Search

Background: A broader distribution of bedside color-coded duplex sonography (CCD) for detection of cerebral circulatory arrest (CCA) would be important to improve its use in the diagnosis of irreversible loss of brain function (ILBF-Dx)., Question: Is extracranial compared to the commonly applied transcranial CCD of the brain-supplying vessels (ECCD vs. TCCD) equivalent for the detection of CCA in ILBF-Dx regarding specificity and sensitivity?, Material and Methods: Study period January 2019-June 2022, screening of 136 and inclusion of 114 patients with severe brain lesions > 24 h after onset of fixed and dilated pupils, apnea and completed ILBF-Dx. Exclusion of patients without brainstem areflexia and guideline-conform applicability of CCD. Complementary ECCD (and TCCD, if other method used for irreversibility detection)., Results: Detection of ILBF (ILBF+) in 86.8% (99/114), no ILBF (ILBF-) in 13.2% (15/114). ECCD was fully feasible in all patients; findings matching CCA were found in 94/99 ILBF+ cases (ECCD+) and not in 5 patients (ECCD-). All 15 patients with ILBF- showed ECCD- findings. Thus, the specificity of ECCD was 1.0, and the sensitivity was 0.949. TCCD showed CCA in 56 patients (TCCD+), and ECCD+ was also found in all of them. An inconclusive result of TCCD in ILBF+ was found in 38 cases, with parallel ECCD+ in all of these patients. In 20 cases, TCCD did not show CCA (TCCD-), these also showed ECCD-. Of these patients 15 were ILBF- and 5 were ILBF+., Discussion: TCCD was not completely feasible or inconclusive in one third of the cases, whereas ECCD was always feasible. ECCD showed high validity with respect to the detection of CCA. Therefore, the possibility of using ECCD alone to detect CCA in ILBF-Dx should be discussed., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

There are several automated analytical methods to detect thromboembolic vascular occlusions, the infarct core and the potential infarct-endangered tissue (tissue at risk) by means of multimodal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The infarct core is more reliably visualized by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI or CT perfusion than by native CT. The extent of tissue at risk and endangerment can only be estimated; however, it seems essential whether "tissue at risk" actually exists. To ensure consistent patient care, uniform imaging protocols should be acquired in the referring hospital and thrombectomy center and the collected data should be standardized and automatically evaluated and presented. Whether patients with a large infarct core and with or without tissue at risk or patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) but low NIHSS benefit from thrombectomy has to be evaluated in controlled clinical trials using standardized imaging protocols. A promising, potentially time-saving approach is also native CT and CT angiography using a flat-panel detector angiography system for assessment of vessel occlusion and leptomeningeal collaterals.