) in the form of assistance in dealing with necessary matters and personal care, the Covid-19 pandemic did not have a negative impact on the strength of intergenerational family ties.

Objectives Contacts of persons serving prison terms with their family, relatives and friends allow the fulfillment of specific needs, constituting one of the most important penitentiary activities. These contacts carried out on a daily basis during the Covid 19 pandemic were limited and, in fact, impossible for some time. Material and methods The aim of the study was to diagnose prisoners in terms of their contacts with family and other close people (forms, frequency, assessment) during the Covid-19 pandemic. The purpose of the study formulated in this way obliged us to implement the project in a normative paradigm (Rubacha, 2011, p. 311). The research was conducted using the diagnostic survey method (Babbie, 2001, p. 268) using a questionnaire. Results The research presented in the article is part of a research program relating to post-penitentiary assistance and social readaptation of people serving prison sentences. Conclusions Before the pandemic began, three out of four inmates used telephone contacts and approximately 2/3 of them used visits. Nearly half of the inmates pointed to the letters, and every fourth - to the Skype messenger. Let us add that before the pandemic, 11% of respondents did not use any forms of contact, 30% - used one of them (usually visits or telephone contact). 43% of all respondents used both telephone contacts and visits. The "other" answers included: "I didn't use it", "I wasn't imprisoned",

Objectives The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on all areas of human life has been great. The prevailing disease also turned out to be a challenge for managers and the entire educational environment, which is the genesis of this article. Therefore, the aim of this article is to compare interest in the issue of improving managerial competences in the period before and after the Covid-19 pandemic and to draw conclusions in this area. Material and methods The article contains a presentation of the results of research relating to the need to improve competences by the management staff of the organization before the pandemic (2018) and after its end (2022). The research covered middle-level managers and small business entrepreneurs. Results The obtained results prove that it is necessary to constantly adapt to new market conditions and requirements, and new competences are indispensable in order to do so. Respondents see the need to improve the level of their knowledge, opting for forms that will not absorb them excessively (e.g. self-improvement). The respondents emphasize the need to know international issues and law, and the main inspiration for improving competences is the changeability of the company's operating conditions and concern for its fate. The COVID-19 pandemic emphasizes that, especially in such circumstances, improving managerial competences is indispensable. Conclusions The obtained results undoubtedly show significant changes that have taken place in the way of performing professional functions, including managerial ones and shaping the competencies of managers, but also the complexity of the analyzed phenomenon and the problems articulated in this area. The analysis carried out and its results constitute an important guideline for management practice, mainly in relation to people holding managerial positions.

The generation of rapid information has been an important novelty in the COVID-19 pandemic and a challenge for epidemiology. The methodological frailty and uncertainty of rapid data use has been a consequence. We are talking about an 'intermezzo' epidemiology between the event and the production of consolidated data that opens up great opportunities to the use epidemiology for rapid public health decisions, provided a careful work to be done before emergencies. In Italy, an ad hoc national COVID-19 information system producing daily data that quickly became essential for public decision-making. Total and all-cause mortality data are derived from the traditional information system of the Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat), which, at the onset of the pandemic, was unable to provide rapid total and all-causes mortality data at the national level and still produces them with a one- to two-month delay. National cause and place mortality data referred to the first epidemic wave (March and April 2020) was in May 2021 and recently updated (October 2022) for the whole year 2020. Nearly three years after the onset of the epidemic, we have no nationwide rapid information on the distribution of deaths by place of death (hospitals, nursing homes and other care facilities, home) neither on their breakdown in 'by COVID-19', 'with COVID-19', and 'non-COVID-19' deaths. The pandemic being still in progress, new problems arise (the long-term impact of COVID-19, the impact of lockdown policies, etcetera), whose solution cannot be postponed until peer reviewed papers are available. A fine-tuning of the rapid processing of interim data certainly requires the development of national and regional information systems, but first of all a methodologically robust 'intermezzo' epidemiology.

Objectives: to analyze the difference of the SARS-CoV-2 infection impact between Italian and foreigner subjects, evaluating the trend of infections and access to diagnostic tests (molecular or antigenic swabs for the detection of SARS- CoV-2) in the two different populations, inducing the detection of new positive cases in the population., Design: retrospective population study for the period February 2020-June 2021., Setting and Participants: Italian and foreign resident population on 1st January of the years 2020 and 2021 in the Regions participating to the project: Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy), Tuscany, Lazio (Central Italy), and Sicily (Southern Italy)., Main Outcome Measures: in the two populations, for every week and aggregated by macropandemic period were calculated: • the test rate (people tested on the population); • the swab positivity rate (positive subjects on those who are tested); • the new positives (positive subjects on study population); • the percentage of foreigners among the new positive cases. The ratio of the value of the indicators in the foreign and Italian populations (with 95% confidence interval) was calculated to evaluate the association between nationality (Italian vs not Italian) and outcome. The analyses were conducted at the regional level and at pool level., Results: the trend of new positives by nationality (Italian vs not Italian) has a similar tendency in the different pandemic waves. However, the incidence of new positives during pandemic waves among foreigners is lower than in Italians, while it tends to increase during intermediate periods. Except for the summer periods, foreigners are less tested than Italians, but the percentage of new positives out of the total of new ones tested is higher among foreigners compared to Italians. The relative weight of new positives among foreigners tends to increase in periods with the greatest risk of inflow of SARS-CoV-2 for foreigners., Conclusions: the epidemic trends in the two populations are similar, although foreigners tend to show lower incidence values, probably in part because they are tested less frequently. Furthermore, in foreigners compared to Italians, there is a greater risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in periods of relaxation of containment Coronavirus measures, reopening of national borders, production and commercial activities.

Objectives: to quantify the variability of COVID-19 mortality from the beginning of the pandemic to mid-July 2021, in relation to the immigrant status and by Region and period., Design: observational incidence study., Setting and Participants: the study population consists of the residents at the beginning of 2020 in seven Regions (Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, Sicily) aged <=74 years., Main Outcome Measures: absolute frequency of deaths occurred in subjects who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, crude and standardized rates (standard: Italian population at the beginning of 2020), and mortality rates ratios (obtained using Poisson models), by immigrant status and stratified by gender, Region of residence, and period. The study period was divided into 5 subperiods: 22.02.2020-25.05.2020, 26.05.2020-02.10.2020, 03.10.2020-26.02.2021, 27.02.2021-16.07.2021., Results: the study includes more than one half of the Italian population and most of the immigrants residing in the country, who are younger than Italians and experienced fewer COVID-19 deaths. Deaths among those who tested positive varied greatly between Regions and periods; standardized rates showed considerable increases over time among immigrants. In terms of rate ratios, there were excesses among immigrant males in the third period (MRR: 1.46; 95%CI 1.30-1.65) and in the fourth period (MRR: 1.55; 95%CI 1, 34-1.81). Among immigrant females, there is an indication of lower risk in the third period (MRR: 0.79; 95%CI 0.65-0.97) and of greater risk in the fourth period (MRR: 1. 46; 95%CI 1.21-1.77). Finally, the effect is modified by the Region of residence, both in the third and in the fourth period for males and only in the fourth period for females., Conclusions: the risk of premature mortality due to COVID-19 is linked to immigrant status and with an intensity that varies by gender, Region, and period. More accessible tools for prevention, diagnosis and early healthcare can support immigrant communities in managing the risk factors linked to the spread of infections and, in particular, counteract their evolution into more severe disease outcomes.

Objectives: to describe trends of overall and intensive care hospitalization for COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic in Italy until June 2021, and to compare the results between foreign and Italian population., Design: retrospective observational study., Setting and Participants: hospital discharges of 28 million people living in Lombardy, Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy), Toscana and Lazio (Central Italy) occurred between 22.02.2020 and 02.07.2021 in the hospitals located in each considered Region., Main Outcome Measures: two weekly outcomes were examined: 1. the overall number of COVID-19 hospitalizations; 2. the number of COVID-19 hospitalizations in intensive care units., Results: a higher COVID-19 overall and intensive care unit hospitalization was found among the foreign population compared to Italians. The association emerged only after the adjustment for age, and it was consistent among all Regions, though less marked in Lombardy. The association varied across epidemic phases., Conclusions: the issue of vulnerability of migrants to the risk of severe COVID-19 calls for a diversity-sensitive approach in prevention. The specific country of origin and the prevalence of preventable co-morbidities that are often underestimated in the migrant populations, and related to COVID-19 complications, should be taken into consideration in future analyses.

Objectives: to examine the differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization rates among migrant populations in Veneto Region (Northern Italy), according to the geographic area of origin., Setting and Participants: all residents in Veneto Region aged <65 years were included in the analyses. All subjects infected by SARS-CoV-2 and hospitalized for COVID-19 were identified by means of the regional biosurveillance system., Main Outcome Measures: age- and gender-specific infection and hospitalization rates were stratified by geographic area of origin and were estimated using the number of incident cases over the resident population in Veneto on 01.01.2021. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) for infection and hospitalization rates were estimated using a Poisson model, adjusted for age and gender, among migrants compared to Italians., Results: compared to Italians, SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were significantly higher among migrants from Central and South America and Central and South Asia, lower among those from North Africa and High-Income Countries (HIC), and were approximately halved for those coming from Other Asian Countries (mainly represented by China). Hospitalization rates were significantly higher for all migrant populations when compared to Italians, with the exception of those coming from HIC. Neither age nor gender seemed to modify the association of the geographic area of origin with SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization rates. IRR for SARS-CoV-2 infection of migrants compared to Italians showed how migrants from Other Asian Countries had the lowest infection rates (-53%), followed by people from HIC (-25%), North Africa (-21%), and Eastern Europe (-10%). Higher infection rates were present for Central and South America and Central and South Asia (+17% and +10, respectively). Hospitalization rates were especially high among migrants from Central and South Asia, Africa, and Central and South America, ranging from 1.84 to 3.14 times those observed for Italians., Conclusions: a significant heterogeneity in SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization rates of migrant populations from different geographic areas of origin were observed. The significantly lower incidence rate ratio for infections, compared to that observed for hospitalizations, is suggestive of a possible under-diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection among migrant populations. Public health efforts should be targeted at increasing support among migrants to contrast the spread of the pandemic by potentiating vaccination campaigns, contact tracing, and COVID-19 diagnostic tests.

COVID-19, a deadly pandemic that has affected millions of people worldwide, is also associated with cardiovascular complications, such as venous and arterial thromboembolic events. The viral spike protein, in fact, may promote the release of prothrombotic and inflammatory mediators. Vaccines, coding for the spike protein, are the primary measure for preventing COVID-19. However, some unexpected thrombotic events at unusual sites, most frequently the cerebral venous and splanchnic districts, with associated thrombocytopenia, have emerged in subjects who received adenovirus-based vaccines, especially in fertile women. This clinical entity has been rapidly recognized as a new syndrome, named vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, probably caused by cross-reacting antiplatelet factor 4 antibodies activating platelets. This prompted the regulatory agencies of various countries to restrict the use of adenovirus-based vaccines to specific age groups. The prevailing opinion of most experts, however, is that the risk of developing COVID-19 disease, including thrombosis, clearly outweighs this potential extremely low risk.This paper aims at providing a comprehensive review of epidemiological issues, clinical data and pathogenetic hypotheses of thrombosis linked to both COVID-19 and its vaccines, helping cardiologists to offer an up-to-date and evidence-based counseling to their often-alarmed patients with acute or chronic coronary syndromes.

Abstract This paper explores the multifaceted impact of Covid-19 on Sesto San Giovanni, in the Milan metropolitan area. It analyzes the challenges faced by local businesses and how the city responded with extraordinary measures for public spaces, revitalizing commercial sectors, and adopting new coping mechanisms. The pandemic underscored the strategic importance of public spaces and commercial activities as vital infrastructures for societal well-being and resilience. Integrating outdoor amenities like dehors and parklets into urban redevelopment plans has boosted economic vitality and social cohesion, creating a vibrant and interconnected urban environment.