Search

Objectius: saber l'opinió del personal docent i investigador de Ciències de l'Activitat Física i de l'Esport sobre: a) els criteris i productes d'avaluació d'articles científics més ben valorats, i b) les revistes nacionals i internacionals més prestigioses. Han format la mostra cent seixanta-tres professors universitaris que impartien classes en el grau de Ciències de l'Activitat Física i de l'Esport en el curs 2013–2014, dels quals vint-i-quatre són avaluadors d'alguna agència d'avaluació i cent trenta-nou no formen part de cap agència d'avaluació. -- Metodologia: l'instrument que s'ha utilitzat ha estat l'apartat d'articles i revistes del Objectives: To learn the opinion of university lecturers and researchers of physical activity and sport sciences on the subject of: a) the best criteria and products for evaluating scientific articles; and b) the best national and international scientific journals. The study used a sample of 163 lecturers teaching the Bachelor’s Degree in Physical Activity and Sport Sciences during the academic year 2013–2014. Twenty-four of the lecturers were evaluators working for an evaluation agency and 139 did not work for any agency. -- Methodology: The instrument used was the article and journal section of the Cuestionario sobre criterios de calidad del personal docente e investigador universitario en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte (Questionnaire on the quality evaluation criteria employed by university lecturers and researchers of the Bachelor’s Degree in Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, CPDI-CAFD). -- Results: The criteria and evaluation products offered by Journal Citation Reports and Scopus were considered to be particularly important. The most highly valued Spanish journals were Apunts and Revista de Psicología del Deporte, while the most highly valued international publications were Journal of Sports Science and Sports Medicine. These results can be especially important for evaluating scientific publications. The applications for accreditations can be evaluated taking into account the classifications of specific sport science journals.

Objetivos: conocer la opinión del personal docente e investigador de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte sobre: a) criterios y productos de evaluación de artículos científicos mejor valorados, y b) las revistas nacionales e internacionales más prestigiosas. La muestra estuvo formada por ciento sesenta y tres profesores universitarios que daban clase en el grado de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte en el curso 2013–2014, de los cuales, veinticuatro son evaluadores de alguna agencia de evaluación y ciento treinta y nueve profesores no forman parte de ninguna agencia de evaluación. -- Metodología: el instrumento utilizado fue el apartado de artículos y revistas del Objectives: To learn the opinion of university lecturers and researchers of physical activity and sport sciences on the subject of: a) the best criteria and products for evaluating scientific articles; and b) the best national and international scientific journals. The study used a sample of 163 lecturers teaching the Bachelor’s Degree in Physical Activity and Sport Sciences during the academic year 2013–2014. Twenty-four of the lecturers were evaluators working for an evaluation agency and 139 did not work for any agency. -- Methodology: The instrument used was the article and journal section of the Cuestionario sobre criterios de calidad del personal docente e investigador universitario en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte (Questionnaire on the quality evaluation criteria employed by university lecturers and researchers of the Bachelor’s Degree in Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, CPDI-CAFD). -- Results: The criteria and evaluation products offered by Journal Citation Reports and Scopus were considered to be particularly important. The most highly valued Spanish journals were Apunts and Revista de Psicología del Deporte, while the most highly valued international publications were Journal of Sports Science and Sports Medicine. These results can be especially important for evaluating scientific publications. The applications for accreditations can be evaluated taking into account the classifications of specific sport science journals.