1. Impact of magnetic resonance cholangiography in managing liver-transplanted patients: preliminary results of a clinical decision-making study.
- Author
-
Cereser L, Girometti R, Como G, Molinari C, Toniutto P, Bitetto D, Zuiani C, and Bazzocchi M
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Bile Duct Diseases etiology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Bile Duct Diseases diagnosis, Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance methods, Liver Transplantation adverse effects
- Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to assess the role of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the clinical decision-making process of referring physicians when managing liver-transplanted patients., Materials and Methods: Over a 6-month period, 21 liver-transplanted patients with a suspected biliary complication were referred for MRC. Referring physicians were asked to prospectively state, before and after MRC, the leading diagnosis; the level of confidence (on a 0-100% scale); the most appropriate diagnostic/therapeutic plan. Data analysis assessed was the diagnostic yield of MRC; the proportion of change in the leading diagnosis; the therapeutic efficacy (i.e. proportion of change in the initial diagnostic/therapeutic plan); the diagnostic thinking efficacy (i.e., gain in diagnostic confidence). Statistical significance was assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test. MRC accuracy was also calculated., Results: Data analysis showed a diagnostic yield of 85.7%; a proportion of change in leading diagnosis of 19.0%; a therapeutic efficacy of 42.8%; a diagnostic thinking efficacy for concordant and discordant leading diagnoses of 18.8% and 78.7%, respectively (p<0.01). MRC accuracy was 92.3%., Conclusions: MRC significantly increased the diagnostic confidence, irrespective of the concordance between pre- and posttest diagnoses. Moreover, MRC determined a change in patient management in a significant proportion of cases, leading to clinical benefits.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF