1. תוכחת הנביא והחיבור הצפוני: 10 כמקרה מבחן להבנת תהליכי חיבור ועריכה – שופטים ו 7 בספר שופטים ובחיבור הדויטרונומיסטי.
- Author
-
חגית שבתאי
- Abstract
Judges 6:7–10, which tells of an anonymous prophet rebuking Israel for not obeying Yhwh, carries with it questions about the composition and redaction of the Former Prophets as a whole, and of the Book of Judges in particular. The classification of this passage as a redactional insertion is widely agreed upon, but the identity of the redactor and of the school to which he belonged is still disputed. For over half a century, biblical scholars have casually attributed interpolations in the Former Prophets, including Judg 6:7–10, to the Deuteronomistic School. The publication of a small fragment of Judges from Qumran in 1989 (4QJudga) diverted the discussion to the realm of textual criticism but did not affect the customary attribution of the passage to a (late) Deuteronomistic, or sometimes post-Deuteronomistic, hand. In this paper I review the arguments for a Deuteronomistic or post-Deuteronomistic attribution of the passage and highlight their weaknesses. I propose an alternative identification of Judg 6:7–10 as pre-Deuteronomistic. According to this suggestion, the passage belongs to a redactional stratum of a Northern composition that constitutes most of the Book of Judges as well as 1 Samuel 1–12 and influenced both Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomistic school. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020