The principle of sustainability and the professional ethos demand that foresters have a pronounced ability to look far into the future and to make decisions accordingly. This also becomes a dilemma however, because the necessity for long-term planning is at odds with the high uncertainty of forest systems. In the political sense, visions of the future are political goods, which are communicated and defended and to which the legitimacy of current actions relates. Therefore, the way in which the future is imagined and, in a sense, constructed has a real influence on the shape of tomorrow's forests. The present study therefore examines forest stakeholders' visions of the future and their shifts over time. For this purpose, two online surveys on forest stakeholders' perception of the future for the time horizon 2050 were conducted with an interval of nearly ten years (2007 and 2016/2017) and the shifts in trends were compared with one another. The questionnaire consisted of 26 statements about the future for the year 2050 on the topics of forestry's general orientation, new management forms, resource demand, technology, forest ownership, nature conservation and wilderness as well as social importance, which the participants could agree to or reject. The respective answer frequencies of both surveys were identified and compared. In addition, a cluster analysis was conducted to identify groups of people with similar response behavior. The results show that forest stakeholders' long-term perception of the future is strongly guided by current circumstances and that changes are primarily seen as a strengthening or weakening of current trends. The perception of the future is independent of stakeholder group, age or gender (Tab. 1). Differences over time can be found both for the question of resource availability and economic orientation, as well as for the question about wilderness areas and the function of the forest as a CO2 sink. The cluster analysis revealed that two perspectives on the future were stable over time. A group "Increased Significance of Forestry" saw a positive increase in the importance of forestry in the future, another group "Structural Preservation in Forest Use" saw little change in the conditions for forest use compared to today. In the year 2007 a third cluster "Intensification of the Economic Function" primarily saw the economic function as dominant in the year 2050, while in 2016/2017 a third cluster "Increase in Segregation" perceived both economic interests and nature conservation as predominant (Tab. 2 and 3). From the results, one can conclude that trend shifts between the surveys can be explained by developments that occurred in the years between the surveys. Parallels can be observed through the comparison with contemporary documents that substantiate the development of the discourse. Though one can't definitively clarify whether the different results can be ascribed to a changed perception due to experiences, the results do provide indications of this. This would mean that forest stakeholders' long-term perception of the future is shaped by their current experiences of trends and trend shifts, which calls the reliability of long-term forest planning into question. A suggestion for a solution is to document expectations for the future over the course of several years, so that they do not just find their way into structured planning processes as snapshots. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]