Search

Copyright of Die Urologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Urologe A is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In men aged 40-83 years, the overall incidence of urinary retention is 4.5-6.8 cases per 1000 men per year. The incidence increases significantly with age, so that a man in his 70 s has a 10% chance and a man in his 80 s has a more than 30% chance of experiencing an episode of acute urinary retention [1]. The goal of diagnosis is to quickly reach a finding through clinical examination and ultrasound to be able to relieve the bladder. The first maneuver is catheterization, followed by, if necessary, initiation of pharmacological therapy that targets the underlying cause. Despite the high association of urinary retention with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a comprehensive history and diagnosis are crucial to identify possible rare and complex causes and to enable targeted treatment. The challenge lies in finding the balance between rapid symptomatic treatment and thorough investigation of atypical and rare pathologies to develop individually adapted and effective therapy strategies., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Urinary stones often affect younger people. Because the risk of recurrence is high, regular follow-up is important for individuals at risk., Objective: To summarize the extent of urinary stones and the health and economic impact in the population; to provide recommendations for general and stone-specific follow-up., Materials and Methods: Analysis and discussion of publications and guideline recommendations., Results: The risk of recurrence after a stone attack can be high depending on the risk profile. An initial metabolic workup should be performed promptly after stone therapy. General dietary management should be intensified by stone-specific dietary management depending on the risk profile. Nutritional counseling may be helpful. Imaging after stone therapy is used to monitor the success of treatment and detect recurrences early. Since the risk of recurrence can vary greatly depending on the stone composition, not only the type of imaging but also its frequency should be adjusted accordingly. The same applies to the various stone therapies, which help determine the frequency and type of imaging follow-up. Exact guidelines and cost-effectiveness analyses of follow-up examinations after stone therapy are unfortunately missing., Conclusions: Acute urolithiasis represents an excruciating experience for patients. Accordingly, their willingness to undergo metaphylaxis and follow-up shortly after the event is strong. Since the risk of recurrence after a stone attack can be very high, regular follow-up after stone therapy is essential. The frequency of follow-up should be adapted to the probability of stone recurrence., (© 2022. The Author(s).)