Search

The chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome may present with a variety of phenotypes. Its symptoms generally include a characteristic facial dysmorphisms and multiplex developmental disorders. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is the current method of choice for the diagnosis if typical multiple defects and/or symptoms are present. The authors present the history of two patients who were followed-up for minor anomalies and various developmental disorders for several years in the genetic counseling office of the authors, but definitive diagnosis was not established. However, when DNA samples of the two patients were recently tested with array comparative genome hybridization, a diagnostic method which has already been used in their institute for several years, the results indicated deletion of the 11.2 region on the long arm of chromosome 22 in both patients. The authors draw attention to the incidence and wide phenotypic spectrum of the chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome, and show that its identification can be aided with the novel molecular cytogenetic method available in their laboratory.

Introduction: In the past decade the study of genomic disorders has received more interest. Array comparative genome hybridization is a widely spread diagnostic method in the research of genomic disorders. This method was implemented in the laboratory of the authors in 2012., Aim: This molecular cytogenetic method was first used to examine patients with complex developmental disorders in whom no genetic background was identified by traditional methods., Method: The authors complemented traditional diagnostic methods with array comparative genome hybridization, which has not been used in routine diagnostics in Hungary so far., Results: Using this novel method the authors were able to identify genomic alterations in 7 out of 18 patients with complex developmental disorders. They found de novo alterations in 6 out of 7 patients, which were most likely causative in the development of the phenotype, while in one case they detected a familial genomic alteration. This method helped the authors to determine the breakpoint of genomic variation in their patients and delineate the affected genes contributing to the phenotype., Conclusions: These results call attention to the usefulness of next generation diagnostic methods available in the laboratory of the authors.