Search

Introduction: Arterioureteral fistulas are rare, life-threatening, and difficult to diagnose. Risk factors are medical interventions in the lesser pelvis (general, urological, gynecological, and vascular surgery), radiation therapy of the lesser pelvis, permanent double J catheters, and previous vessel malformations., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all cases of arterioureteral fistulas registered over the last 10 years in the clinic's documentation system. For all cases, clinical symptoms, diagnostics, therapies as well as clinical outcome were evaluated., Results: Four of the 5 patients were women. The most common initial symptom was a gross hematuria (4/5). All patients had a permanent double J catheter after extensive surgery of the lesser pelvis. In one case the initial diagnosis was done by retrograde ureterography, in 2 patients by provocative angiography and in the other 2 cases with a laparotomy due to cardiovascular problems. Three patients were treated by open surgery and 2 patients were treated by stenting of the iliac artery. One patient died, 2 patients had a permanent kidney fistula, and 2 patients continued treatment with a permanent double J catheter., Conclusion: Based on the more aggressive therapy regimens, we expect that the number of patients presenting with arterioureteral fistulas will continue to rise. The identification of these patients based on their risk profile is essential.

Introduction: Since its first description in 1939 not more than approximately 80 cases of ureteroiliac artery fistulas have been reported. The incidence seems to increase with the number of endo-vascular and endo-urological interventions. Risk factors include pelvic vascular surgery and surgery for malignancy, irradiation and ureteral stenting. Due to the intermittent symptomatology, the preoperative diagnosis and planning of the therapeutic approach are often difficult., Case Report: We report the case of an ureteroiliac artery fistula caused by an iliac artery aneurysm following vascular surgery, and review the literature., Conclusions: In case of preoperative diagnosis it is of great importance to coordinate the cooperation of urologists, vascular surgeons and radiologists in order to achieve the best treatment for the patient.