Search

Objectives: to identify the determinants of over and under-use of Pap test and mammography in the screening programme target population., Design: cross-sectional study. SETTING E PARTICIPANTS: we used data from the National Health interview conducted by the Italian National Institute of Statistics in 2012-2013 obtaining nation-wide representative samples of the female resident population aged 25-64 years (No. 32,831; target age of Pap test) and 50-69 years (No. 16,459; target age of mammography)., Main Outcome Measures: overall coverage: proportion of women in the target age with at least one test in lifetime; appropriate coverage: proportion of women reporting to have at least one or more tests following the first one with the recommended frequency (three and two years for Pap test and mammography, respectively); over-use: women reporting to repeat test at higher frequency; under-use: women reporting not having ever had a test or having test at longer intervals. For frequency outcomes, only women aged 28-64 years and 52-69 years were included for Pap test and mammography, respectively., Results: 11.9% of women have Pap test at the recommended frequency, 48.5% at shorter intervals, and 19.6% at longer intervals than recommended, while 20.0% never had a Pap test at all (39.6% under-use). 41.1% of women have a mammography at the recommended interval, 18.4% at shorter intervals, and 20.2% at longer intervals, while 20.3% never had a mammography at all. For both tests, in the North-East higher appropriate coverage and less over-use are observed, while in the South more under-use is highlighted. Young, foreigners, single, less educated, and unoccupied women have, at the same time, more over- and under-use for Pap test. Foreigner women reporting economic difficulties and single women have more mammography over and under-use., Conclusions: Pap test and, in a minor measure, mammography over-use are relevant in Italy, while large part of the population is still not covered.

Objectives: to evaluate self-perceived health status of immigrants in Italy., Design: cross-sectional study based on the representative national samples of the multipurpose surveys "Health conditions and use of health services" conducted in 2005 and 2013 by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat)., Setting and Participants: the study was conducted on the age group of 18-64: No. 80,661 in 2005, among which 3.2% were immigrants, and No. 72,476 in 2013, among which 7.1% were immigrants., Main Outcome Measures: prevalence rate ratios (PRR) calculated through log-binomial regression models, stratified by survey edition and gender, by evaluating the association between the Physical Component Score (PCS), the Mental Component Score (MCS), and the overall health index and citizenship. Adjustment for the following confounding factors was performed: age, educational level, working condition, perceived economic resources, body mass index (BMI)., Results: in 2005, immigrants had a lower probability of poor-perceived physical health, both among men (PRR: 0.79; 95%CI 0.70-0.89) and women (PRR: 0.89; 95%CI 0.82- 0.97), compared to Italians. In 2013, the perceived health advantage of immigrants was reduced for both genders (PRR males: 0.87; 95%CI 0.80-0.95; PRR females: 0.94; 95%CI 0.88-0.99). In the considered period, the prevalence of people with worse mental health conditions increases, with lower PRR among immigrants, compared to Italians. Higher probability of «NOT good» overall perceived health was also observed among immigrants residing in Italy for at least 10 years (PRR men: 1.24; PRR women: 1.15) and among immigrants men from America (PRR: 1.35)., Conclusions: from 2005 to 2013, immigrants seemed to maintain a better perception of health status than Italians. Nevertheless, study results show a decrease in self-perceived health, particularly mental health, in the considered period - apart from demographic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle factors - as well as a worse overall self-perceived health status among immigrants who stayed in Italy longer. Such results lead to suppose that the "healthy migrant effect" tends to disappear over time, maybe due to the world financial crisis. Unemployment increases and lower income also made the access to medical care more difficult, particularly among the most fragile population groups, including migrants. In this context, it is essential to promote health policies supporting equity of access to healthy lifestyles and effective health services, which are fundamental to reduce health inequalities.

Objectives: to evaluate differences in influenza vaccination coverage (IVC) in immigrants at risk for influenza-related complications, according to their area of origin and length of stay in Italy., Design: cross-sectional survey conducted on the sample of foreign citizens included in the survey on health conditions and use of health services of the Italian resident population (Italian national institute of statistics, 2012-2013)., Setting and Participants: analysis conducted on 885 foreign adult citizens (≥18 years) at risk for influenza-related complications (elderly residents ≥65 years and residents with specific chronic diseases)., Main Outcome Measures: vaccination coverage ratios (VCR) comparison between long-term immigrants (≥10 years) and recent immigrants (<10 years), and between non-African and African immigrants, adjusted by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and level of health services utilization., Results: IVC among immigrants was 15.6%, significantly higher in long-term immigrants (18.3%) compared to recent immigrants (10.2%) (VCR: 1.79; 95%CI 1.21-2.66), and in non-African immigrants (17.1%) compared to African immigrants (9.4%) (VCR: 1.82; 95%CI 1.04-3.17). After adjusting on the basis of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and for level of health services utilization between the compared subgroups, the difference in IVC according to the length of stay was greatly reduced (VCR: 1.41; 95%CI 0.94- 2.10), while IVC difference reduction according to area of origin was less relevant (VCR: 1.66; 95%CI 0.95-2.91)., Conclusions: demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and level of health services utilization explained part of the difference in IVC between the compared subgroups, particularly between long-term and recent immigrants. The difference in IVC between African immigrants and immigrants from other areas remained quite pronounced even after adjusting on the basis of these factors. This suggests that IVC, especially in African immigrants, is affected by other informal barriers, such as cultural and linguistic barriers, that need to be addressed when planning effective immunization access strategies.

Objectives: to evaluate the role of factors potentially associated with the use of medical visits by the immigrant population living in Italy, making a comparison with the Italian population., Design: cross-sectional study based on the representative sample of the population residing in Italy considered in the Survey "Health and use of health services" conducted by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat) in 2013., Setting and Participants: the study was conducted on a sample of citizens aged 18-64 years (72,476 individuals) representing a population of 37,290,440 residents in Italy (33.9 million Italians and 3,390,440 foreigners) in 2013., Main Outcome Measures: an indicator on the use of medical visits has been used as an outcome, based on people who had replied affirmatively to the question: «In the last four weeks, have you been examined by the family doctor, by the pediatrician, or by medical specialists, as an eye doctor, dentist, etc.?». Starting from this outcome, the question «Can you indicate the main reason of the visits made in the last 4 weeks?» was used to build two additional outcome variables for separately evaluating the use of medical examinations for "diseases or disorders" from the use of medical examination for "health check in the absence of diseases or disorders". For each outcome, a logistic regression model was fitted, considering as independent variables information related to socioeconomic status and to the respondent's health condition., Results: 21.4% of foreigners (18-64 years) living in Italy used medical visits during the four weeks before the interview, a percentage lower than the one recorded among Italian citizens (27.0%). Taking into account the socioeconomic characteristics, lifestyle and health status of respondents, the results of logistic regression models showed that foreigners have a lower probability than Italians to make a medical examination, both for visits motivated by any health problems (OR: 0.80; 95%CI 0.73-0.87), and in case of medical examination carried out for preventive purposes (OR: 0.72; 95%CI 0.64-0.82)., Conclusion: the more the time living in the host Country increases, the more immigrants residing in Italy tend to have the same health problems of the most disadvantaged groups of the autochthonous population, maybe beacuse of the deterioration of the so-called "healthy immigrant effect". In this context, they should be considered as more vulnerable in terms of health, and special attention must be paid to prevention. The lower use of medical visits highlights inequities in access to services. In order to reduce health inequalities, barriers that affect equitable access to health care should be removed, taking into account the heterogeneity of these sub-groups, characterized by different cultures and attitudes towards the health system.

Objectives: to compare Pap test and mammography uptake in 2005 and 2013 between Italian and immigrant women residing in Italy and to evaluate factors associated with probability of being up-to-date with screening testing in immigrant women., Design: cross-sectional study based on data of "Multipurpose survey on health and use of health services" conducted in 2005 and 2013 by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat)., Setting and Participants: the analysis includes the interviews of women included in the target age group for Pap test (25-64 years: No. 32,831) and mammography (50- 69 years: No. 16,459). Women resident in Italy with foreign citizenship are defined as "immigrants"., Main Outcome Measures: standardized prevalence rates of women self-reporting having had a Pap test and a mammography in the absence of symptoms "at least once in a lifetime"; standardized prevalence ratio of up-to-date test uptake according to recommendation, i.e., in the last three years for Pap test and two years for mammography. A logistic regression model has been built to evaluate the association between up-to-date test uptake and demographic, socioeconomic, behavioural, and health service utilization factors in immigrant women., Results: prevalence of Pap test and mammography uptake was lower in immigrants, both in 2005 and 2013. This difference reduced in 2013 due to a stronger increase in immigrants than in Italians, except for mammography. The increase in Pap test uptake among immigrant women was stronger in North-Eastern (+26,4%) and Central Italy (+26,4%), while in Southern Italy and in the Islands the increase was stronger among Italian women. Test uptake in immigrants increases with longer length of stay in Italy for both tests. Among immigrants (No. 2,601), Pap test uptake was higher in women who: had a preventive examination in the previous month (OR: 2.13); have an Italian partner (OR: 1.72); have been staying in Italy for more than 13 years; are graduated (OR: 1.87); perceive their economic resources as adequate or optimal (OR: 1.39); come from the Americas (68% more if compared to Africans). As regards mammography uptake in immigrants (No. 636), associated factors are: having had a preventive examination in the previous month (OR: 3.35); having high educational level (OR: 2.51); perceiving economic resources as adequate or optimal (OR: 1.75)., Conclusion: this study shows that there is a lower screening uptake in immigrant women, as observed in other studies conducted both in Italy and in industrialized Countries, even with longer history of immigration. In the South of Italy, the uptake is very low also for Italian women, with prevalence lower than immigrants in Northern Italy. This phenomenon suggests that high accessibility to screening facilities is effective in increasing uptake in both Italian and immigrant women. The decreasing trend in differences with longer lengths of stay, the improvement in 2013 compared to 2005, and the advantage of women with Italian partners suggest a positive effect of integration on preventive behaviours, even if there are differences between immigrants' areas of origin.

Background: Little is known about the distribution by occupation of chronic illness, disability, morbidity, and lifestyles which put health at risk., Objectives: To provide a map of the social inequalities in various dimensions of health and lifestyle by social class and for specific occupational groups. To formulate a hypothesis about the mechanisms which generate these inequalities., Methods: Prevalence rate ratios and prevalence odds ratios of perceived health, chronic illness, disability, absenteeism, trauma, smoking, and obesity calculated with data from the 1999-2000 Italian ISTAT (Central Statistics Institute) health survey; the study population includes adults (aged over 18 years) employed, or searching for a job, or withdrawn from the workforce., Results: Among workers in manual unskilled labour, construction and agriculture are noted for worse health and more unhealthy lifestyles than average. For example, perceived bad health is more widespread among agricultural labourers (OR = 1.63), masons and construction machine operators (OR = 1.75), transport drivers (OR = 1.40), male caretakers, custodians, janitors and domestic help (OR = 1.46), electro-technicians (OR = 1.44), leatherworkers and shoemakers (OR = 3.58), miners and quarrymen (OR = 2.60), earthenware and stone workers (OR = 2.14), garment and furnishings workers (OR = 1.86); in female workers excess risk for perceived bad health was present among agricultural labourers (OR = 2.08), caretakers, custodians, janitors and domestic helpers (OR = 1.49), waitresses, cooks and bartenders, (OR = 1.44), and textile workers (OR = 1.67). Smoking was more widespread among chemical workers (OR = 1.41), and in miners and quarrymen (OR = 1.30). An excess risk of smoking of 20-25% was evident in spinners, weavers and finishers; masons, (and) builders; waiters, cooks and bartenders; garment and furnishings workers; porters and warehouse workers. The risk was 10% higher among foundry workers and forgers, plumbers, carpenters and welders, and transport drivers. Among women the propensity to smoke was higher among waitresses, cooks and bartenders (OR = 1.37), cleaners, commerce and service workers (OR = 1.22). Other occupational groups with an increased smoking prevalence, where women were less represented, included: chemical workers (OR = 2.25), butchers (OR = 1.97), postwomen (OR = 1.58), plastics workers (OR = 1.56), shippers (OR = 1.37)., Conclusions: It can be hypothesized on the one hand that there are factors and mechanisms common to the various occupational groups belonging to the same social class; on the other, there are factors and mechanisms specific to certain occupational categories. The latter can generate specific health subcultures. A greater integration between qualitative and quantitative research is recommended, which would yield better explanations of the observed inequalities.

The results presented in this paper are part of the largest survey on unconventional medicine conducted so far (more than 140 000 people). Families with high socio-economical levels had the highest probability of choosing unconventional medicine. The use is strongly related to geographic area probably due to different availability of structures able to provide these therapies. At individual level the choice to use unconventional medicine seems a "cultural" trend associated with healthy life styles, and with positive attitudes towards prevention. It is interesting also to underline that the use of unconventional medicine is more frequent among women. Almost all users of unconventional medicine (80%) declare to be in good health, and this can indicate that unconventional therapies are mostly used for not serious and self limited conditions. Furthermore, use of unconventional medicine is often associated with a greater use of conventional drugs and with a greater frequency of check-up. This suggests a "complementary", more than "alternative" use of this kind of therapies.