Search

Obstructive sleep apneas (OSA) are a breathing disorder characterized by recurrent apneas and hypopneas associated with complete or partial obstruction of the upper airways during sleep, resulting in disturbed sleep architecture, repeated hypoxemia and awakenings, and daytime sleepiness. OSA syndrome affects up to 34% of men and 17% of women in Western countries. Abnormalities in upper airway anatomy (frequently due to obesity), muscle tone, or neural control of breathing are the main causes. OSA is associated with impaired cognitive function and favors the onset of hypertension, being a major determinant of resistant hypertension, and may favor cardiovascular diseases (e.g., coronary artery disease and heart failure), thereby increasing mortality. Polysomnography and (cardio)-respiratory portable systems are used to diagnose and determine the severity of OSA. Management of OSA includes lifestyle modifications, such as weight loss and avoidance of supine sleep position, and continuous positive airway pressure. Mandibular advancement devices and upper airway surgery may also be appropriate for some patients. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation and pharmacological interventions are currently investigated to improve symptoms and outcomes.

Randomized controlled trials showing a significant benefit are met with enthusiasm because they may change the standard of care for patients who share the clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics of trial participants. Nonetheless, a well-designed and fully executed trial with neutral or negative findings also represents a critically important investigation deserving careful scientific scrutiny. In this paper we propose a 10-step approach to the interpretation of neutral or negative trials to exclude important methodological issues before concluding that the treatment really does not work. We will discuss this approach using the most classic trials of the past and some notable examples among superiority trials (mostly phase 3 trials) published over the last years.

Central apneas (CA) and periodic breathing (PB) are the most common related breathing disorders in heart failure, being observed in up to 50% of patients. Once considered only a sleep-related phenomenon, actually CA/PB occur across the whole 24 h period and their presence in the awake patient even in the upright position and during physical effort has been associated with a worse clinical profile and a greater mortality. Chemoreflex activation, circulatory time delay and altered plant gain are the pathophysiological determinants. While the use of guideline-recommended medical and device treatment represents the first step in the management of CA in heart failure patients, no specific therapy has been demonstrated to reduce CA-related impact on mortality. In particular, the use of non-invasive ventilation has yielded contradictory results in the context of large-scale randomized clinical trials. The design and testing of therapies targeting the pathophysiological triggers of CA, such as chemoreflex sensitivity, may prove valuable in the next future.

Cardiac fibrosis is characterized by the deposition of extracellular matrix proteins in the spaces between cardiomyocytes following both acute and chronic tissue damage events, resulting in the remodeling and stiffening of heart tissue. Fibrosis plays an important role in the pathogenesis of many cardiovascular disorders, including heart failure and myocardial infarction. Several studies have identified fibroblasts, which are induced to differentiate into myofibroblasts in response to various types of damage, as one of the most important cell types involved in the fibrotic process. There are currently no drugs with primarily antifibrotic action approved for clinical use, as the evidence of a clinical efficacy of these drugs is extremely limited, despite the numerous encouraging results from experimental studies. A new approach is represented by the use of chimeric antigen receptor T cells engineered in vivo using lipid nanoparticles containing mRNA encoding a receptor directed against the fibroblast activation protein, expressed by activated cardiac fibroblasts. This strategy has proved to be safe and effective in reducing myocardial fibrosis and improving cardiac function in mouse models of cardiac fibrosis. Clinical studies are required to test this novel approach in humans.

Heart failure (HF) has a complex pathophysiology including neurohormonal activation, inflammation and oxidative stress that, together with comorbidities, promote progressive myocardial damage and cardiac remodeling. Over the years the study of these pathogenic mechanisms has led to the identification of several analytes potentially useful as biomarkers in HF. High-sensitivity troponins and soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 are the most promising biomarkers for risk stratification of HF, with independent value to natriuretic peptides. Other biomarkers currently being evaluated as predictors of adverse outcome in HF are galectin-3, growth differentiation factor 15, mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin as well as makers of renal dysfunction. The use of multi-marker scores as well as the application of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics could further refine the management of HF.

Heart failure (HF) is the final common pathway of many cardiovascular diseases and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Natural history of HF patients can be improved when early diagnosis is achieved, and a timely treatment is initiated. Circulating biomarkers, reflecting pathophysiological pathways involved in HF development and progression, help clinicians diagnose and manage patients with HF. Natriuretic peptides are cardioprotective hormones released by cardiomyocytes in response to pressure/volume overload. B-type natriuretic peptides, namely B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, have been widely validated as tools for diagnosis and risk stratification of HF, and their use appears promising also for screening the population at risk and as a guide for preventive measures halting progression towards HF. Conversely, there is conflicting evidence regarding their role as a guidance for HF therapy.

The purpose of this study was to establish the value of xeroradiographic patterns and their applicability in the automatic diagnosis of breast diseases. Such an evaluation is based on the comparison with the histologic examination, irrespective of the overall diagnostic judgement previously formulated. From an analysis of the material examined it was possible to ascertain the distribution frequency, the sensitivity, the specificity, the discriminating capacity, and finally the weight of each radiologic sign considered. There are xeroradiographic signs that are apparent almost exclusively in the malignant pathology and therefore can be considered as positive indices of the malignancy of the alteration. The specificity of the radiologic signs considered is very high, whereas the same cannot be said for the sensitivity. Moreover, a linear discriminating analysis made it possible to identify those semiologic elements which, with a minor probability of error, would attribute the pathologic process to the class verified histologically, for malignant neoplasms as well as benign tumors and dysplastic processes.