Search

Background: Myocardial ischemia (INOCA) and acute myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) represent emerging entities in the landscape of interventional cardiology. These conditions have heterogeneous pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical presentations, complex diagnostics, and high prognostic significance., Methods: This survey was carried out jointly by the GISE Young Committee with the support of the SICI-GISE Society and the ICOT group with the aim of evaluating the implementation of diagnostic-therapeutic pathways in cases of suspected/confirmed INOCA and MINOCA diseases. A web-based questionnaire based on 22 questions was distributed to SICI-GISE and ICOT members., Results: The survey was distributed to 1550 physicians with 104 (7%) responses. The majority of participants included interventional cardiologists (70%), in two-thirds of cases working in centers with high volume of procedures (>1000 coronary angiographies/year), who estimated a <10% annual rate of INOCA and MINOCA cases in their case load. Approximately 25% of the participants stated that they do not have the option of performing any investigation for the evaluation of patients with suspected INOCA, and less than 50% make use of advanced invasive testing for the diagnosis of MINOCA, including physiology and intravascular imaging tests. It also turns out that about 50% of respondents reported the present and future absence of dedicated diagnostic-therapeutic pathways. Even with a high perception of the clinical relevance of these diseases, about 40% of the respondents rely on clinical experience or do not deal with their management, also reporting a low prevalence of dedicated follow-up care (20% of cases followed at dedicated outpatient clinics). Factors predominantly limiting the prevalence of appropriate diagnostic and treatment pathways included the cost of materials, lack of training and expertise of practitioners, and of solid data on the long-term clinical efficacy of treatments., Conclusions: Currently, the proper management of INOCA and MINOCA disease is widely advocated but poorly implemented in clinical practice. To reverse the trend and solve the remaining controversies, it is necessary to enhance awareness, produce robust scientific data, and implement dedicated pathways for patients.

Background: Over the past decades, the improvements in the diagnostic power and availability of non-invasive cardiac imaging techniques have led to a decline of right heart catheterization (RHC) performance. However, RHC remains the gold standard for diagnosing pulmonary hypertension and an essential tool for the evaluation of patient candidacy to heart transplantation., Methods: This survey was carried out jointly by the Young Committee of GISE, with the support of the SICI-GISE Society, and the ICOT group, with the aim of evaluating how the interventional cardiology community perform RHC. A web-based questionnaire based on 20 questions was distributed to SICI-GISE members., Results: The survey was distributed to 1550 physicians with 174 (11%) responses. Most centers perform few procedures per year (<10 RHC/year) and a dedicated cardiologist is usually lacking. Patients were frequently admitted as ordinary hospitalization regimen and the most frequent indication for RHC was the hemodynamic assessment of pulmonary hypertension, followed by diagnostics of valvular diseases and advanced heart failure/heart transplantation. Indeed, the majority of participants (86%) are involved in transcatheter procedures for structural heart disease. The average time taken to perform the RHC was approximately 30-60 min. The femoral access (60%) was the most frequently used, usually by an echo-guided approach. Two-thirds of participants discontinued oral anticoagulant therapy before RHC. Only 27% of centers assess wedge position from an integrated analysis. Furthermore, the edge pressure is detected in the end-diastolic cardiac phase in half cases and in the end-expiratory phase in only 31%. The most commonly used method for cardiac output calculation was the indirect Fick method (58%)., Conclusions: Guidance on the best practice for performing RHC is currently lacking. A more precise standardization of this demanding procedure is warranted.

Background: During the last decade, thanks to contemporary evidence and technological improvements, the role of interventional cardiology in the field of cardiac conditions that are mainly treated conservatively has grown a lot. In such scenario, drug-resistant arterial hypertension and heart failure (HF) have a significant role, considering the huge number of involved patients and their impact on mortality and quality of life., Methods: This survey was jointly performed by the GISE Young Committee with the support of the SICI-GISE Society and the ICOT group with the aim of evaluating the view of the cardiology community on interventional therapies for arterial hypertension and HF. A web-based questionnaire based on 22 questions was distributed online to SICI-GISE members., Results: The survey was distributed to 1550 physicians with 156 (10%) responses, 58% of whom was under 35 years of age. Renal denervation was available in 49% of Centers, its principal indication was the evidence of severe adverse reactions to anti-hypertensive drugs (80%). Most participants agreed that, compared to past years, there is more understanding of anatomical characteristics and improvement of devices, thus increasing procedural safety; however, main limitations were: appropriate patients' selection criteria (45%), lack of robust evidence (41%) and regulatory (36%) and economical (33%) factors. In the field of HF, this survey enlightened a wide availability of conventional therapies (i.e. mechanical circulatory support, defibrillators, resynchronization) in Italy; on the other side, there is limited availability of innovative devices (i.e. atrial decompression systems, transcatheter left ventricular reshaping). Many participants expressed enthusiastic attitude in this new field, with a look for the need of further evidence in terms of safety and efficacy. Finally, in the treatment of both acute and chronic HF, many participants expressed a problem of limited patient access to advanced therapies, mainly associated with suboptimal networking among institutions., Conclusions: Device-based therapies for arterial hypertension and HF represent a promising option for selected patients; this survey highlights the importance of achieving good quality evidence in both fields, with the goal of proper identification of defined criteria for patients' selection and improvement of procedural and long-term safety and efficacy.

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) represents the third leading acute cardiovascular syndrome in the world and it is burdened with high mortality and morbidity rates. Percutaneous or catheter-based treatments of high- and intermediate-risk patients have garnered interest because of the limitations of both systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation strategies. However, data on these techniques are heterogeneous and limited to small non-randomized evidences., Methods: This survey was jointly performed by the GISE Young Committee with the support of the SICI-GISE Society and ICOT group with the aim of evaluating the view of the cardiology community on interventional therapies for PE. A web-based questionnaire based on 19 questions was distributed to SICI-GISE and ICOT members., Results: The survey was distributed to 1550 physicians with 220 (14%) responses, 65% from North Italy. Multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for patients with PE were not available in most centers (56%), and transcatheter treatment was available in 55% of centers, most of them at low volume (<5 percutaneous treatments/year). Among the devices used, mechanical thrombectomy was the predominant one (62%) in the absence of significant differences in the availability of devices within the three Italian geographic macro-areas. Respondents recognize the theoretical benefits of percutaneous treatment of PE, including: improving a prompt hemodynamic stabilization and respiratory exchange (89%) in high-risk patients, avoiding hemodynamic deterioration (39%) and right ventricular dysfunction (51%) in intermediate-risk patients, and reducing hemorrhagic complications related to systemic thrombolysis (36%). According to participants' judgement, the main factors limiting the use of percutaneous transcatheter treatment of PE in clinical practice are the lack of specific operator training (60%), lack of solid clinical data to support it (39%), difficult patient selection (34%), high costs (30%), and risk of procedural complications (26%)., Conclusions: Currently, transcatheter treatment of PE appears to be widely supported but poorly used in clinical practice. Solid evidences are needed regarding the safety and efficacy profile of the different available devices, the identification of patient selection criteria, alongside the enhancement of the availability of techniques and technologies.

Functional assessment of coronary lesions has become an integral part of routine practice in most cath labs. Such evaluation is performed using a pressure wire that allows measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR). The latter has received a class I indication with level of evidence A according to the most recent European guidelines on myocardial revascularization for the assessment of angiographically moderate coronary lesions. The present document has the following objectives: 1) to summarize the theoretical basis of FFR; 2) to provide a guideline for vasodilator therapy; 3) to summarize scientific evidence supporting FFR; 4) to provide a model of health economy evaluation focusing on resource sparing associated with the use of FFR.