Search

Background: Free hospital choice is promoted in health policy through public quality reporting. Previous studies on hospital choice mostly survey patients for specific elective procedures. This study examines all full inpatient surgical patients and compares them to those in other specialties. Research questions are: How many patients make their own decisions about the hospital? How much time do they have before admission? Where do they obtain information and what are their important decision criteria?, Materials and Methods: This study evaluates cross-sectional primary data on hospital choice collected by questionnaire from 1925 consecutively hospitalised patients from 11 medical specialties and 3 levels of care, including 438 surgical patients from 6 general surgery departments., Results: Three quarters of surgical patients decide on the hospital themselves. Their own previous experience with the hospital is an important source of information and decision-making criterion for a good half of the patients, along with relatives and outpatient treatment providers as well as the hospital reputation., Conclusion: Many surgical patients decide in favour of a hospital because of the trust they have built up through previous treatment in the hospital, which they experience as satisfactory. The professional quality of treatment is thus the greatest impact factor on patients, their relatives and outpatient treatment providers. It is important to actively and specifically address and clarify possible dissatisfaction on the part of the patient before discharge., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: People with intellectual disabilities (ID) show an increased morbidity. Their access to healthcare could be a contributing factor, but there is little data on this in Germany. This paper addresses the question of what barriers and facilitators exist in the use of medical outpatient healthcare for people with ID, considering their own perspective and the perspectives of their accompanying relatives and their general practitioners (GPs)., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, people with ID in three sheltered workshops, their relatives and their GPs were interviewed by means of questionnaires. The data were evaluated descriptively, and a statistical comparison of the perspectives of the people with ID and their relatives was performed. The content structure follows Cantrell's pathway model (identifying need, accessing services and interaction during a consultation)., Results: People with ID communicate complaints to their relatives, who usually accompany them to medical appointments. There are more organisational than spatial barriers. The treatment is sometimes impeded by fears, restlessness or not allowing examinations. It is difficult to find experienced health professionals, which is why a list of such practices and, structurally, medical centres for people with ID would be beneficial. The views of people with ID and their relatives show hardly any differences. GPs cite increased treatment effort, desire for further training and appropriate remuneration., Conclusions: Relatives play an important role in the medical care of people with ID. Difficulties in care can arise from the specific, more complex requirements in treating people with ID, which present as organisational difficulties but also require an active readiness for inclusion., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Study Objective: People with intellectual disabilities have a lower life expectancy and more frequent comorbidities than the general population and have unmet health needs. Insufficient medical care is suspected to be one reason, for which little data is available in Germany. The study therefore focuses on the question of how people with intellectual disabilities make use of medical care, including screening and preventive measures., Method: In a cross-sectional study in 3 workshops for people with intellectual disabilities, the use of health care was surveyed by means of questionnaires from their relatives. The evaluation was carried out descriptively and by means of inferential statistics comparing participants with the general population as well as within the group of participants for socio-demographic differences., Results: Almost all 181 participants (participation rate 19.3%) had a family doctor. In comparison to the general population, the participants made more frequent use of the services of general practitioners and the care provided by numerous other specialist areas. They made less frequent use of screening for colon, breast, cervix and prostate and more frequent use for skin cancer and general check-up. Dental check-ups and preventive measures showed no difference. Participants living in institutional settings made more use of the regular services than those living with relatives or alone. Participants with a migration background were less aware of care services., Conclusions: The results do not show any indications of a general undersupply of health care. Participation in cancer screening with more complex examinations should be encouraged, especially for people with mental disabilities living alone or with relatives. Those with a migration background and their families should be specifically informed., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Statutory quality assurance (QA) serves to ensure and further develop the quality of service provision. Particularly prominent in Germany's acute inpatient care are mandatory quality reports (QRs) and participation in external quality assessments (eQAs). Their effects have not yet been comprehensively evaluated., Objectives: What are the effects of eQAs and QRs on the quality of care?, Materials and Methods: Based on a selective literature review, international evidence on the effects of QA was compiled. This was supplemented by analyses of the quality reports of the Federal Office for Quality Assurance (BQS), the Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care (AQUA), and the Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare (IQTIG), which have been responsible for eQAs since 2001., Results: According to international literature, at most weak effects of these measures can be expected, especially on process quality. Studies from Germany mostly observe only uncontrolled temporal trends and partly show improved quality indicators. Only one controlled study each was able to show weak positive effects on outcome and process quality for eQAs and QRs, respectively., Conclusions: There are no convincing evaluation results for either the QRs or the eQAs. Deficiencies in the addressee-oriented design of the QRs and the reported indicator results in terms of their validity, risk adjustment, and temporal availability can be cited as potential causes. Statutory QA should be revised by paying more attention to the prerequisites for successful performance feedback and by again creating room for an intrinsically motivated assessment of one's own quality of care., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background:  The free choice of hospital by patients is promoted by health policy and is to be supported by the quality reports of hospitals. But how do patients choose a hospital? How many can decide for themselves, where do they inform themselves and what are their decision criteria in the specific situation? This will be answered for inpatients of internal medicine in comparison to those of other specialties., Methods:  The data originate from an observational study. The random sample, stratified by specialties and hospital care levels, was collected in 46 departments of 17 hospitals from 15 cities and municipalities in North Rhine-Westphalia. The weighted sample evaluates 758 patients of internal medicine and 1168 patients of other specialties descriptively and inferentially., Results:  Internal medicine patients are older, more often men, without a migration background and chronically ill, and also more often pretreated as inpatients. About half decide on the hospital themselves, with their own knowledge of the hospital through a previous stay being the most important source of information and the important decision criteria being their own previous experience, the hospital call and the recommendation of outpatient treatment providers. The small proportion of patients with more time before admission choose more actively., Conclusions:  In internal medicine, fewer patients can decide on the hospital themselves. These then decide quite predominantly on the basis of their previous experience with the hospital and continue the renewed treatment in the hospital with which they are also familiar. A small proportion of younger, more educated and less hospital-experienced patients inform themselves more actively before elective procedures. Patients' treatment experiences are central to their own and their relatives' choice of hospital via social exchange., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Objective: The rigid separation of outpatient and inpatient care in the German health care system prevents continuity of care, although it has been shown to be of great importance for psychiatric patients. This study analyzes continuity of care of a model hospital with a global treatment budget according to § 64b SGB V and constant treatment staff across all settings in comparison to a control hospital with regular financing without such a team., Methods: In a prospective cohort study with a 20-month observation period, we collected data on continuity of care of 220 model and 215 control clinic patients., Results: The model clinic achieved significant higher continuity of care than the control clinic, both during inpatient treatment at the time of recruitment and across all settings during the observation period., Conclusion: A global treatment budget can create the necessary conditions for more flexible psychiatric care and better implementation of continuity of care., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: The epidemiology of patient safety problems (PSPs) in the German ambulatory care sector is largely unknown. So far, there has been a lack of appropriate survey instruments., Objective: Development and application of a questionnaire (PSP-AMB), which records the epidemiology of PSP in the ambulatory care sector from the patient's perspective by using computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI) on a population sample of ≥40-year-olds., Methods: The questionnaire items were developed by means of a literature search and guided interviews with ambulatory care physicians (N=10) and patients (N=20). The conversion to CATI and its application in the field was carried out by a survey institute. Qualitative (N=20) and quantitative (N=110) pretests were conducted before going into the field. The sample was generated via randomly generated fixed and mobile telephone numbers., Results: PSP-AMB collects 32 PSPs in seven areas of medical treatment, from medical history-taking to practice organisation, and surveys all PSPs from the last 12 months (PSP-one-year incidence), PSPs with harm since the age of 40 (PSP-40+-prevalence), as well as PSPs resulting in death or severe need for care via proxy survey of the participants' parents and children. Detailed questions record the consequences and handling of PSPs and participants' socio-demographic data. Between May and October 2018, a total of 10,037 citizens (participation rate: 12.4%) were interviewed. The drop-out rate was 8.3%. The sample represents the German population aged 40 years or older., Discussion: PSP-AMB is suitable for systematically recording PSPs in the ambulatory care sector from the patient's perspective. Thus, PSP-AMB meets the international demand to actively involve patients as a valuable source of information to improve patient safety., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Study Aim: The minimum volume standards for hospitals in Germany, in force since 2004, provide four exemptions for non-complying hospitals. This study investigates the extent and importance of these exemptions for complex procedures on the oesophagus and pancreas for all non-complying hospitals and for the revised minimum volume regulations in force since the beginning of 2018., Method: Longitudinal, descriptive analyses of data on minimum volume standards and their exemptions for complex procedures on the oesophagus and pancreas, as presented by the hospital quality report cards of the reporting years from 2006 to 2014., Results: For each year and both procedures, about 120 hospitals with some 500 cases report non-compliance with the minimum volume standards. Of these a third report no exemptions (with 180 procedures), a third state emergencies (110), and another third report exemptions due to internal hospital restructuring (210). Ensuring geographical access to care as an exemption is of no importance. After the three year exemption period for installation of a new service line, 20% of the hospitals with procedures on the oesophagus and 30% on the pancreas complied with the minimum volume standards. After the two-year period for staff realignment, the figures were 40 and 50%, respectively., Conclusion: Exemptions do not entirely explain all procedures performed by hospitals not complying with the minimum volume standards. The revised minimum volume regulations' restructuring of exemptions to "emergencies" and "new or renewed service lines" with a two year exemption period, are concordant with the empirical findings of this study., Competing Interests: Dr. de Cruppé erklärt, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Prof. Geraedts wurde von der Bundesärztekammer für Gutachtertätigkeit zu Mindestmengen honoriert. Er bekam vom Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss Honorare und Reisekostenerstattung für Vorträge zum Thema Mindestmengen; vom Bundesgesundheitsministerium erhielt er Studienunterstützung zum Thema Mindestmengen., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: The outcome volume relationship has been analysed for more than 30 years and debated ever since. For German hospitals minimum volume standards (MVS) have been introduced for some procedures in 2004. Hospitals have to report procedure volumes in their quality reports. This study analyses for the first time how constant hospitals comply with minimum volume standards over time., Materials and Methods: Data used are the reported volumes, which hospitals published in their quality reports in 2006, 2008, and 2010. The case volumes of complex oesophageal and pancreatic interventions, total knee replacements, and liver, kidney and stem cell transplantations (KTX, LTX, STX) are analysed in a retrospective, longitudinal study design., Results: More than 80 % of hospitals conducting LTX, KTX, and total knee replacements are complying with MVS constantly, in STX 57 % of hospitals comply, and with complex pancreatic and oesophageal interventions compliance is 44 and 28 %, respectively. Twenty-seven to 36 % of hospitals conducting the three last mentioned procedures vary in complying with the MVS over time. 3.5 % (total knee replacements) up to 26 % (pancreatic interventions) and 37 % (oesophageal interventions) of all hospitals constantly fail to comply with MVS. Hospitals constantly over the MVS treat more than 80 % of all patients, except in complex oesophageal interventions. Hospitals with varying compliance in oesophageal and pancreatic interventions are mainly hospitals with 100 to 599 beds. Only very few hospitals of these two procedure types stop conducting the interventions after failing to comply with MVS earlier, the other some 120 hospitals for each intervention type treat 2 cases on average per year., Conclusion: The MVS on KTX, LTX, STX, and total knee replacement are almost constantly complied with. A considerable number of hospitals conducting oesophageal and pancreatic interventions never or rarely meet the MVS without discontinuing this type of intervention. At least for hospitals that never comply with MVS on oesophageal and pancreatic interventions, requirements and possibilities for a regional patient transfer should be studied in depth., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: To improve quality of breast cancer care, in 2004 the state of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany, began to appoint 51 breast cancer centres. These centres comprise 91 hospitals performing breast cancer surgery which have - amongst other things - to fulfill minimum volume standards. The aim of our study was to analyse if the intended regionalisation of care from 252 hospitals performing breast cancer surgery formerly to the appointed hospitals had taken place by the year 2010., Methods: We used data for the years 2004-2010 from the agency for quality assurance in North Rhine-Westphalia concerning breast cancer care and analysed trends concerning the number of hospitals performing breast cancer surgery, case volumes, and achievement of minimum volume standards by performing descriptive and inferential statistics., Results: Between 2004 and 2010 the number of breast cancer cases increased by 36.6% from 12 975 to 17 724 cases (p<0.001, Wilcoxon test). Simultaneously, the number of hospitals performing breast cancer surgery decreased from 252 to 208 whereby more than double the number of planned hospitals still performed breast cancer surgery. The case volumes of the 71 appointed hospitals for which we had individual data over the entire period of time increased by 49.4% from 8 103 cases in year 2004 to 12 105 cases in 2010. Assuming that case volume trends of those 20 appointed hospitals of which we did not have individual data developed uniformly to all other appointed hospitals, the proportion of cases that were operated in not appointed hospitals decreased from 20% in year 2004 to 12.5% in 2010 (p<0.001, χ2 test). Simultaneously, the proportion of cases that were operated in hospitals not achieving minimum volume standards decreased from 42.7% in year 2004 to 12.1% in 2010 (p<0.001, χ2 test)., Conclusion: The establishment of breast cancer centres in NRW regionalised breast cancer surgery. In fact, in 2010 breast cancer surgery still took place in more than 100 not appointed hospitals. However, these hospitals were responsible for only a small proportion of breast cancer surgery., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: This study examines the quality criteria which, from the perspective of non-hospital based physicians, are relevant in order to give patients quality-oriented recommendations in the selection of a suitable hospital or specialist., Methods: A primary telephone survey of 300 physicians from 5 specialist groups collected relevance assessments of 59 quality criteria for hospitals, GPs and specialist practices. A descriptive bi- and multivariate analysis was performed using McNemar tests, correlation and regression analysis., Results: Next to the personal experiences which the physician and his patients made with the hospital or non-hospital based colleague in the past, there is a general interest in vital structural and outcome parameters of hospitals and medical practices. Physicians deem the nature and scope of services offered by the hospitals and medical practices as less relevant. In 12 of the 59 examined quality criteria, the relevance assessments differ depending on whether the physician is dealing with an elective admission to hospital or a referral to a GP or specialist. In the analysis of possible correlations between preferences and factors which might be influencing the physician, gender, age and specialisation were found to have an effect., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Patient and physician attributes influence medical decisions as non-medical factors. The current study examines the influence of patient age and gender and physicians' gender and years of clinical experience on medical decision making in patients with undiagnosed diabetes type 2., Method: A factorial experiment was conducted to estimate the influence of patient and physician attributes. An identical physician patient encounter with a patient presenting with diabetes symptoms was videotaped with varying patient attributes. Professional actors played the "patients". A sample of 64 randomly chosen and stratified (gender and years of experience) primary care physicians was interviewed about the presented videos., Results: Results show few significant differences in diagnostic decisions: Younger patients were asked more frequently about psychosocial problems while with older patients a cancer diagnosis was more often taken into consideration. Female physicians made an earlier second appointment date compared to male physicians. Physicians with more years of professional experience considered more often diabetes as the diagnosis than physicians with less experience., Conclusion: Medical decision making in patients with diabetes type 2 is only marginally influenced by patients' and physicians' characteristics under study., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Nine out of ten demonstration projects on clinical benchmarking funded by the German Ministry of Health were evaluated. Project reports and interviews were uniformly analysed using a list of criteria and a scheme to categorize the realized benchmarking approach. At the end of the funding period four benchmarking networks had implemented all benchmarking steps, and six were continued after funding had expired. The improvement of outcome quality cannot yet be assessed. Factors promoting the introduction of benchmarking networks with regard to organisational and process aspects of benchmarking implementation were derived., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Aim: Development of a starter set of quality indicators for application by general practitioners and specialists in the outpatient care sector., Methodology: The results of a systematic search for national and international quality indicators relevant to the outpatient care sector in Germany provided the basis for the indicator selection process. Outpatient care doctors rated the relevance and feasibility of the indicators according to the RAND/UCLA method. In a further step the indicators were tested in medical practices, focussing on data availability and accessibility., Results: As a result, we established a set of 48 reliable, structurally developed and patient-oriented quality indicators which can be used for quality improvement in the outpatient care setting, both by specialists and general practitioners., Discussion: The project provides important information with regard to the future development and use of quality indicators. Depending on the potential fields of application, the development of new indicators as well as a corresponding IT infrastructure is of high priority. Possible unintended effects of indicators will have to be considered.

Benchmarking as a tool of organisational development is directed towards improvement through learning from others. The German Ministry of Health funded 10 demonstration projects on clinical benchmarking in order to study the prerequisites to and the methods for its dissemination. The evaluation was carried out as an observational study in 2008. The evaluation tools used included a list of criteria to uniformly describe benchmarking networks and a scheme to categorize the realized benchmarking steps., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

A survey among 232 German health care organisations addressed benchmarking projects in patient care. 53 projects were reported and analysed using a benchmarking development scheme and a list of criteria. None of the projects satisfied all the criteria. Rather, examples of best practice for single aspects have been identified., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Introduction: In 2004, Germany introduced annual minimum volumes nationwide on five surgical procedures (kidney, liver, stem cell transplantation, complex oesophageal, and pancreatic interventions). In 2006, minimum volumes for total knee prosthesis were added and the five established minimum volumes were almost doubled. Since minimum volumes usually result in the regionalisation of procedures, especially patients from rural areas are impeded by geographical access problems. The aim of our study was to analyse regional and time-related differences in the distances patients travelled to hospitals performing minimum volume relevant procedures between 2004 and 2006 in Germany., Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of data from the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK). Using a geographical information system we analysed the distances that patients who underwent one of the six minimum volume procedures travelled to the hospital in the years 2004-2006. We performed t-tests to analyse differences between the 16 German Federal States and the years of observation while correcting for multiple testing., Results: On average patients travelled between 28.6/28.0 km (2004/2006) for knee prosthesis and 78.9 km for stem cell transplantation (2004) and 97.4 km for liver transplantation (2006). In 2004, distances travelled differed up to a factor of 9.9 [comparing distances travelled to stem cell transplantation of patients of the states of Berlin (30.6 km) and Hamburg (303 km)]. In 2006, the maximum difference (factor 12.2) was observed for oesophageal interventions comparing distances travelled in the states of Bremen (7.2 km) and Saarland (88.8 km). For almost all comparisons there were significant differences of the minimum and maximum distances travelled in one of the Federal States compared to the federal average. Comparing distances travelled in 2004 and 2006 we found only small and inconsistent variations., Discussion: We found that geographical access to inpatient care for minimum volume procedures in Germany differs sizably between the Federal States in 2004 and 2006. In spite of doubling the minimum volumes in 2006, the distances patients travelled to hospitals hardly change. This may be caused by an inert implementation of the minimum volume regulation leading to an unchanged number of hospitals providing the respective procedures., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart, New York.)

Since 2004 hospitals in Germany publish structured report cards bi-yearly. Content and scope of these mandatory public reports are still under discussion. Therefore we provide an up to date overview on forms and effects of public reports. By enabling transparency, comparative reports on the quality of health care aim at supporting patients to choose better performing health care providers and motivating health care providers to enhance quality improvement activities. Internationally existing public reports range from reports on national health systems on the whole to reports on the quality of particular procedures of individual health care providers. Contrary to the multitude of public reports, the evidence on the effects of public reporting remains scant. The few existing studies show that hospitals react on the public reports by some quality improvements. However, regarding the selection of providers and the quality of care they only show inconsistent effects of public reporting. Moreover, unsolved methodical problems of pubic reporting and potentially unintended consequences have to be considered. Therefore the question remains whether the expected effects in terms of quality improvements outbalance the unintended consequences in the long run and if the investments in public reporting will be paid off., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart, New York.)

Background: As requested by the Federal Joint Committee, the German Hospital Institute and the Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf carried out an investigation of the minimum volume regulation for hospitals based on the Social Legislation Code. Total knee replacement forms one minimum volume field. Since 2006 hospitals with a performance rate of less than the minimum volume of 50 patients a year with knee replacement are no longer permitted to conduct this procedure. The object of the present analysis is to investigate the impact of the minimum volume regulation for total knee replacement., Methods: The results are based on two hospital surveys on the application of the minimum volume regulation for total knee replacement. 279 hospitals (response rate: 41,8%) participated in 2006 and 297 hospitals in 2007 (response rate: 47,5%). The results are representative of General hospitals with total knee replacements., Results: As expected, hospitals above and below the minimum volume cut-off differ in size. To date the minimum volume regulation has led to a rather selective exclusion of hospitals from care. In the case of total knee replacement 13,7% of the hospitals have been excluded. Most hospitals that do not reach the minimum volume are still participating in care. A decisive reason for this is the existence of exception rules. In hospitals exceeding the minimum volume, certain quality management tools for knee replacement are more widely spread than in hospitals that do not reach the minimum volume. As a consequence of the minimum volume regulation, the participating hospitals improved their position in the market. Vice versa, the excluded hospitals are more concerned about the damage to their image that may result from being excluded from care. With respect to the further development of the minimum volume regulation, the hospitals do not share the same point of view., Discussion: Because, as yet, only few hospitals with low case numbers have been excluded from care, the immediate effects of the minimum volume regulation on the affected hospitals and hospital care in general are limited. The surveys showed a considerable uncertainty among all participants about the application and effects of the minimum volume regulation in hospitals.

Objective: In 2004 five minimum volumes were introduced for the first time into German hospitals. The structural effects of these minimum volumes are presented as the first part of a health service research to evaluate the minimum volume regulation. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/METHODS: The investigation is based on the mandatory hospital quality reports for 2004. Data were extracted from 1710 quality reports, descriptively analysed and applied to the modified minimum volumes for 2006., Results: In 2004, 485 out of 1710 German hospitals providing acute care and approximately 23,128 cases, i.e., 0.14% of all hospital cases, were affected by at least one minimum volume regulation. The number of affected hospitals varies considerably between the German Federal Sates with 16% in Bavaria and 75% in Bremen. In 2004 (and presumably 2006) the following hospital numbers will comply with the minimum volume regulation: liver transplantation 100% (63%), kidney transplantation 91% (84%), stem cell transplantation 84% (65%), complex oesophageal interventions 71% (40%), complex pancreatic interventions 82% (51%). On a case level, 4% of kidney transplantation cases and up to 22% of complex oesophageal interventions were to be redistributed. Viewing the hospital size by number of beds, smaller (100-300 beds) and medium size hospitals (300-600 beds) are affected in complex oesophageal and pancreatic interventions, whereas in transplantations medium and large hospitals (>600 beds) are affected. Considering the regional distribution on a district level, the number of districts with at least one hospital providing the respective service will decrease from 2004 to 2006, with the strongest reduction in complex oesophageal interventions from 172 to 82 districts (-53%)., Conclusion: In 2004 the minimum volume regulation has moderate structural effects on the care setting. In 2006 these effects will be stronger due to the doubled number of interventions required for most of the minimum volumes. The effects on transplantations have to be differentiated from those on oesophageal and pancreatic interventions since the former are already highly centralised whereas the latter are mainly provided on a medium hospital care level and will be shifted on to the maximum hospital care level. This process should stimulate a debate on geographically equal access to care within and among the Federal Sates.

Cooperation in psychosocial care is gaining increasing importance due to newly established psychosomatic departments in the acute care setting and to structural changes following the Health Care Modernization Act. The presented study aims at describing the psychosomatic treatment and cooperation practice in the ambulatory sector and the cooperation possibilities with the inpatient psychosomatic care sector. Registered doctors in all specialties along with psychotherapists working in private practice in the southwestern region of the Association of Panel Doctors (Nordbaden) were surveyed about this in a written questionnaire in 2003. Respondents totaled 497 (33 %). General practitioners (GPs) and somatic specialists first estimated the psychosocial treatment necessities based on patients in their own practice. Half reported cooperation with a psychosomatic colleague, 10 % took part in a Balint-style group. GPs and somatic specialists unlicensed in psychosomatic basic care reported significantly lower numbers on the existing psychosocial care practice compared to those with the respective license. GPs and somatic specialists regard diagnostic procedures as central for improving their daily psychosomatic/psychosocial care. More than 50 % would request a brief diagnostic screening instrument. Psychiatrists and psychotherapists prefer the option of case conferences. The reported cooperation preferences of a psychosomatic department follow established setting structures with little mention of cooperation options falling outside established sectors. GPs and psychiatrists/psychotherapists share the same priority in designating a contact person in the department for crisis intervention. This expresses their feelings for greater need in direct and acute cooperation features. Somatic specialists prefer to request a second opinion from the department. The predominant diagnoses to admit patients for both psychiatrists and psychotherapists are eating disorders, pain syndromes, and personality disorders.

Multiple studies have demonstrated positive associations between volume and treatment outcome, especially in complex procedures. However, using these results in determining volume standards in Germany keeps being problematic: often, there is a lack of specific German data on the volume and outcome of healthcare providers making the modeling of potential effects almost impossible. In addition, recent publications focusing on the methods that are typically used in analyzing these associations indicate that the significance of positive volume-outcome associations is limited. The methodological quality of most studies is rather low, and there is a high heterogeneity among them concerning study populations, case mix, study designs and analytical methods. Results on the single-hospital level show a high variation of outcome parameters. There are both good hospitals with low volumes and bad hospitals with high volumes. Using the "best guideline-based current procedures" seems to be of high importance for the good outcomes of small and big hospitals. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that data on historical outcomes are a better predictor for good outcomes than hospital procedural volumes. Furthermore in some studies negative outcomes were shown to be related to high volumes at facilities with a high case load per staff member. These results suggest that a more sophisticated consideration of the methods and results of volume-outcome studies is required. Therefore, volume standards should continue to be cautiously applied and obligatorily accompanied by health services research.

The study objective is to outline basic aspects of medical care service structure in the fields of psychosomatic medicine in a clinical acute-care setting. A total of 216 inpatients in a psychosomatic ward of a general hospital were investigated during a 32 months period using a retrospective study design. Referring physicians and clinics along with referral procedures, the waiting period, teamwork with other clinics, as well as patient and therapy characteristics are described. According to provisions of outpatient psychosocial care, general practitioners refer the majority of the inpatients (55 %), followed by other clinics (25 %) and psychosomatic and psychiatric outpatient specialists (20 %). An outpatient department along with a psychosomatic C-L service are key elements for a psychosomatic department to ensure coordination of the referral procedure. The average waiting period lasts 21 days, the average length of stay is 48 days. 60 % of the inpatients show somatic and psychiatric co morbidity. A psychopharmacological treatment has to be taken into consideration along with multi-modal psychotherapy in a third of all patients.

Copyright of Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Public Health Forum is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie is the property of Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie is the property of Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Chirurg is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)