T. Koch, T. Volk, Klaus-Dieter Wernecke, O. Vicent, Hinnerk Wulf, Axel R. Heller, P. Geiger, Bernd Kutter, Thorsten Steinfeldt, Claudia Spies, D. Gruenewald, Petra Gastmeier, Hartmut Bürkle, Florian Heid, Lars Engelhardt, and Christian Werner
BackgroundTo analyze safety issues of regional anaesthesia and analgesia in Germany only a few single center studies are available. Therefore, the German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anasthesiologie und Intensivmedizin, DGAI) and the Professional Association of German Anaesthetists (Berufsverband Deutscher Anasthesisten, BDA) initiated a network for safety in regional anaesthesia. From this the first results on infectious complications will be reported.Materials and methodsIn a Delphi process the documentation of the setup and maintenance of regional anaesthesia and analgesia was agreed with the participants in a working group from the DGAI. After approval by the officially authorized representative for patient data privacy protection a registry was programmed to collect anonymous data. Up to October 2008 data from 6 centers could be analyzed.ResultsAfter testing for plausibility 8,781 regional anaesthesia procedures (22,112 catheter days) could be analyzed. The 5,057 neuraxial and 3,724 peripheral catheter-based procedures were in place for a median of 2.48 days (range 1.0-3.0 days) and 4 severe, 15 moderate and 128 mild infections were recorded. Diabetics were not found to show a statistically significant increase in risk (2.6% compared to 1.9% for non-diabetics: n.s.). Neuraxial procedures seem to have a higher rate of infections than peripheral procedures (2.7% vs. 1.3%, p