Search

Introduction: Given the significance of healthcare decisions in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and their impact on patients' lives, this study aims to map the existing literature on decision regret in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations., Methods: A scoping review was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria focused on decision regret in the female population with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations, with no restrictions on the methodologies of the included studies, but only in the English language. The selection process led to the inclusion of 13 studies., Results: The analysis revealed a significant trend toward decision regret among patients facing complex medical choices. The quality of healthcare communication, decision support, and genetic counselling emerged as key factors influencing patients' perceptions and experiences, with direct implications for their quality of life and psychological well-being. The results suggest that these decisions considerably impact patients, both in terms of clinical outcomes and emotional experiences., Discussion: The investigation highlights the vital importance of a personalized care approach, emphasizing the critical role of managing patients' emotional and psychological complexity. Managing decision regret requires acute attention to individual needs and effective communication to mitigate emotional impact and improve patient outcomes., Conclusions: Insights from a nursing perspective in the analysis of results indicate the need for informed, empathetic, and integrated care that considers the emotional complexity of women with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations in their lives and health choices.

Introduction: There are no national data aimed to describe nurses' perception of variability in delivering nursing activities in relation to best practice and inequality in receiving nursing care. Moreover, there are no validated tools to be used in research. Therefore, the aims of this study are: a) to develop and validate a questionnaire to describe nurses' perceptions of variability and inequality in the oncology setting; b) to test content and face validity; c) to provide preliminary data (pilot study) to plan strategies for future national studies., Material and Methods: This is a multi-phase and multi-method study. Phase 1 is focused on questionnaire's development (i.e., literature review and consensus discussion); phase 2 is aimed to determine content and face validity of the questionnaire; and phase 3 was a pilot data collection through an on-line survey., Results: The questionnaire that was developed yielded an adequate content and face validity (S-CVI=0.89 and CVR >0.60 for all items). The pilot study (75 nurses) found that nurse participants perceived as the most relevant categories pain and gastrointestinal and oral cavity dysfunctions. Fatigue, impairments of social function and psychological disorders were the areas in which greater variability and inequalities in receiving nursing care emerged. Overall, more than 50% of nurses reported variability and inequalities in oncology symptom management (in the investigated categories)., Conclusions: The study results support the content validity of the questionnaire that can thereby be used for pan-national investigations.